![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John Gaquin" wrote in message
... "Jon Woellhaf" wrote in message I recommend as a good argument starter, "High wing airplanes are superior to low wing airplanes." It's true, you know. Jon...... Pandora. Pandora...... Jon. Jon, put the cover back on the damned box and give it back to her. Oh, let then argue about it. The're just doing it because they don't want to admit that they can't handle an airplane with the third wheel in the back where it belongs. :-) -- Geoff the sea hawk at wow way d0t com remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply by mail Spell checking is left as an excercise for the reader. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe wrote:
I recommend as a good argument starter, "High wing airplanes are superior to low wing airplanes." It's true, you know. Jon...... Pandora. Pandora...... Jon. Jon, put the cover back on the damned box and give it back to her. Oh, let then argue about it. The're just doing it because they don't want to admit that they can't handle an airplane with the third wheel in the back where it belongs. No no no...it's not the location of the three wheels that is important. What makes it a *real* airplane (or more expensive come annual time) is whether or not the wheels go up and down :-) -- Jack Allison PP-ASEL-IA Student Arrow N2104T "When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the Earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been, and there you will always long to return" - Leonardo Da Vinci (Remove the obvious from address to reply via e-mail) |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jack Allison" wrote in message ....they can't handle an airplane with the third wheel in the back where it belongs. What makes it a *real* airplane ...is whether or not the wheels go up and down Or maybe...... real airplanes -- (the ones that really talk to you) -- have the third wheel in back, and round engine(s). Its not true aviation unless the airplane's [much] older than you are! |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 14 Jan 2006 12:41:38 -0800, "Bryan Porter"
wrote: Salutations All, I just finished my first introductory flight in a Diamond Katana. Cool... My $0.00...free advice... I'm not a software engineer, but I am a ham radio/electronics geek/radar & data-processing tech. DONT OVERANALYZE THE HECK OUT OF IT. I did, didnt help. Have fun, learn baby steps and you'll do well. Start studying for the written tes. I recommend www.faatest.com for test practice. Highly satisfied customer! FYI, I haven't flown the Katana, have flown the DA40. Similar but bigger. When you fly other planes you may find they need more rudder and more flare on landing...I found I could land the DA40 almost flat. Above all...HAVE FUN! --Don Don Byrer Radar Tech & Smilin' Commercial Pilot Guy Amateur Radio KJ5KB kj5kb-at-hotmail.com "I have slipped the surly bonds of earth; now if I can just land without bending the gear..." "Watch out for those doves...smack-smack-smack-smack..." |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]() PP Student - 0.5 Hours VFR! ;-) Ah-Ha! Now a "PP Student", no longer a prospective student. Well, that didn't take long. Welcome aboard. Al CFIAMI |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bryan Porter" ... wrote in message
oups.com... You know, not to feed the flames, but the Katana did seem pretty unstable - not dangerously unstable mind you, but very sports-car-ish. Of course, I've never flown a high wing, so I really don't know what I'm talking about here! Hey, something I can comment on. I just checked out in a Katana after completing my PP training in a C172. The Katana is definitely more sensitive in pitch than the 172... I don't believe that has much to do with high vs. low wing, but I'm no expert. I'm still trying to figure out how to land it properly. I'm flaring a lot later than in the 172, which is unnerving... It feels like I'm going to stuff the nose into the runway, but my instructor says that's the way. He tells me it's easier going from 172 to Katana than the other way around, but I can't say. Visibility is great, except to the right rear, which makes the turn to base on right pattern a little bit of a guessing game. The Katana is much more inclined to dip a wing during stalls than a 172, so I expect my rudder skills will improve. It's also approved for spins, so I can get a little spin training once I save up some rental money. -- Tom Young t e y o u n g 1 @ c o m c a s t . n e t (remove _this_ to reply) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
Logging approaches | Ron Garrison | Instrument Flight Rules | 109 | March 2nd 04 05:54 PM |
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 12th 03 11:01 PM |
Sim time loggable? | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | December 6th 03 07:47 AM |