![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No point in trying to vote against any of them. Just move away.
Watching their tax base disappear can have a salutary effect on politicians. Heck, why do you think we call the Washington State Legislature the Idaho Economic Development Council? I bet that Jeb Bush is very grateful to the governors of both parties of those states that just passed huge estate tax increases. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ken Chaddock" wrote in message news:OAtOe.152206$wr.3134@clgrps12... Greg wrote: "Brien K. Meehan" wrote: "Clinton's amendment, also sponsored by Sens. Richard Durbin (D-Ill.), Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.), Jon Corzine (D-N.J.), Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Joe Lieberman (D-Conn.), requires the government to undertake as assessment of the dangers posed to high-risk, large populations and critical infrastructure areas should GA aircraft be stolen and used as a weapon." In theory, this doesn't sound all bad. We've been saying all along that GA is a small risk and that the FRZ is unwarranted. If they actually study it, they might find that out. Right. Well this is admittedly a wild-assed guess, but I would suppose the "conclusions" of such a study are already known quite clearly. Too true...but they have a point...put even a small thermonuclear device in a Cessena 150 and.... :-O ! ....Put even a small thermonuclear device in a __________________ (Insert Transport Medium Of HERE) and....:-o ! |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jay Honeck wrote: No, nothing has changed here since 9/11, either, except during election years. Then we can't spit without hitting a candidate, and TFRs hit Iowa like Scud missiles... That would suck. Democrats don't bother to campaign here, they can't win. Our one Congressman sent us all a letter in April of 2004 and said that was the last we'd be hearing from him as far as campaigning was concerned. He didn't spend a nickel after that and still clobbered the tomato can the Democrats offered up. If you didn't watch the national news and therefore didn't have to watch the ads of Bush and Kerry you would never have known there was an election. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]() George Patterson wrote: Newps wrote: The only thing that changed post 9/11 is the FBO now locks their door to the parking lot after 11 pm. And what will happen to that FBO if this commission causes Congress to order that you have to go through airline-class security before being allowed to fly your plane? Schumer, who happens to be one of the sponsors of this bill, is on record as saying that that's what should be done. It'll never pass. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ken Chaddock wrote:
Too true...but they have a point...put even a small thermonuclear device in a Cessena 150 and.... :-O ! Put a thermonuclear device in a Ford Escort and.... :-O ! It can carry a bigger one than the Cessna can. George Patterson Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to use the Internet and he won't bother you for weeks. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Newps wrote:
It'll never pass. Let's hope you're right. George Patterson Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to use the Internet and he won't bother you for weeks. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
George Patterson wrote:
Put a thermonuclear device in a Ford Escort and.... :-O ! It can carry a bigger one than the Cessna can. It is rational to do a security assessment in a relative way. Would you really expect rationality from such a study? - Andrew |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
W P Dixon wrote:
should take down the Battle Flag I don't recall this. What is "the Battle Flag"? - Andrew |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Andrew Gideon" wrote in message
online.com... W P Dixon wrote: should take down the Battle Flag I don't recall this. What is "the Battle Flag"? - Andrew The "Stars and Bars" ... Confederate Flag |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actually,
The "Stars and Bars" was a different flag, but don't fret..alot of people get them confused. The Stars and Bars was the nickname of the first flag of the Confederate States (March 1861- May 1863), but it was a reason the Confederate Army adopted the Battle Flag. During a heated battle the Stars and Bars could look like the Stars and Stripes, and the soldiers wanted a flag they could see and recognize in battle. The Battle Flag never flew for the Government of the Confederate States, it only flew on the field of battle for the men fighting . And just for the history lessons sake ![]() Battle Flag was really a square shaped flag, the copies you see today of it would actually be a Naval Jack. Patrick student SPL aircraft structural mech "Jay Beckman" wrote in message news:zvJOe.124599$E95.85385@fed1read01... "Andrew Gideon" wrote in message online.com... W P Dixon wrote: should take down the Battle Flag I don't recall this. What is "the Battle Flag"? - Andrew The "Stars and Bars" ... Confederate Flag |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Airmens' Freedoms Threatened by Harsh Congressional Proposals | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 24 | July 29th 05 06:15 PM |
"10km / only once" amendment | K.P. Termaat | Soaring | 21 | June 30th 04 02:59 PM |
Hillary's visit to Afghanistan | JD | Military Aviation | 0 | December 9th 03 03:23 AM |
L.A. Times -- Request and Amendment | Blueskies | Home Built | 0 | August 11th 03 02:35 AM |
L.A. Times -- Request and Amendment | Blueskies | Piloting | 0 | August 11th 03 02:35 AM |