United 93 -- see it!

tscottme wrote:
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
Yeah, I wouldn't want to be the idiot that tries to take over an
airliner again. He'd be ripped from stem to stern.


Unless the hijacker had the good fortune to find an aircraft full of
Democrats. Those passengers would apologize to the hijacker and offer to
fly it into the target of choice while massaging the feet of the hijacker.
After all, 10 generations ago some people the the West still owned slaves
and we haven't raised our minum wage, yadda, yadda, yadda.

Unless the hijacker let it be known that it was a Republican.

--
Lynn Wallace http://www.xmission.com/~lawall
I have nothing but contempt and anger for those who betray the
trust by exposing the name of our sources. They are, in my view,
the most insidious of traitors."
George H.W. Bush, April 16, 1999,

Jon Kraus wrote:
One thing that is for sure is that airline passengers will NEVER
let some ragheads take over a plane ever again....

Jon, I've never been a Muslim nor a Sikh. I've been a Baptist, a
Mormon and a Buddhist. You calling terrorists "ragheads" offended
me and probably a lot of others.

Back in the late 80's, I had two roommates, one was an Iraqi and the
other was an Iranian. They had friends visiting all the time and
you'd be surprised how many of them were blond-headed and blue-eyed
and speaking fluently both in English and in their native language. Oh
yes, they were clean cut and shaven.

When you are only thinking that your enemies are "ragheads", you
have already missed 30-40% of your potential threat. Yeah, and don't
forget people like Timothy McVeigh.

Another thing, Jon, if I was to come out the way you often do, I would
not advertise my tail number and where I park my plane. Just a
thought.

The Monk

Christ, another idiot troll...

-plonk-

--
Is it true that nothing can be known? If so how do we know this? -Woody Allen

"Raptor" wrote in message
...
tscottme wrote:
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
Yeah, I wouldn't want to be the idiot that tries to take over an
airliner again. He'd be ripped from stem to stern.


Unless the hijacker had the good fortune to find an aircraft full of
Democrats. Those passengers would apologize to the hijacker and offer to
fly it into the target of choice while massaging the feet of the
hijacker.
After all, 10 generations ago some people the the West still owned slaves
and we haven't raised our minum wage, yadda, yadda, yadda.

Unless the hijacker let it be known that it was a Republican.

Funny, isn't it, that the Democrats are the one who are so cozy with the
Islamofascists (Dick "Turban" Durbin, Jay Rockefeller, for example). So who
more represents Gang Bangers, headhackers?

Lynn Wallace http://www.xmission.com/~lawall
I have nothing but contempt and anger for those who betray the
trust by exposing the name of our sources. They are, in my view,
the most insidious of traitors."
George H.W. Bush, April 16, 1999

Another clueless one.

If Western Civilization was a person, Islam would be the AIDS virus and
liberalism would be a clinical depression leading toward suicide.

Hee hee!

No matter what you may think of this post, you have to admit: That's
pretty good...

;-)

(Or, as Jimmy Doolittle says to our protaganist in "Pearl Harbor":
"That's bull****, boy! But....it's very, very good, bull****...")
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

Morgans wrote:

I suspect
it will not be a box office smash, for the reasons stated, but that it will
be a successful movie.

Will probably only be a draw in the US.

Graham

On 5 May 2006 10:11:07 -0700, "Typhoon502" wrote:

I know people will say it's important or
"you HAVE to go see it" (

No, no! That's not it!

This is a great film *despite* all that other stuff. This is a great
film, period. It is not an educational film, nor a patriotic film (it
may be that as well), nor a catharic film (it may be that as well), it
is pure and simple a great piece of movie-making.

For God's sake, it was so good that it inspired Rob Arndt to write an
intelligent response to it! How often have you seen that happen?



-- all the best, Dan Ford

email: usenet AT danford DOT net

Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com
Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com
In Search of Lost Time: www.readingproust.com

My apologies to rec.aviation.piloting for crossposting this. I forgot
that this would inevitably expose you to the mad responses that are
typical on rec.aviation.military.


-- all the best, Dan Ford

email: usenet AT danford DOT net

Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com
Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com
In Search of Lost Time: www.readingproust.com

"Pooh Bear" wrote in message
...


Morgans wrote:

I suspect
it will not be a box office smash, for the reasons stated, but
that it will
be a successful movie.

Will probably only be a draw in the US.

United 93 is getting good reviews here in Canada. According to one I
heard on Radio 1, it is understated, not at all bombastic and
inspiring.
--
Andrew Chaplin
SIT MIHI GLADIUS SICUT SANCTO MARTINO
(If you're going to e-mail me, you'll have to get "yourfinger." out.)

Pooh Bear wrote:
Morgans wrote:

I suspect
it will not be a box office smash, for the reasons stated, but that it will
be a successful movie.

Will probably only be a draw in the US.

Graham

I say it will make alot of profit over-seas and via viedo rental and
sales.

The Monk