![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks all .. got the picture..
Oz used to have a fuel levy, then it was cut and user pays introduced. Fuel did drop for about 6mths then went even higher when excise tax applied..(Federal Gov grabs circa 40% of fuel price then there is GST Tax, State charges etc got the picture) Lets not mention the efficiency of collecting piddling little amounts of landing fees.. Lesson there somewhere |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jonathan Goodish wrote: In article , Newps wrote: Jonathan Goodish wrote: Private funding of the ATC system is a good idea, It's only a good idea if the funding is stable. Nowhere that has user fees has a stable revenue stream. It varies widely from year to year. Trying prying millions of dollars from a bankrupt airline for their ATC payment. Canada has had these problems for years. This wouldn't be a problem if the bankrupt airlines would go under and stop flying. While this sounds sinister, new competitors would enter the market and provide greater stability--a much better situation than government subsidizing these loser carriers. However, employment stability in the private ATC system wouldn't be a sure thing. Pension? What pension? Welcome to the real world. We weren't talking about a private ATC system, just privatizing the source of the funding. Nobody is talking about taking ATC out of the government, that clearly doesn't work. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
That's what's so damned infuriating about this debate; people can't seem to understand that our existing fuel tax is *the* most efficient user fee one could imagine, requiring no further bureaucracy, no extra computer systems, no extra infrastructure of ANY kind in order to pay for any perceived "FAA shortfall". Yeah. All we need to do now is make it illegal for aircraft owners to haul in gas from outside. George Patterson Coffee is only a way of stealing time that should by rights belong to your slightly older self. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So, Jay, how much aviation fuel tax did you pay last year?
Not sure. Probably more than most, though, since every time we leave Iowa City (which we do a LOT), we are stuck buying that crappy Avgas. The real question is why more airports don't sell car gas -- with the av-tax added. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
The real question is why more airports don't sell car gas -- with the av-tax added. I asked that question at 47N when the management changed and they were deciding what fuels to offer. They polled the aircraft owners and determined that not enough people would buy it if they did. Most of the people who had mogas STCs would have continued to haul their own gas in to save money. George Patterson Coffee is only a way of stealing time that should by rights belong to your slightly older self. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
Bottom line: If my airport sold unleaded gasoline, I wouldn't need to haul the damned stuff in. And I believe you wouldn't have built the grape if unleaded had been available then and there. But now that you have that big tank in a pickup truck, you can't expect us to believe that you'd start paying avgas prices for mogas on the field. Decent fuel needs to be made available *and* owners must be banned from hauling gas in from outside to avoid the taxes. George Patterson Coffee is only a way of stealing time that should by rights belong to your slightly older self. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And I believe you wouldn't have built the grape if unleaded had been
available then and there. But now that you have that big tank in a pickup truck, you can't expect us to believe that you'd start paying avgas prices for mogas on the field. Decent fuel needs to be made available *and* owners must be banned from hauling gas in from outside to avoid the taxes. Agreed. The Mighty Grape will one day wear out -- it's got 125K on it, but still running great -- and I can only hope that I won't have to spend thousands to replace it. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
Agreed. The Mighty Grape will one day wear out -- it's got 125K on it, but still running great -- and I can only hope that I won't have to spend thousands to replace it. I've got 170,000 on mine, but it has a few problems. I'm in the process of checking to see if it's better to fix them or buy a new one. The latter is complicated by the fact that the sort of truck I want isn't common in this area, so I would have to shop several hundred miles away. Anyway, you've probably got a way to go yet. George Patterson Coffee is only a way of stealing time that should by rights belong to your slightly older self. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chris" wrote in message ... "Sylvain" wrote in message t... Jim Macklin wrote: Income taxes, fuel fees, some airport have landing, tie-down and other fees. But at the Federal level, so far, most services are paid from fuel and income taxes, as money is appropriated by Congress. same in other countries like UK, where taxes -- and quite a bit more than in US on the fuel alone -- pay for the same services; yet, it doesn't prevent them from asking for additional fees (twas 160 UK Pounds at the time when I got my PPL there, probably a heck of a lot more now); Our CAA has to be self funding therefore the costs are recovered from the users. A good example being that it costs me £16 to ask the CAA to verify my licence particulars to the FAA who then issue me with a nice plastic certificate for free. I like your way but I don't think it is sustainable in the long term. User fees are inevitable despite what AOPA think. We have USER FEES NOW. They are in the fuel tax. Our roads are done the same way. Works quite well and is fair because it is a pretty safe bet that the people using more fuel are probably using more services. If they need to increase revenue they should just increase the amount of the tax. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:yoEyf.708533$_o.236451@attbi_s71... So, Jay, how much aviation fuel tax did you pay last year? Not sure. Probably more than most, though, since every time we leave Iowa City (which we do a LOT), we are stuck buying that crappy Avgas. The real question is why more airports don't sell car gas -- with the av-tax added. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" Let's do the math. (Hours flown * Gal/Hr)*0.92 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GA User fees | Jose | Piloting | 48 | December 24th 05 02:12 AM |
Planes at Hanscom face turbulence caused by higher fees | Bill | Piloting | 3 | February 12th 05 04:46 PM |
NAA Fees to the US Team | Doug Jacobs | Soaring | 2 | October 29th 04 01:09 AM |
Fees at KFTW | Mike Noel | Piloting | 1 | November 23rd 03 11:18 PM |
Angel Flight pilots: Ever have an FBO refuse to wave landing fees? | Peter R. | Piloting | 11 | August 2nd 03 01:20 AM |