![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Robert M. Gary" writes:
I teach track up. I would have you rotate your paper charts so they show track up. I think its much less confusing. And it prevents boredom in holds. --kyler |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kai Glaesner wrote:
Reason was he wanted the screen helping him to build a "mental-picture" about what's ahead and around. Track up. I have both NEXRAD (actually WSI's NOWRAD) and traffic displayed on an MX20. Combine these two with projected GPS course line and predicted actual track while flying an IFR approach and IME track up provides a much more intuitive situational picture. I do not have to perform mental gymnastics of flipping the picture in my head when scanning the MX20 during the approach. -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ShawnD2112 wrote:
Male preference is for north-up while female preference is for track-up, generally (all who are going to add how they are an exception can save the typing - this is a gross generalization). Gross generalization or not, where did you get this theory? I suppose you don't have an Internet reference to educate those of us equipped with an apparent female preference, eh? -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
AES wrote:
Seems to me, as a broad general proposition: 1) Consistent use of North up is better for longer-term navigation or course planning, when you're zoomed out on the map and asking, "Where am I in the big picture?" or "What course should I take to reach a given (distant) destination?" (or to avoid things I should avoid). Better chance of identifying major landmarks (lakes, mountain peaks) correctly and understanding the broad situation. 2) Track up better for short-term maneuvering, when you're asking "What should I be looking for, and what maneuver do I have to make, in the next few minutes?" Excellent analysis. This is why I use both sectional/Low Alt chart and GPS. I always fold the map(s) to a reasonable sized rectangle to get the big picture enroute, alwyas North Up. The GPS is Track Up but a much smaller area than the sectiona and/or Low Alt. chart. I can always tilt the chart as needed if I want a track relative view, no biggie. Situational awareness is the key... whatever works go for it. But I never fly without charts, even though I do love the GPS, I still follow my progress on the chart. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
kontiki wrote:
But I never fly without charts, even though I do love the GPS, I still follow my progress on the chart. I agree. During a series of very long flights across the US, I found the VFR WACs extremely valuable in assisting with actual fuel consumption as well as the usual array of valuables the charts offer. Flying west across the US last May, I often received direct to a waypoint (always VORs) that was one-to-many waypoints deep into my flight plan. This would "cut a corner or two" off my flight plan, saving me a few minutes, but it always threw off my planned fuel usage. Due to the length of each flight, it was important to me to compare actual to planned fuel usage at each waypoint. Using the WACs, I was able to create a virtual waypoint directly along my new course that approximated the skipped VOR. As I crossed this virtual waypoint (defined by a radial off the skipped VOR), I would note it in the flight log and then compare actual to planned fuel usage. -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Erm, He's talking about the Garmin-430 GPS....
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message oups.com... Buy a GPS. It will do this for you, you just read the position off the GPS. ![]() |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert M. Gary wrote:
I teach track up. I would have you rotate your paper charts so they show track up. I think its much less confusing. -Robert, CFI funny how this topic keeps coming back; it seems that it depends on how your brain is wired and that is not much you can do change someone's mind about that; for me, north up is much less confusing than having to twist the chart around, even if the chart does the twisting for me (and change the orientation of the labels) as would a GPS moving map display do because I do the twisting in my head anyway, looking at a chart / display with track up forces me to do a 'double twisting' of sort if you see what I mean :-) Reminds me of endless hours of fun (i.e., arguments) while driving around the country with an *ex* girlfriend of mine... :-) --Sylvain |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert M. Gary wrote:
I teach track up. I would have you rotate your paper charts so they show track up. I think its much less confusing. You wouldn't have been my instructor for long. George Patterson Why do men's hearts beat faster, knees get weak, throats become dry, and they think irrationally when a woman wears leather clothing? Because she smells like a new truck. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter R. wrote:
ShawnD2112 wrote: Male preference is for north-up while female preference is for track-up, generally (all who are going to add how they are an exception can save the typing - this is a gross generalization). Gross generalization or not, where did you get this theory? I suppose you don't have an Internet reference to educate those of us equipped with an apparent female preference, eh? I doubt he can supply a link to his theory source unless his ass has an IP connection. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I went to track up because if I loose vacuum, all I need to do is keep
the line pointed straight up in the GPS screen, and I am not turning. Also, my unit, a KLN90B favors track up. I don't get an "airplane" icon in the other track postions (I get a diamond). But seriously, you can use the track up line as a poor man's localizer needle. Try it and see. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Ops North Atlantic - Ron Knott | Greasy Rider© @invalid.com | Naval Aviation | 1 | June 4th 05 06:52 PM |
Pirep: Garmin GPSMAP 296 versus 295. (very long) | Jon Woellhaf | Piloting | 12 | September 4th 04 11:55 PM |
Moving to Alaska, anyone need glider transported north from NM | Jeff Landfield | Soaring | 0 | July 9th 04 04:46 AM |
The battle for Arlington Airport begins? | Paul Adriance | Home Built | 45 | March 30th 04 11:41 PM |
N. Korea Agrees to Nuke Talks | Dav1936531 | Military Aviation | 1 | August 2nd 03 06:53 AM |