![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Freedom_In_Flying" wrote in message ... "John Doe" wrote I'm wondering about how piloting is taught. Getting to the point, why not use a long runway and have the student take off just enough for the wheels to leave the ground and then immediately touch down? This guy is either a kid or a troll, retarded or all of the above. He is in a few other groups (rec.models.rc.helicopter and air). He is asking stupid questions like " aren't fast spinning propellers blades dangerous" "plonk" Or maybe he's a college student. Matt --------------------- Matthew W. Barrow Site-Fill Homes, LLC. Montrose, CO |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Freedom_In_Flying" wrote:
"John Doe" wrote I'm wondering about how piloting is taught. Getting to the point, why not use a long runway and have the student take off just enough for the wheels to leave the ground and then immediately touch down? This guy is either a kid or a troll, retarded or all of the above. He is in a few other groups (rec.models.rc.helicopter and air). He is asking stupid questions like " aren't fast spinning propellers blades dangerous" That's a lie. I didn't start that thread and I didn't say anything about propellers being dangerous. "plonk" Grandstanding troll. Richard Path: newssvr11.news.prodigy.com!newscon03.news.prodigy. com!newsmst01a.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!border 1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local1.n ntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.rogers.com!news.rogers.c om.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 06:41:57 -0600 From: "Freedom_In_Flying" spam @rogers.spam Newsgroups: rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student References: Subject: taking off for the first time Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 07:41:56 -0500 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response Message-ID: UZSdnQXyr7KIEkfcRVn-rg @rogers.com Lines: 42 NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.195.88.182 X-Trace: sv3-jlvpRgzCnjmPJRQKs84j/wOhC5bj733Wi4kBO0agFLYlUI02Rn2hR8fEtcyD1ha/t0csRIysZu7tFrg!SmjPhYzAW5hkmOjng83MVqYHg+v/lBUUL+ix9j0IjXoxCZvaeiNJiZfc394lQSwvbvu52mL/ X-Complaints-To: X-DMCA-Complaints-To: X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.22 Xref: newsmst01a.news.prodigy.com rec.aviation.piloting:415096 rec.aviation.student:290814 "Jose" wrote in message om... .... |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hmmmm....
........are those of us who build/fly the R/C models THAT low? D. On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 11:42:24 -0700, "Matt Barrow" wrote: "John Doe" wrote in message . .. "Matt Barrow" wrote: "John Doe" wrote in message Can you fly and post to Usenet at the same time? That's coming pretty soon, though many people can now from airliners. I understand that limited Internet service is available via mobile phones, but can you reference any post ever to Usenet while flying? Not that someone has bragged of doing it, but using Google Newsgroups it's certainly possible. What's this obsession with posting from an aircraft? If that's your mentality level, please stick with radio-controlleds. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave" wrote in message ... Hmmmm.... ........are those of us who build/fly the R/C models THAT low? D. Only when you act really stupid. -- Jim in NC |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ramapriya" wrote I've not done flight simulation either. I built a house for a guy several years ago, that was a yuckety yuk at a commercial flight sim for US Air. I was told to give him a call, and one night that it was not scheduled, I could come and play. I could kick my behind for not taking him up on it. -- Jim in NC |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Troll.
"Morgans" wrote: Path: newssvr30.news.prodigy.com!newsdbm05.news.prodigy. com!newsdst02.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01a.news.pro digy.com!prodigy.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!pr odigy.net!news-feed01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net!nntp.frontiernet.net !newsfeed2.telusplanet.net!newsfeed.telus.net!bigf eed.bellsouth.net!news.bellsouth.net!hwmnpeer01.lg a!hwmedia!hw-poster!fe05.lga.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "Morgans" jsmorgan @chJUarNKer.net Newsgroups: rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student References: Subject: Has anyone posted from an airplane? (Was taking off for the first time) Lines: 15 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Message-ID: t6HCd.39786$4Y6.32054 @fe05.lga X-Trace: nghlfjfcphhogbndlfpdmdlfcbgpfondhgpdhhmcaiabcignen njejjkdbckoaeiffncgfnojaonepigffccjibdjfpkeifpjifd mbokhamigmmemaencpbiccclbbibafniTˆ NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 18:08:41 MST Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 19:33:48 -0500 Xref: newsmst01a.news.prodigy.com rec.aviation.piloting:415198 rec.aviation.student:290862 "Dave" wrote in message .. . Hmmmm.... ........are those of us who build/fly the R/C models THAT low? D. Only when you act really stupid. -- Jim in NC |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I recall doing only a couple of such hops as part of my training, but
that was very late in the course. (Procedural training for powerloss at take-off, part of the emergency procedures taught here). /Rolf On 2005-01-04 01:08, Frankster wrote: Well.. you T/O with full power. If you want to then do an immediate landing, you will have one hell-ov-a power-back-flaps-down-establish-glide-flair-land TRANSITION in a very compressed amount of time. Doesn't sound like a good learning technique to me. -Frank "John Doe" wrote in message ... I have never piloted an aircraft. I do flight simulation from time to time. Currently I am messing with radio controlled aircraft. There are simulators for that also. Having only simulation experience, but I'm wondering about how piloting is taught. Getting to the point, why not use a long runway and have the student take off just enough for the wheels to leave the ground and then immediately touch down? Again, inexperienced with the real thing, but isn't landing so difficult/critical to warrant special treatment like that? Trainer runways are not long enough? The wear and tear would be too much? That maneuver would be too difficult for a beginner to coordinate? Genuinely curious. Thank you. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John Doe" wrote in message
... I have never piloted an aircraft. I do flight simulation from time to time. Currently I am messing with radio controlled aircraft. There are simulators for that also. Having only simulation experience, but I'm wondering about how piloting is taught. Getting to the point, why not use a long runway and have the student take off just enough for the wheels to leave the ground and then immediately touch down? There is one school of thought on flight instruction where the student's first lesson is precisely to takeoff and fly very close to the runway at very near the landing airspeed. It's uncommon, and in some ways it demands far more control right from the start. More typically, the student flies the first takeoff, with the instructor following on the controls or being prepared to take control, and the airplane promptly leaves the airport pattern for gentle maneuvers at a higher altitude where there is more cushion for safety. In a sense, some would see your suggestion as similar to teaching driving to a new driver by putting them on the interstate very near to other cars or driving down a very narrow road, just inches from serious danger. Most people's first driving experience is confined to a large and empty parking lot where very precise vehicle control is not demanded at every instant. There are benefits to your suggestion, but it's not common. -- Scott Like the archers of Agincourt, John O'Neill and the 254 Swiftboat Veterans took down their own haughty Frenchman. - Ann Coulter |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/5/2005 14:21, tscottme wrote:
"John Doe" wrote in message ... I have never piloted an aircraft. I do flight simulation from time to time. Currently I am messing with radio controlled aircraft. There are simulators for that also. Having only simulation experience, but I'm wondering about how piloting is taught. Getting to the point, why not use a long runway and have the student take off just enough for the wheels to leave the ground and then immediately touch down? There is one school of thought on flight instruction where the student's first lesson is precisely to takeoff and fly very close to the runway at very near the landing airspeed. It's uncommon, and in some ways it demands far more control right from the start. More typically, the student flies the first takeoff, with the instructor following on the controls or being prepared to take control, and the airplane promptly leaves the airport pattern for gentle maneuvers at a higher altitude where there is more cushion for safety. In a sense, some would see your suggestion as similar to teaching driving to a new driver by putting them on the interstate very near to other cars or driving down a very narrow road, just inches from serious danger. Most people's first driving experience is confined to a large and empty parking lot where very precise vehicle control is not demanded at every instant. There are benefits to your suggestion, but it's not common. Actually, this is how it is done in ultralight training when you don't have an instructor. Although I don't remember the name of the book right now, it is a staple in Ultralight flying. It suggested that your initial flights be short "crow-hops" where you get used to the feeling of the vehicle in ground effect and flaring for landing. This, of course, comes after some prerequisites, like a thorough understanding of the principles of flight, taxiing at different speeds, etc. However, as others have said, it's not practical for normal flight training, as you have an instructor ready and able to help in the event there are any problems. You don't even have to know how to land until later in your training career. -- Mark Hansen PP-ASEL, C-172M/G |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark Hansen wrote:
... you have an instructor ready and able to help in the event there are any problems. You don't even have to know how to land until later in your training career. Unless your instructor has a heart attack [kidding]. Thanks for the kind replies. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NTSB: USAF included? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 10 | September 11th 05 10:33 AM |
First Time Buyer - High Time Turbo Arrow | [email protected] | Owning | 21 | July 6th 04 07:30 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
they took me back in time and the nsa or japan wired my head and now they know the idea came from me so if your back in time and wounder what happen they change tim liverance history for good. I work at rts wright industries and it a time travel trap | tim liverance | Military Aviation | 0 | August 18th 03 12:18 AM |
Retroactive correction of logbook errors | Marty Ross | Piloting | 10 | July 31st 03 06:44 AM |