![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
such as trying to dead
horse head in the bed technique first? That's a new technique to me. What website do =you= visit? ![]() Jose -- He who laughs, lasts. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message oups.com... I can't see diddly on a sectional anymore without holding it four inches from my eyes. Can anyone recommend "progressive" bi-focals? How about TRI-focals? Any benefit there? -- I use trifocals. Got them because I wanted to see the instrument panel for IFR without having to twist my head from side-to-side (vertigo inducing) and also see approach plates up close. I also spend a lot of time in front of a large computer screen. Two things make them work for me: 1) The middle lens is set to focus at about 18" (~instrument panel and/or CRT distance), which I believe is a bit non-standard, and 2) the middle lens is 10mm high, which is very non-standard. They'll try to tell you that 7mm is all that is available, but this is not true. Settle for nothing less than the 10mm height. That plus insisting that the frames are adjusted perfectly so the left and right eyes are always looking through the same near/middle/far lens makes them easy for me to use and adjust to. The top of the middle lens appears about 10 degrees below my horizon, which I find about right. Deane Judd 1977 Cessna R172K (XP) N1514V |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
I have my Class 2 renewal in January and have been wondering what a difference the presbyopia that I started noticing in low light a couple of years back will make in my vision test. Thankfully my distance vision has thus remained 20/20 and except for the low-light small text presbyopia thing,,, my near vision is quite good. Yeah, my near-vision has gone completely to crap in the last few years. I still don't wear bi-focals, but both my eye and medical doctors told me that my days are, indeed, numbered. I can't see diddly on a sectional anymore without holding it four inches from my eyes. Can anyone recommend "progressive" bi-focals? How about TRI-focals? Any benefit there? -- I wear progressive TRI-focals and do not have any difficulty with the constant shift of reading panel dials and outside scanning. The only time I've had any discomfort is flying with foggles or under the hood. After ten or fifteen minutes (as during a VFR review) I tend to get a git nauseous(sp?). Don't know if that's a vision problem or an inner ear problem. The good news is I have no intention of getting my instrument rating. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/12/05 6:04 PM, in article
, "Jose" wrote: such as trying to dead horse head in the bed technique first? That's a new technique to me. What website do =you= visit? ![]() Jose You haven't seen "The Godfather"? -- Jeff 'The Wizard of Draws' Bucchino Cartoons with a Touch of Magic http://www.wizardofdraws.com More Cartoons with a Touch of Magic http://www.cartoonclipart.com |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 23:30:49 GMT, "Deane Judd"
wrote in : : I use trifocals. Got them because I wanted to see the instrument panel for IFR without having to twist my head from side-to-side (vertigo inducing) and also see approach plates up close. I also spend a lot of time in front of a large computer screen. Two things make them work for me: 1) The middle lens is set to focus at about 18" (~instrument panel and/or CRT distance), which I believe is a bit non-standard, and 2) the middle lens is 10mm high, which is very non-standard. They'll try to tell you that 7mm is all that is available, but this is not true. Settle for nothing less than the 10mm height. That plus insisting that the frames are adjusted perfectly so the left and right eyes are always looking through the same near/middle/far lens makes them easy for me to use and adjust to. The top of the middle lens appears about 10 degrees below my horizon, which I find about right. I agree completely. During instrument training, I found trifocals necessary to deal with my nearsighted and farsightedness. I had the optician make the middle segment 12mm high and position it so that the top of it is higher than normal, positioned where the windshield and control panel meet while I'm looking out the windshield normally. The bottom segment is only used for reading the finest print on the chart in dim illumination. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay,
My General Physician warned me that if my blood pressure went any lower that he would have to put me on medication. he declared open season on Salt! Michelle ;-) Jay Honeck wrote: Got the 3rd class medical renewed a coupla days ago. Blood pressu NORMAL. Yeah, baby -- and without meds! Whoo-hoo! :-) |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
Can anyone recommend "progressive" bi-focals? The best results I've gotten are from these. I've tried the type of bifocals that have a small circular reading section. Hated them because I had to move my head back and forth to read. I tried trifocals. These were fine during the day, but one of the lines went right across the brake lights of cars in front of me at night, unless I held my head perfectly (and uncomfortably) upright. The type I have are called by a name similar to "natural", but, of course, I don't recall what it is. From your post, though, it seems that your normal vision is ok -- you just need reading glasses. If this is correct, you might consider getting a pair of half glasses. Look straight out or up for distance vision; down through the lenses to read. An A&P I know has these and swears by them. These would be a *lot* cheaper than progressives. George Patterson Drink is the curse of the land. It makes you quarrel with your neighbor. It makes you shoot at your landlord. And it makes you miss him. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jose wrote:
Progressives have a blurry area right in the middle, .... Mine do not. Basically, you can look at a picture about the height of your chin on a wall 20' away, hold your head in an upright position, and walk towards the picture. It will stay in focus all the way to the wall. What they *do* have is blurred areas on the sides. There's a band of distance vision across the top of the lens, but the band of clear vision narrows as you go down the lens. Can't look at the girls out of the corner of your eyes. :-( It's hard to be a dirty old man with progressive lenses. George Patterson Drink is the curse of the land. It makes you quarrel with your neighbor. It makes you shoot at your landlord. And it makes you miss him. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sylvain wrote:
what did you do that worked? Jay has this fruit diet that's a real winner. Eat as much fruit as you want all day long except for supper. Eat anything you want for supper, but only fruit the rest of the day. George Patterson Drink is the curse of the land. It makes you quarrel with your neighbor. It makes you shoot at your landlord. And it makes you miss him. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You haven't seen "The Godfather"?
No. He made me an offer I couldn't refuse. Jose -- He who laughs, lasts. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Ten Years of Flying | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 20 | February 19th 05 02:05 PM |
HAVE YOU HEARD THE GOOD NEWS! | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | January 26th 05 07:08 PM |
millionaire on the Internet... in weeks! | Malcolm Austin | Soaring | 0 | November 5th 04 11:14 PM |
bulding a kitplane maybe Van's RV9A --- a good idea ????? | Flightdeck | Home Built | 10 | September 9th 03 07:20 PM |