A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Moving Map: North-Up vs. Track-Up



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old July 25th 05, 05:17 PM
Kyler Laird
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Robert M. Gary" writes:

I teach track up. I would have you rotate your paper charts so they
show track up. I think its much less confusing.


And it prevents boredom in holds.

--kyler
  #12  
Old July 25th 05, 06:04 PM
Peter R.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Kai Glaesner wrote:

Reason was he wanted
the screen helping him to build a "mental-picture" about what's ahead and
around.


Track up.

I have both NEXRAD (actually WSI's NOWRAD) and traffic displayed on an
MX20. Combine these two with projected GPS course line and predicted
actual track while flying an IFR approach and IME track up provides a much
more intuitive situational picture.

I do not have to perform mental gymnastics of flipping the picture in my
head when scanning the MX20 during the approach.

--
Peter
























----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
  #13  
Old July 25th 05, 06:06 PM
Peter R.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

ShawnD2112 wrote:

Male preference is for north-up while female
preference is for track-up, generally (all who are going to add how they are
an exception can save the typing - this is a gross generalization).


Gross generalization or not, where did you get this theory? I suppose you
don't have an Internet reference to educate those of us equipped with an
apparent female preference, eh?

--
Peter
























----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
  #14  
Old July 25th 05, 06:11 PM
kontiki
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

AES wrote:
Seems to me, as a broad general proposition:

1) Consistent use of North up is better for longer-term navigation or
course planning, when you're zoomed out on the map and asking, "Where am
I in the big picture?" or "What course should I take to reach a given
(distant) destination?" (or to avoid things I should avoid).

Better chance of identifying major landmarks (lakes, mountain peaks)
correctly and understanding the broad situation.

2) Track up better for short-term maneuvering, when you're asking "What
should I be looking for, and what maneuver do I have to make, in the
next few minutes?"


Excellent analysis. This is why I use both sectional/Low Alt chart and GPS.
I always fold the map(s) to a reasonable sized rectangle to get the big
picture enroute, alwyas North Up. The GPS is Track Up but a much smaller
area than the sectiona and/or Low Alt. chart. I can always tilt the chart
as needed if I want a track relative view, no biggie.

Situational awareness is the key... whatever works go for it. But I never
fly without charts, even though I do love the GPS, I still follow my progress
on the chart.

  #15  
Old July 25th 05, 06:34 PM
Peter R.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

kontiki wrote:

But I never
fly without charts, even though I do love the GPS, I still follow my progress
on the chart.


I agree. During a series of very long flights across the US, I found the
VFR WACs extremely valuable in assisting with actual fuel consumption as
well as the usual array of valuables the charts offer.

Flying west across the US last May, I often received direct to a waypoint
(always VORs) that was one-to-many waypoints deep into my flight plan.
This would "cut a corner or two" off my flight plan, saving me a few
minutes, but it always threw off my planned fuel usage.

Due to the length of each flight, it was important to me to compare actual
to planned fuel usage at each waypoint. Using the WACs, I was able to
create a virtual waypoint directly along my new course that approximated
the skipped VOR.

As I crossed this virtual waypoint (defined by a radial off the skipped
VOR), I would note it in the flight log and then compare actual to planned
fuel usage.


--
Peter
























----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
  #16  
Old July 25th 05, 06:40 PM
Barney Rubble
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Erm, He's talking about the Garmin-430 GPS....

"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
oups.com...
Buy a GPS. It will do this for you, you just read the position off the
GPS.



  #17  
Old July 25th 05, 06:44 PM
Sylvain
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Robert M. Gary wrote:
I teach track up. I would have you rotate your paper charts so they
show track up. I think its much less confusing.

-Robert, CFI


funny how this topic keeps coming back; it seems that it depends
on how your brain is wired and that is not much you can do change
someone's mind about that; for me, north up is much less confusing
than having to twist the chart around, even if the chart does the
twisting for me (and change the orientation of the labels) as would
a GPS moving map display do because I do the twisting in
my head anyway, looking at a chart / display with track up forces
me to do a 'double twisting' of sort if you see what I mean :-)
Reminds me of endless hours of fun (i.e., arguments) while driving
around the country with an *ex* girlfriend of mine... :-)

--Sylvain
  #18  
Old July 25th 05, 07:18 PM
George Patterson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Robert M. Gary wrote:
I teach track up. I would have you rotate your paper charts so they
show track up. I think its much less confusing.


You wouldn't have been my instructor for long.

George Patterson
Why do men's hearts beat faster, knees get weak, throats become dry,
and they think irrationally when a woman wears leather clothing?
Because she smells like a new truck.
  #19  
Old July 25th 05, 08:00 PM
JohnH
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Peter R. wrote:
ShawnD2112 wrote:

Male preference is for north-up while female
preference is for track-up, generally (all who are going to add how
they are an exception can save the typing - this is a gross
generalization).


Gross generalization or not, where did you get this theory? I
suppose you don't have an Internet reference to educate those of us
equipped with an apparent female preference, eh?


I doubt he can supply a link to his theory source unless his ass has an IP
connection.


  #20  
Old July 25th 05, 09:31 PM
Doug
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I went to track up because if I loose vacuum, all I need to do is keep
the line pointed straight up in the GPS screen, and I am not turning.
Also, my unit, a KLN90B favors track up. I don't get an "airplane" icon
in the other track postions (I get a diamond).

But seriously, you can use the track up line as a poor man's localizer
needle. Try it and see.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Air Ops North Atlantic - Ron Knott Greasy Rider© @invalid.com Naval Aviation 1 June 4th 05 06:52 PM
Pirep: Garmin GPSMAP 296 versus 295. (very long) Jon Woellhaf Piloting 12 September 4th 04 11:55 PM
Moving to Alaska, anyone need glider transported north from NM Jeff Landfield Soaring 0 July 9th 04 04:46 AM
The battle for Arlington Airport begins? Paul Adriance Home Built 45 March 30th 04 11:41 PM
N. Korea Agrees to Nuke Talks Dav1936531 Military Aviation 1 August 2nd 03 06:53 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.