![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "O. Sami Saydjari" wrote: Tim, Chapter 1, section 1 of the AIM would seem to be most appropriate for this question, and I have found no references to radar echoes. If you have a pointer to the information that you think answers my question, that would be helpful. Please forgive my ignorance, but I do not know the acronym "IHB." Please expand. FAA Instrument Handbook I have also tried Circular AC-00-6A, and did not find it. I would also note that note of these sources is likley to answer the questions of color mapping on a GDL-49/Garmin 430. That is Garmin's responsibility to explain what their equipment does and presents. Having said that, a pilot cannot be expected to assess the levels of intensity to the same degree of discernment that a severe weather expert sitting at a desk with a giant NEXRAD display does. Green, yellow, and red where chosen for color radar displays based on the same human factors used for traffic lights, and other safety signals. Some folks used monochrome radar displays very successfully for many years. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gerry Caron wrote:
Rod Machado's column in the latest AOPA Pilot covers the subject very well. I haven't seen the referenced article, but I remember from seeing a R. Machado presentation that he had some interesting graphics relating echo intensity to expected turbulence. IIRC his presentation included pointers to the literature. Seems like Rod has done a lot of work in this area. Dave |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Newps wrote: O. Sami Saydjari wrote: As I was coming into Grand Rapids (KGRR) yesterday, the controller announced that there was a "level 5" return (or perhaps she said "cell") on final to runway 8, so I was vectored to 35 where there were mostly "just level 4" stuff. That's pretty funny because even the airlines ain't flying thru a level four return on final. Well, Eastern did at JFK in 1976 (OTA) and Delta did at DFW in 1985 (OTA). |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "O. Sami Saydjari" wrote: That is pretty odd. I am sure she said level 4. The rain seemed only moderate to me and visibility seemed like it was 2-3 miles. Perhaps I got lucky. How sure are you that airlines do not land in level 4? If so, it seems that they would advise a light aircraft to divert or hold. ATC does not provide advice as to whether you should divert or hold because of thunderstorms in the area. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Start by doing a search on "Radar VIP level". Basically VIP levels measure
reflectivity and go from 1 to 6. Anything from 3 on up is probably a thunderstorm in North America although in the tropics you can get level three without a thunderstorm. A level 5 is considered an "extreme" echo. Your Garmin displays a VIP 5 as orange. A level 5 echo will produce about 6-8" of rain per hour (I forget the exact figure) so you are looking a a "wrath of God" type storm and if you fly in the side you will probably come raining out the bottom in little pieces There are a lot of general observations like "a level five echo in FL will probably be less severe than a level five echo in the Great Plains", but since these observations always include a "probably" they are not too useful. Some pilots think that they can tell the level of a thunderstorm by looking at it, they are idiots. Mike MU-2 "O. Sami Saydjari" wrote in message ... Tim, Chapter 1, section 1 of the AIM would seem to be most appropriate for this question, and I have found no references to radar echoes. If you have a pointer to the information that you think answers my question, that would be helpful. Please forgive my ignorance, but I do not know the acronym "IHB." Please expand. I have also tried Circular AC-00-6A, and did not find it. I would also note that note of these sources is likley to answer the questions of color mapping on a GDL-49/Garmin 430. -Sami wrote: "O. Sami Saydjari" wrote: As I was coming into Grand Rapids (KGRR) yesterday, the controller announced that there was a "level 5" return (or perhaps she said "cell") on final to runway 8, so I was vectored to 35 where there were mostly "just level 4" stuff. So, forgive my ignorance, but where are these levels defined? I assume they have to do with what sort of radar return they get off a cloud and therefore has to do with rain intensity. Does a level 5 return imply that a thunderstorm is likely to be generating it? Also, I have a GDL-49 Satellite Data Link Transceiver linked to my Garmin 430 display. I understand (and now have seen) that these things just are not adequate to locate big cells. Rather, they show large areas of showers. Are these based on satellite imagery, or from aggregated ground station data or what? Also, how to the radar levels (1 thru 6?) relate to the colors shown on a GDL-49 display on a Garmin 430? Does red equal level 5 or level 6? I think only have red, yellow and green...so it seems there are not enough colors to show 6 levels. -Sami, N2057M, Piper Turbo Arrow III You might try checking the AIM, for starters. Then, perhaps, the IHB. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"O. Sami Saydjari" wrote in message
... In googling around a bit, I found the following: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ At: http://www.weatherzone.com.au/misc/g...y.jsp?letter=V "Video Integrator and Processor, which contours radar reflectivity (in dBZ) into six VIP levels: • VIP 1 (Level 1, 18-30 dBZ) - Light precipitation • VIP 2 (Level 2, 30-38 dBZ) - Light to moderate rain. • VIP 3 (Level 3, 38-44 dBZ) - Moderate to heavy rain. • VIP 4 (Level 4, 44-50 dBZ) - Heavy rain • VIP 5 (Level 5, 50-57 dBZ) - Very heavy rain; hail possible. • VIP 6 (Level 6, 57 dBZ) - Very heavy rain and hail; large hail possible." --------------------------------------------------------------------------- At: http://www.garmin.com/manuals/773_Ga...deAddendum.pdf Ok, now, from the Nextrad intensity table on page 13 of the Garmin "400/500 Series garmin Options Displays", I learned: GREEN means 5-30 dBZ YELLOW means 30-55 dBZ RED means 55-75 dBZ So... Green is VIP Level 1 Yellow is VIP Levels 2,3,4 Red is VIP levels 5 and 6 Don't draw this conclusion unless you know exactly what the standards Garmin is using and what the radar system is using and whether they are compatible with the VIP levels that you are using. Nexrad seems to use different scales depending of what mode it is in and additionally, there are at least 2 VIP scales (maybe more), one that has six levels and one that has 15 levels. It also seem to produce different dbz readings than an airborn radar. There was a major airline accident in the SE (Georgia I think) where an airliner flew into a 50+ dbz echo (on an airborn radar) and the airliner was virtually destroyed by hail (the engines where broken up internally. I doubt that this is what Garmin is displaying as a borderline yellow/red echo. There is a good chance that you will not survive flying into a VIP 4 storm. Mike MU-2 |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Burns" wrote in message ... Sami, you've hit upon the answer to your question, and one thing to keep in mind is that radar don't know squat about whether the rain is from a thunderstorm or not, all it sees is the "reflection" of the precip, the higher the number, the higher the bounce back. Granted, a thunderstorm that is full of rain and hail will definately produce a higher return. Additional information about the current conditions vs. forecast conditions combined with front locations, movement, direction, sigmets, and airmets should provide you with a more complete picture of what your Data Link is showing you. Over the past couple weeks, we've had two totally different low pressure systems move through Wisconsin. The first contained a leading edge of thunderstorms, high winds and heavy rain. The last contained high winds, heavy rain, but no thunderstorms. The echoes for both storms were level 2's and 3's. The difference between the two storms was the amount of lifting action available. The first storm occurred during a period of relatively hot and unstable conditions. The second occurred during cool and more stable conditions, it was much less violent but the radar returns were the same. Jim Burns Yes, the real issue is that it takes vertical motion to get the droplets to coalesce together to procduce larger drops with higher reflectivity. If you have little moisture, it takes more vertical motion to get the same radar echo, hence the rule of thumb that the storm intensity for a given reflectivity goes up with decreasing availible moisture. Radar is about probablilities-a particular echo intensity has a particular probablility of producing a given level of turbulence, hail ect. Mike MU-2 |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "O. Sami Saydjari" wrote in message ... Newps wrote: O. Sami Saydjari wrote: As I was coming into Grand Rapids (KGRR) yesterday, the controller announced that there was a "level 5" return (or perhaps she said "cell") on final to runway 8, so I was vectored to 35 where there were mostly "just level 4" stuff. That's pretty funny because even the airlines ain't flying thru a level four return on final. That is pretty odd. I am sure she said level 4. The rain seemed only moderate to me and visibility seemed like it was 2-3 miles. Perhaps I got lucky. How sure are you that airlines do not land in level 4? If so, it seems that they would advise a light aircraft to divert or hold. The approach controller may have been using the 15 level VIP scale where level 4 is not severe. If you fly into the type of level 4 that Newps is talking about, you might (probably) won't come the other side. The airport would probably shut down with a "real" level 5 thunderstorm in the near vicinity Mike MU-2 |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The approach controller may have been using the 15 level VIP scale where level 4 is not severe. If you fly into the type of level 4 that Newps is talking about, you might (probably) won't come the other side. The airport would probably shut down with a "real" level 5 thunderstorm in the near vicinity What question would one ask to ascertain if it's "four out of 15" or "four out of six"? Jose -- Get high on gasoline: fly an airplane. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jose" wrote in message ... The approach controller may have been using the 15 level VIP scale where level 4 is not severe. If you fly into the type of level 4 that Newps is talking about, you might (probably) won't come the other side. The airport would probably shut down with a "real" level 5 thunderstorm in the near vicinity What question would one ask to ascertain if it's "four out of 15" or "four out of six"? Jose -- Get high on gasoline: fly an airplane. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. He may not know know the answer but you could always ask: "Has anybody successfully come out the other side?" :-) As a practical matter he is going to start covering his rear on tape if it looks like anyone is venturing into a level four (out of six) thunderstorm. "Say intentions", "how many souls on board", "do you have airborn radar" are all clues not to go in. A level four is considered a "strong" thunderstorm, one step below "severe" thunderstorms with large hail, very high winds and tornados. Mike MU-2 |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
IGC-approval levels for some types of Flight Recorders | Ian Strachan | Soaring | 42 | March 19th 05 05:42 PM |
Flight Levels?? | Chuck Dreier | Instrument Flight Rules | 6 | February 14th 05 04:34 PM |
Flight planning at the lower flight levels | Peter R. | Piloting | 2 | March 16th 04 02:39 AM |
AmeriFlight Crash | C J Campbell | Piloting | 5 | December 1st 03 02:13 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |