![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#121
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In 2200 hours of flying, I've never had a RAIM failure on my IFR GPS.
Trying to shoot an approach with a handheld, the problem is the unit being in your scan. If it were permanently mounted and you were familiar with it, it could work. I never do GPS approaches much anyway. I take the ILS if I can. |
#122
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jose" wrote in message . .. His destination and all options only have GPS instrument approaches, or all his other IFR instruments crapped out. If all the other IFR instruments crapped out, something is seriously wrong that needs fixing. Go to the VFR alternate. If, once VFR, the weather at the destination allows VFR flying, then fly VFR to the destination (assuming it is unlikely that the rest of the airplane will fall apart, leaving the pilot clutching the 396 and an empty yoke, like in the cartoons. What he is thinking of doing, is not telling anyone that his other stuff crapped out, and go ahead shooting a GPS approach to high minimums, and if the weather does not let him decide early to go visual, go missed. Yes, I figured. That would be an emergency procedure. This isn't an emergency yet. Don't make it one. Yes, it's likely that the 396 will do fine. But it may be "less than fine" in a surprising way, since it hasn't been tested in ways the FAA considers sufficient. I have issues with the FAA sometimes, but they also have their good points. Now here's where I don't understand the FAA's logic. I'm building an airplane. I can put in any non-certified equipment I want to including NAV equipment that is not new or yellowed tagged and "I" can certify that it is up to IFR standards. But... If I want a IFR GPS it has to be installed to the standard of the TSO (Can't remember number). Basicly Garmin gould build a device that derived it's information from VOR/LOC/NDB/GS to the same standard as the 1/2/396 and I could fly IFR with it. But because they use GPS I can't. |
#123
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jonathan Goodish wrote:
I haven't had any of these issues on the PDA, so it makes me wonder if the Bluetooth issues are related to WindowsXP. I know that I can't get my WindowsXP laptop to maintain a steady WiFi connection no matter what I do... it's good for a random period of time, and then it drops and resets. Have no such problem with WiFi on the iPaq or with my Apple-branded laptop. Its not XP, its the firmware in your device... |
#124
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Darrel Toepfer wrote: I haven't had any of these issues on the PDA, so it makes me wonder if the Bluetooth issues are related to WindowsXP. I know that I can't get my WindowsXP laptop to maintain a steady WiFi connection no matter what I do... it's good for a random period of time, and then it drops and resets. Have no such problem with WiFi on the iPaq or with my Apple-branded laptop. Its not XP, its the firmware in your device... Yes, I think the LInksys PC Card is the problem. JKG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Amateur Review of the Garmin GPSMAP 296 GPS | Rhett | Piloting | 10 | March 23rd 05 01:16 AM |
Pirep: Garmin GPSMAP 296 versus 295. (very long) | Jon Woellhaf | Piloting | 12 | September 4th 04 11:55 PM |
Amateur Review of the Garmin GPSMAP 296 GPS | Rhett | Products | 10 | April 29th 04 06:57 AM |
Garmin DME arc weidnress | Dave Touretzky | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | October 2nd 03 02:04 AM |
Garmin 90 Database Updates Discontinued | Val Christian | Piloting | 14 | August 20th 03 09:32 PM |