A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Female pilot accident rates



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old October 26th 04, 09:53 PM
NoPoliticsHere
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Peter Stickney wrote:

The sex of the pilot makes no difference.


Suuurrrrre it didn't. Six prior crashes and still allowed
to fly the F-14, and the sex made no difference????

Makes about as much sense as your other milksop response.

-------------
  #52  
Old October 26th 04, 10:21 PM
Gig Giacona
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"WaltBJ" wrote in message
om...
FWIW I trained women pilots transitioning to the L1011 while working
at Eastern. Without exception they were meticulous pilots who studied
hard and really learned the airplane. I also knew Betty Skelton - she
was a 'pretty good' woman pilot (understatement for effect).
Walt BJ


And how long was it after they transitioned women to the L-1011 that the
company folded?



  #53  
Old October 26th 04, 11:54 PM
Schmoe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"T.Roger" wrote in message
om...
Anita Hill



I take it you don't get laid alot.


  #54  
Old October 27th 04, 12:58 AM
Tien Dao
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Gary Drescher" wrote in message
news:3zvfd.531832$8_6.258553@attbi_s04...
By analogy, there is a genetic correlation between gender and height. But
knowing this correlation doesn't help us to be on the lookout for what

size
clothing we should buy. You want to buy clothing that fits you, not
clothing that fits the average person of your gender.


Maybe you are right. Although, I would have to add that you cannot change
your height, but if you have judgement or coordination inadequacies, these
might be addressed by further training, knowing that you MAY be more
predisposed to these types of errors. Also, for example, knowing that many
women feel sensitive what may constitute sexual harassment limits, a man may
be taught to better control his innate sexual drives. Arnold found this out
the hard way. No pun intended...

Tien


  #55  
Old October 27th 04, 01:44 AM
John Mazor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Gig Giacona" wrote in message
...

"WaltBJ" wrote in message
om...
FWIW I trained women pilots transitioning to the L1011 while working
at Eastern. Without exception they were meticulous pilots who studied
hard and really learned the airplane. I also knew Betty Skelton - she
was a 'pretty good' woman pilot (understatement for effect).
Walt BJ


And how long was it after they transitioned women to the L-1011 that the
company folded?


Frank Lorenzo wasn't a woman.


  #56  
Old October 27th 04, 02:30 AM
Gary Drescher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Tien Dao" wrote in message
.. .

"Gary Drescher" wrote in message
news:3zvfd.531832$8_6.258553@attbi_s04...
By analogy, there is a genetic correlation between gender and height. But
knowing this correlation doesn't help us to be on the lookout for what

size
clothing we should buy. You want to buy clothing that fits you, not
clothing that fits the average person of your gender.


Maybe you are right. Although, I would have to add that you cannot change
your height,


Well, you could wear elevator shoes or something, which would be analogous
to training that compensates for innate weaknesses in your judgment or
coordination.

but if you have judgement or coordination inadequacies, these
might be addressed by further training, knowing that you MAY be more
predisposed to these types of errors.


Again, though, your judgment and your coordination are on display throughout
your flight training (as well as in other areas of your life). So even if
there turns out to be a correlation between gender and judgment or
coordination, your gender doesn't tell you anything you and your instructor
didn't already know about whether you need compensatory training--just as
(despite the correlation) your gender doesn't tell you anything you didn't
already know about your height.

I agree with your broader point, though, that we needn't just surrender to
whatever innate dispositions we may have; instead, we can work to change how
those dispositions are expressed. But we should be careful to distinguish an
individual's own predispositions from the average predispositions among some
group that the individual belongs to.

--Gary


  #57  
Old October 27th 04, 02:46 AM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



NoPoliticsHere wrote:

Anonymity
is more likely to bring honesty, as far as inner opinions. Most people
who post with real names make sure they walk the line they've been told
to walk.


So someone who's lying about who they are is somehow more honest than someone who
doesn't lie? Not hardly. As far as I can tell, people post pretty much what they
think and/or feel -- it's not like there's some sort of police coming to get someone
who posts a PIC opinion. It just seems that many of those with the most extreme
opinions seem to be ashamed of them and don't want anyone to know who they are.

George Patterson
If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have
been looking for it.
  #58  
Old October 27th 04, 04:09 AM
Jose
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

So someone who's lying about who they are is somehow more honest than someone who
doesn't lie?


Posting anonymously is not lying about who you are. It's just not saying anything about who you are. Different.

it's not like there's some sort of police coming to get someone
who posts a PIC opinion.


Well, that's not exactly true. In some circles there may actually =be= "PC police", with consequences to one's employment, marital status, or other parts of one's life.

It just seems that many of those with the most extreme
opinions seem to be ashamed of them and don't want anyone to know who they are.


Not wanting anyone to know who you are does not imply shame of opinions. Pcople on Usenet come from different surroundings (and from all over the world).

I have no opinion on the underlying issue, but I do have an opinion on correct reasoning.

Jose
--
for Email, make the obvious change in the address
(replied to the post in a.a.safety, r.a.piloting, and r.a.safety, but I only follow r.a.p.)

  #59  
Old October 27th 04, 07:24 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


NoPoliticsHere wrote:
That's easy. No special allowances for gender. Female pilots should
be held to the same standards as the guys. If that means two females
in one cockpit, so be it, but make it equitable.

--------------


I am all for that. Same standards, same opportunities. Women can and
do perform well in high-stress environments, generally speaking.

I like to fly, but I daresay I don't have whatever it takes to fly an
F-14 in carrier operations. But then, *statistically*, you don't
either. Very few people do.

But women can do ok, given the chance. Debby Rihn-Harvey, Svetlana
Kapanina, and Patty Wagstaff are examples of this.

Wendy

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Who's At Fault in UAV/Part91 MAC? Larry Dighera Piloting 72 April 30th 04 11:28 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM
Effect of Light Sport on General Aviation Gilan Home Built 17 September 24th 03 06:11 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.