A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Minimum Experience and VLJ's (was Eclipse 500)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old July 10th 05, 05:04 AM
Richard Kaplan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

What is an air cycle machine?

--------------------
Richard Kaplan

www.flyimc.com


  #12  
Old July 10th 05, 05:19 AM
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It takes bleed air which is hot and uses the energy in the hot air to cool
and dehumidify it. It is basically a series of heat exchangers, expansion
turbines, compressors water traps/sprayers and valves. The rotating group
turns something like 100,000rpm and overhauling one in an MU-2 can be
upwards of $35,000. They typically last about 4000 hrs. The alternative is
a vapor cycle machine which is better at cooling but even more expensive.
Cabin windows and windshields last about 20yrs or so (4000 hr) and on a MU-2
cost $70,000 to replace. Nobody thinks about these things as being typical
costs but they can add significantly to the operating cost over the lifetime
of an airplane.

Mike
MU-2


"Richard Kaplan" wrote in message
news:1120968289.ca16ce6fd2c4644fb07a8b68b04395b6@t eranews...
What is an air cycle machine?

--------------------
Richard Kaplan

www.flyimc.com



  #13  
Old July 10th 05, 05:34 AM
Richard Kaplan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks for the explanation.

--------------------
Richard Kaplan

www.flyimc.com


  #14  
Old July 10th 05, 06:22 AM
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 04:02:10 GMT, "Mike Rapoport"
wrote in
. net::

Sure there are some buyers for which the VLJs are a perfect match. The
question is whether there are enough of these buyers to make the concept a
success.


Aren't VLJs prime candidates for fractional ownership?


  #15  
Old July 10th 05, 01:38 PM
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mike Rapoport wrote:

"Richard Kaplan" wrote in message
news:1120956204.98fefa56d19619adcc5219c8241868f4@t eranews...

I could not agree with you more.

I also think the alleged market for 1,000+ Eclipse air taxis is utterly
unrealistic. I do not believe the market exists for anywhere near that
many air taxis within the range and payload capabilities of the Eclipse
and given what will be the eventual costs.

--------------------
Richard Kaplan

www.flyimc.com


I agree. The claims of orders for hundreds or thousands of Eclipses are
crazy. These proposed air taxi companies don't have any meaningful assets.
How are they going to buy a billion dollars worth of airplanes?


Venture capital, just like all the other companies that have shakey
business plans.


Matt
  #16  
Old July 10th 05, 04:06 PM
john smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Larry Dighera wrote:
Aren't VLJs prime candidates for fractional ownership?


That remains to be seen.
As NetJets and Cessna learned operating Citation II's, the airplane just
wasn't designed for the high number of cycles the fractional operator
was placng on them.
Cessna service centers provided maintenance for NetJet aircraft. Cessna
applied what they learned from maintaining these aircraft to beef up the
structures and components on successive aircraft designs.
When NetJet began purchasing follow on aircraft to the Citation II's,
manufacturers service center maintenance and spares were always included
as part of the new aircraft purchase contract.
  #17  
Old July 10th 05, 05:03 PM
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I don't know if they are going to be rugged enough for high cycle
operations. The other issue is useful load particularly with a two pilot
crew.

Mike
MU-2


"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 04:02:10 GMT, "Mike Rapoport"
wrote in
. net::

Sure there are some buyers for which the VLJs are a perfect match. The
question is whether there are enough of these buyers to make the concept a
success.


Aren't VLJs prime candidates for fractional ownership?




  #18  
Old July 10th 05, 05:06 PM
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...
Mike Rapoport wrote:

"Richard Kaplan" wrote in message
news:1120956204.98fefa56d19619adcc5219c8241868f4@t eranews...

I could not agree with you more.

I also think the alleged market for 1,000+ Eclipse air taxis is utterly
unrealistic. I do not believe the market exists for anywhere near that
many air taxis within the range and payload capabilities of the Eclipse
and given what will be the eventual costs.

--------------------
Richard Kaplan

www.flyimc.com


I agree. The claims of orders for hundreds or thousands of Eclipses are
crazy. These proposed air taxi companies don't have any meaningful
assets. How are they going to buy a billion dollars worth of airplanes?


Venture capital, just like all the other companies that have shakey
business plans.


Matt


The largest venture deal was only 500MM. These air taxi companies are going
to have to demonstrate that the business model works before they get enough
money to buy the airplanes they have ordered.

Mike
MU-2


  #19  
Old July 11th 05, 07:13 AM
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mike Rapoport" wrote

If you just go flying then it will cost at least $50,000 to get the
100hrs and if you try to actually go places you will be paying for hotels,
meals, non flying time ect. I think that this will be one of the biggest
limitation to the VLJ market. Ask yourself: "How many people do I
personally know that have ALL of the following


I see the VLJ usage in the corporate / charter / time share / air taxi
market. There will be some Travolta types that have the dough, and the love
of flying themselves, but that will be a small share of the market, IMHO.

It should increase (significantly, perhaps) the number of people of flying,
and the amount of time in the air.

Jim in NC

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.