![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thomas Borchert wrote in
: Skywise, Luftanasa 737 Man, you need glasses or something. The spelling is "Lufthansa". And the plane is an Air France Airbus. Please pay at least minimal attention to the facts. Thank you. Please chill. I was more interested in letting members of the group know about the accident than trying to get an "A" in spelling. Also, you jumped on me a bit quick as I later posted corrections. I was simply repeating the 'facts' that were being reported at the time. When those 'facts' were changed, I posted those changes. Don't kill the messenger. Brian -- http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html Blog: http://www.skywise711.com/Blog Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes? |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Verna" wrote in message
news:Z19Ie.104424$%K2.36277@pd7tw1no... WELL ONE WROTE "GET A LIFE" AND THE OTHER WROTE "GET A GRIP" SO DOES THAT MAKE THEM BOTH BOTTOM FEEDERS???? Not necessarily, but posting in ALL CAPS merits some consideration for that award. Jay B |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thomas Borchert wrote:
Man, you need glasses or something. The spelling is "Lufthansa". And the plane is an Air France Airbus. Please pay at least minimal attention to the facts. Thank you. How about you try paying minimal attention to the thread. Way to criticize someone 11 hours after they already corrected themselves. You think the previous 70 posters didn't catch it? Post #1 (Tue, 02 Aug 2005 20:36:58 -0000) Skywise posts that CNN reports Lufthansa 737 crashed. Post #2 (Tue, 02 Aug 2005 20:45:28 -0000) Skywise corrects that plane is Air France. Post #3 (Tue, 02 Aug 2005 21:00:35 -0000) Skywise corrects that plane is A340. Post #77 (Wed, 03 Aug 2005 07:40:53 -0000) Thomas berates Skywise for getting the facts wrong. |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thomas Borchert wrote:
Matt, It was a tonque-in-cheek comment. In that case, sorry. No way for me to get it. Maybe I should have taken that pill before going online ;-) Althought it would be very ironic if it did turn out to be related to that, but I have to believe that they did some pretty exhausting testing of the FBW during certification. Matt |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Happy Dog wrote:
Does it have to do with the attendant paperwork? Declaring an emergency means a whole bunch of paperwork. The few times I've had a potentially serious problem, ATC treated it as a potentially serious situation. In one case it required rerouting landing airliner traffic. And, declaring an emergency, for the pilot, means you can do pretty much anything you need to, such as breaking regulations, to save the day. Isn't that what we're taught? What paperwork? This is one of those urban legends that just won't die. Matt |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mortimer Schnerd, RN wrote:
Matt Barrow wrote: As it turned out, the landing was uneventful except for all the fire trucks that followed me down the runway and taxiways. You musta felt like the Pied Piper! It was a strange sensation. My biggest fear was the controls would suddenly become free when somebody tested them. I didn't want anybody to think I had just pulled a stunt for the thrill of it. But it was definitely still buggered up when they were tested. It was a little later that they suddenly popped free. What did they find was the problem? Somebody leave a tool behind or something? Matt |
#87
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave wrote:
Air France will need a new 340 however... Hi! I'm not sure of this... Air France was rather in the move of less 340s and more 777s and 330s (which is, I think a good choice!) Hope we get the good factual information on the crashfrom the TSB of Canada soon! French TV was hardly informative tonight, with the usual 15 minutes of "impressions" from passengers, people on ground etc... Cheers Stanislas -- remplacez "lesptt" par "laposte" pour me joindre substitute "laposte" to "lesptt" to reach me |
#88
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
Happy Dog wrote: Does it have to do with the attendant paperwork? What paperwork? This is one of those urban legends that just won't die. http://www.avweb.com/news/system/183214-1.html Is this article substantially incorrect? moo |
#89
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mortimer Schnerd, RN"
Paperwork for who? I had a situation where I had rolled a T-34B and while I was inverted, apparently got something stuck in the controls. The stick was jammed partway to one side. It took a lot of effort on the stick along with mucho rudder to keep the aircraft straight and level. I of course immediately declared an emergency. As it turned out, the landing was uneventful except for all the fire trucks that followed me down the runway and taxiways. Thank God the stick was still stuck when one of the emergency bigwigs tried it, because shortly after that the obstruction amazingly disappeared after some manipulation. I don't recall having to do any paperwork at all, ouside of a note to maintenance suggesting they really go over the control system before anybody else flew it. http://www.avweb.com/news/system/183214-1.html moo |
#90
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt Barrow wrote:
I thought P-P-P was equivalent to "MAYDAY", which (I thought??) is an abbreviation for declaring an emergency. I would put it this way: Both are emergencies, but P-P-P means it's not a critical situation yet. You're crossing the Atlantic and start losing a little fuel, that might be a P-P-P alert. The fuel leak grows to the point that you know you can't make it, that's definitely a Mayday. P-P-P is probably rarely used by GA pilots. But airline pilots do use it to alert ATC as to just how serious _they_ think the situation is. Perhaps this is because a full airliner emergency might have a larger affect on airport or airspace operations. (GA planes can safely land in a small grass field if they lose power... jetliners can't.) For example, remember Swiss Air 111 that caught fire and then crashed off Newfoundland before they could land? (Basically because they followed the book and circled dumping fuel... so as not to be over landing weight... but the time wasted doing that killed them all.) Anyway, their calls went something like the following, going from what they thought was "just" an urgent situation, then to life or death: 10:14PM - "Swissair 111 heavy is declaring Pan Pan Pan. We have smoke in the cockpit. Request deviate immediate right turn to a convenient place. I guess Boston..." 10:24PM - "We are declaring an Emergency. We have to land immediately." 10:30PM - crashes into the sea Best, Kev |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pilots | Slick | Piloting | 4 | November 20th 04 11:21 AM |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 117 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Piloting | 114 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
F15E's trounced by Eurofighters | John Cook | Military Aviation | 193 | April 11th 04 03:33 AM |
Rwy incursions | Hankal | Piloting | 10 | November 16th 03 02:33 AM |