![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]() : I inquired about their use in gliders (practically : no weight and could go in fuselage behind wing) and : someone told me they would not give a strong enough : signal for aircraft use owing to the speeds involved. I have heard that a military ATC who visited one site where I fly said that it would make a considerable improvement to the radar return from a glider. It's on my list of things to do. Ian You could fly a tin AC!!! ;-) Peter Pilatus B4 |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Imagine this scenario.
A gliding competition in southern England with 100+ gliders all with transponders, Plus non competition gliders flying with transponders, Plus light aircraft flying VFR, Plus commercial, Plus military all with transponders bleeping away. The poor chap on the Radar would have a totally confused picture. The authorities would then want to make sense of it because they look so close together on the screen, all these people flying VFR outside controlled airspace. Before we know where we are there will be NO uncontrolled airspace and since gliders cannot maintain nice neat constant heights and headings they would be banned. Paranoid me? Maybe |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
After 20,000+ hours of civilian and military flying, given the number
of times that I have not seen an aircraft until he is _no longer_ a threat, I have decided that there are probably few, if any, days when we see all of the traffic in our area throughout the flight. If we all knew how much traffic we miss, we'd work a lot harder to see and avoid, and to be seen and avoided. Jack |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ian Cant wrote:
Sometimes that is so; what if you install one because you want to operate in Class A or B airspace [as opposed to being more visible in uncontrolled airspace]? A very rare case indeed. I know of few glider pilots who would operate in such airspace. I think the stats that 80% of glider pilots twirl around their home field isn't because of lack of transponders or radios... On the other hand, here in the states, SSA has proposed to the FAA allowing glider pilots to legally turn transponders on and off in flight, to conserve battery power. I think the FAA is unlikely to approve this. If I'm faced with this situation, I will notice it is inoperative, turn it off, and place the appropriate sticker on it. Later in the flight, when I have the time to test it further, I'll turn it on and notice it works, and I will remove the sticker. The other perhaps much more important activity is to learn enough about the IFR approach procedures near high volume airports where you are about to fly. The US VFR charts have magenta shaded markings which often extend from busier airports indicating an IFR approach. Also, for $4-$5 one can purchase the IFR approach plates for a region of the US. Any instrument pilot can show enough about these to add some perspective. Of course, this is really mostly to avoid high volume approaches to commuter airports, but I've used it to assure I avoid commuter traffic near several gliderports. -- ------------+ Mark J. Boyd |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Carl J. Niedermeyer wrote:
I believe the accident Eric is referring to occurred in 1978 between a Piper PA-32R (Lance or Saratoga, I forget which) and my partner flying our LS1-f. 5 people were killed, no surviviors. http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id=39335&key=0 Amazing how long ago this accident happened. Hmmm...the accident reports don't indicate if this was very near a gliderport or near Moses Lake (the Piper's departure point). I'd be interested in more details, if they are available. I suppose the altitude of the collision is unknown... -- ------------+ Mark J. Boyd |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jack wrote:
After 20,000+ hours of civilian and military flying, given the number of times that I have not seen an aircraft until he is _no longer_ a threat, I have decided that there are probably few, if any, days when we see all of the traffic in our area throughout the flight. If we all knew how much traffic we miss, we'd work a lot harder to see and avoid, and to be seen and avoided. Given how much traffic I see within 4 miles of an airport vs. how much I see during random flight paths away from airports, combined with the midair accident statistics and my own close calls, I have some conclusions. I'm very attentive (looking outside) at "D" towered airports. I fly enroute below 3000 AGL at "off" altitudes (2700, 2340, etc), except when overflying airports. I avoid overflying navaids (VORs) and airports, often diverting 5+ miles away/around them. If I notice an airplane, I immediately assume there are more nearby. I don't fly in glider gaggles or contests as I don't have the avoidance skills necessary to feel comfortable. I only fly near the same thermal/ridge with other gliders if it is exactly one other glider, or I have two people on board (one as lookout). Those very experienced in gaggles have different standards, but this has worked for me so far. -- ------------+ Mark J. Boyd |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "F.L. Whiteley" wrote in message ... (snip) George Thelen has one, F-4 at an estimated three foot separation. IIRC, that's what really got him into writing about safety for Soaring. Frank Whiteley George is a friend of mine, and I know that story well, and it is believable and scary. That said, I think that military fighter pilots are not immune from buzzing gliders: "Hey Maverick, got the glider at 12:00? Lets wake him up." Been there, done that (twice, on the receiving end), have the stained shorts... Now when one goes by the first thing I think of is "Wingman!" -Bob |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article 41ab5a00$1@darkstar,
(Mark James Boyd) wrote: Carl J. Niedermeyer wrote: I believe the accident Eric is referring to occurred in 1978 between a Piper PA-32R (Lance or Saratoga, I forget which) and my partner flying our LS1-f. 5 people were killed, no surviviors. http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id=39335&key=0 Amazing how long ago this accident happened. Hmmm...the accident reports don't indicate if this was very near a gliderport or near Moses Lake (the Piper's departure point). I'd be interested in more details, if they are available. I suppose the altitude of the collision is unknown... -- ------------+ Mark J. Boyd The accident occurred approximately 7 or 8 nm miles West of Ephrata, where we fly from. The altimeter in the LS1-f was broken with the hands indicating about 6700 feet MSL (IIRC), about 5000 feet AGL. There were no clouds that day and visibilty was 150 miles. I have the complete report somewhere in my files. Carl J. Niedermeyer Washington State USA |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark James Boyd wrote:
Carl J. Niedermeyer wrote: I believe the accident Eric is referring to occurred in 1978 between a Piper PA-32R (Lance or Saratoga, I forget which) and my partner flying our LS1-f. 5 people were killed, no surviviors. http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id=39335&key=0 Amazing how long ago this accident happened. Hmmm...the accident reports don't indicate if this was very near a gliderport or near Moses Lake (the Piper's departure point). I'd be interested in more details, if they are available. I suppose the altitude of the collision is unknown... Carl N. can tell you more accurately, but I recall it was about 10 miles NW of Ephrata airport, where the glider launched from, and probably in the 5000-7000 msl range. -- Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|