A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Private Planes: Freedom, Security, and Responsibility



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old December 15th 05, 01:40 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Private Planes: Freedom, Security, and Responsibility

§ 25.365 Pressurized compartment loads.
Look it up yourself, FAR 25 under pressure, the formula
given is based on cabin cross section, with 20 sq. ft as a
maximum required. A sq. ft = 144 sq.in. a .45 caliber
bullet is 0.1592611875 sq.in or 18083 bullet holes for 20
sq. ft.

A 45 ACP bullet is 230 grains and a loaded cartridge weight
is about 400 grains. An ounce is 437.5 grains and
therefore, about 16 bullets to a pound. 18,000 ounces of
cartridges is 1130 pounds and a half ton is only 1,000
pounds. If you only consider the bullets, it would be a
little less than a half ton, but bullets without cases,
powder, etc are just lumps.


--
James H. Macklin
ATP,CFI,A&P




"Jack" wrote in message
. net...
| Jim Macklin wrote:
|
| FAR 25 requires that the pressurized aircraft be able to
| withstand explosions, engine disintegration and maintain
a
| livable cabin with a 20 sq. ft. hole. That size hole
would
| require about 1/2 a ton of bullets.
|
| Cite?
|
| A hole the size of a twin bed is pretty BIG!
|
|
| Jack


  #42  
Old December 15th 05, 03:17 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Private Planes: Freedom, Security, and Responsibility


"Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message
oups.com...
Except for the "737 jumbojet" the rest of the article is well written.


Umm....that was a remark from the omniscient MSM he was "quoting".


  #43  
Old December 15th 05, 03:25 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Private Planes: Freedom, Security, and Responsibility

Gig 601XL Builder wrote:

Do you have a cite for that?


It's mentioned frequently in older books on aviation. Check out "Fate is the
Hunter" or Ernie Gann's autobiography for starters. Gann retired from commercial
aviation in the late 50s, and pilots were still required to carry pistols in
their flight bags.

George Patterson
Coffee is only a way of stealing time that should by rights belong to
your slightly older self.
  #45  
Old December 15th 05, 02:28 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Private Planes: Freedom, Security, and Responsibility

On 2005-12-14, Skylune wrote:
I also "suspect" this could have been done with MS Flight Sim. But, that
is not what really happened. Fact: The terrorists trained at GA schools.


A fact, but it's totally irrelevant. Given most of the terrorists didn't
have any kind of criminal record and at the time were in the United
States perfectly legally, there is no way you could have denied them
training unless you imposed a rule 'brown skinned people and foreigners
are not to be trained'. Even with today's TSA rules, these people would
have been approved for training.

--
Dylan Smith, Port St Mary, Isle of Man
Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net
Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de
Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net
  #46  
Old December 15th 05, 02:30 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Private Planes: Freedom, Security, and Responsibility

On 2005-12-14, Skylune wrote:
Jim: The requirements for non citizens are new (post 9/11/01), aren't
they? They seem pretty reasonable to me.


Except they would have been pointless then - even if those regulations
existed then, the terrorists would have all been approved.

--
Dylan Smith, Port St Mary, Isle of Man
Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net
Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de
Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net
  #47  
Old December 15th 05, 02:48 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Private Planes: Freedom, Security, and Responsibility

by Dylan Smith Dec 15, 2005 at 02:30 PM


On 2005-12-14, Skylune wrote:
Jim: The requirements for non citizens are new (post 9/11/01), aren't
they? They seem pretty reasonable to me.


Except they would have been pointless then - even if those regulations
existed then, the terrorists would have all been approved.

Why? Jim M stated that flight schools are now required to verify US
citizenship, and not train non-citizens until they are approved by TSA.
If this is true, why would the terrorists have been approved?




  #48  
Old December 15th 05, 03:05 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Private Planes: Freedom, Security, and Responsibility

The most notable attempt was a FedEx DC-10 in 1994,
where a disgruntled worker who was going to be fired attempted to kill
all three crew members and crash the plane into FedEx headquarters

IIRC that was motivated not by any overt act of terrorism but by the
wacko's plan that his kids would collect on his life insurance policy
if he died in a company acft. Of course, this wouldn't matter to the
people on the ground where the plane came down..

  #49  
Old December 15th 05, 03:11 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Private Planes: Freedom, Security, and Responsibility

Peter Clark wrote:

"Debt of Honor" (paperback was published June 1994, I can't seem to
find the publish date for the hardcover offhand, but was likely late
93/early 94).


Amazon is reporting the hard-cover publishing date as August 17, 1994.


--
Peter
  #50  
Old December 15th 05, 03:41 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Private Planes: Freedom, Security, and Responsibility


"Skylune" wrote in message
lkaboutaviation.com...
by Dylan Smith Dec 15, 2005 at 02:30 PM



On 2005-12-14, Skylune wrote:
Jim: The requirements for non citizens are new (post 9/11/01), aren't
they? They seem pretty reasonable to me.


Except they would have been pointless then - even if those regulations
existed then, the terrorists would have all been approved.

Why? Jim M stated that flight schools are now required to verify US
citizenship, and not train non-citizens until they are approved by TSA.
If this is true, why would the terrorists have been approved?


I think the more important question is, why would they have not been
approved?


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
American nazi pond scum, version two bushite kills bushite Naval Aviation 0 December 21st 04 10:46 PM
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! [email protected] Naval Aviation 2 December 17th 04 09:45 PM
TSA requirement of Security Awareness Training dancingstar Piloting 3 October 5th 04 02:17 AM
What's Wrong with Economics and how can it be Fixed What's Wrong with Economics and how can it be Fixe Naval Aviation 5 August 21st 04 12:50 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.