Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible

On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 00:28:07 GMT, TRUTH wrote:

The government's version is a conspiracy theory, since there's no
evidence to back it up. Therefore anyone believing the government's
version is a conspiracy theorist. You think there's evidence? Prove it

We all think your tinfoil hat is on too tight and has cut off circulation to
your brain. We don't really care if you ever accept reality. You're here to
convince us, not the other way around.

A psychotic goof ball posts drivel and fifty people give him what he wants!

And we wonder why Usenet is such a mess!!

On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 06:13:52 GMT, TRUTH wrote:

Chad Irby wrote in news:cirby-380196.00091223022006
:

In article ,
TRUTH wrote:

What you said is not factual.

Over the last few years, I've met more than a few people who were either
witnesses to the attacks or who helped reconstruct the whole thing.

On the other hand, you (the crazy person) have a few Web sites written
by other crazy people, and one "scientific" paper that you yourself
admit wasn't even peer reviewed (after falsely claiming that it was).



Read Dr Jones paper and show why his facts do not apply:
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html

Dr Jones isn't a structural engineer, he isn't a civil engineer; he's a
researcher in alterative energy sources. You demand qualifications from us but
ignore Dr. Jones' lack of qualifications and at the same time handwave away
statements from his own boss and the civil engineering department at his own
college.

The BYU physics department has issued a statement: "The university is
aware that Professor Steven Jones's hypotheses and interpretations of evidence
regarding the collapse of World Trade Center buildings are being questioned by a
number of scholars and practitioners, including many of BYU's own faculty
members. Professor Jones's department and college administrators are not
convinced that his analyses and hypotheses have been submitted to relevant
scientific venues that would ensure rigorous technical peer review."

The chairman of the BYU department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Dr.
Miller, is on record stating "I think without exception, the structural
engineering professors in our department are not in agreement with the claims
made by Jones in his paper, and they don't think there is accuracy and validity
to these claims."

"TRUTH" wrote in message
...
Pooh Bear wrote in
:



TRUTH wrote:

You can't provide the proof because there is no proof.

And you sir are a nothing more than a denialist.

Graham




Someday you'll wake up. My job with you is done

Indeed.

You have finally convinced him and everyone else reading this thread that you
are a delusional moron. You may go now.

'Bye.

Johnny Bravo wrote:

As for a precision maneuver, how Ernst Udet about picking up a hankerchief
sitting on a runway, using a wingtip, to win a bet with Hollywood starlet Mary
Pickford.

Compared to that a 360 degree dive is a piece of cake.

I would bet that he was a better pilot than Snoopy's nemisis, even
though Manfred was credited with more kills.

TRUTH wrote:

Did a 757 actually "vaporize into nothingness"? And if it did, what was
wreckage from a military aircraft doing there?

How did a 757 crash into the FIRST FLOOR of the Pentagon without
scorching the green lawn?

So, assuming it was a different aircraft, why didn't it scorch the green
lawn? Now you are suggesting that people didn't really see a plane crash?

"TRUTH" wrote:

in message ...
"Dan Luke" wrote in
:


"TRUTH" wrote in message
...
Pooh Bear wrote in
:



TRUTH wrote:

You can't provide the proof because there is no proof.

And you sir are a nothing more than a denialist.

Graham




Someday you'll wake up. My job with you is done

Indeed.

You have finally convinced him and everyone else reading this thread
that you are a delusional moron. You may go now.

'Bye.




And you are biggest asshole believing bin Laden did this from his cave.

You believe in proofless things! YOU'RE the moron, ****head! Go back to
la-la-land you stupid dope

I see I've got you foaming at the mouth. Now MY job is done.

By the way: are you ever going to answer Campbell's question about why 100%
of the pilots in these groups think your "aeronautical expert" is full of
****?

Pooh Bear wrote:


TRUTH wrote:


I am not a scientist..........But I can use science to disprove the absurd
government version


It is painnfully clear that science is way over your head.

You couldn't 'scientifically' find your way out of a brown paper bag.

Graham



He would deny there is any evidence there is even a bag.

venom wrote:

"Chad Irby" wrote in message
...


"Striker, listen, and you listen close: flying a plane is no different
than riding a bicycle, just a lot harder to put baseball cards in the
spokes."


"Oh, it's a big pretty white plane with a red stripes, curtains at the
windows, wheels, and it just looks like a big Tylenol. "


Was it in Radar range? Or was it in a RadarRange by Amana?

What can you make out of this?

"TRUTH" wrote:

"Dan Luke" wrote in


By the way: are you ever going to answer Campbell's question about why
100% of the pilots in these groups think your "aeronautical expert" is
full of ****?



Certainly I will answer it. 9/11 was such a terrible event, that thinking
our government was involved is very difficult. Most people therefore will
not think rationally when it comes to evidence. Most people will take the
government's side, even without evidence. They will even think that
evidence exists when it does not. They will do anything and everything in
their power to deny what happened.

I will admit that I'm much more familiar with the WTC attacks than the
Pentagon. And I am no pilot. But I am a clear thinker,...

Ok, now you're making me laugh.

...which obviously you are not.

Face it. 9/11 was an inside job. More and more money has been pouring
into the cause. More and more radio spots, more TV ads, more newspaper
coverage. Sooner or later, major newspapers will report it. The Movement
is expanding rapidly. Continued denial is not going to help

I see: 100% of a group of real experts on a subject think that your claims
are nonsense, yet you dismiss them with a wave of your hand. And it is
*they* who are in denial?

You are a crazy person--and not a very bright one.