A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The new Pentagon video



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old May 17th 06, 10:30 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The new Pentagon video

I'm convinced that the Dukes of Hazard (the TV show, not the recent movie)
was directly responsible for the death of the woman who tried to jump the
gap in the Bay Bridge during the Loma Prieta Earthquake in 1989. In the TV
show the good-ol'-boy heros were always jumping the General Lee over stuff,
without any sign of a ramp. When the bridge in front of her collapsed, the
woman decided to try and jump the 50-foot gap rather than stop her car and
wait things out. A quick calculation indicates that she would have to have
been going roughly 236 mph to get to the other side with a 4" drop in
height, probably the maximum drop that would allow the car to survive. If
the car could survive hitting the other side 6" below the road surface, you
could make it at "only" 193 mph.

Don't believe the "science" in Hollywood.

--
Bob (Chief Pilot, White Knuckle Airways)


"cjcampbell" wrote in message
oups.com...


A lot of these guys think the real world works like Hollywood movies.
They expect to see an airplane silhouette in the wall of the Pentagon,
as if Wile E. Coyote had run through it. Next time someone tries to
justify Hollywood's continual refusal to recognize the laws of physics
by saying "It's only a movie" you might want to remember just how much
that idiocy influences these nutcases.



  #22  
Old May 17th 06, 11:01 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The new Pentagon video

I just don't think that the governement can keep that kind of secret.

Hell, the government can't get drug assistance for the elderly right -- yet
people believe that they can organize a conspiracy?

It's laughable.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


  #23  
Old May 17th 06, 11:59 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The new Pentagon video


Ol Shy & Bashful wrote:
Having been onsite for quite a number of airplane crashes, numerous
military aircraft, jets and piston, single and multi engine, the thing
that struck me was the lack of aircraft wreckage and the bodies of
occupants.
Curious that the hole was round and showed no evidence of the wings or
engines impacting the building. Large pieces of engines have been on
every crash site I ever photographed as part of an accident
investigation team.
I know the conspiracy buffs want to go someplace with it. I'd like to
know what in hell happened to all the aircraft parts and pieces? Even
the space shuittle left a lot of wreckage and bodies that were
identified from how big an explosion and how high?


Don't be stupid. The conspiracy web sites are very selective in the
pictures that they show. There are plenty of pictures of airplane parts
if you look for them.

The same for damaged grass.

The conspiracy buffs are also very good at taking reporters' comments
out of context.

As I said, most of these conspiracy buffs are a bunch of holocaust
deniers and other enemies of the United States. In a just world they
would be tried and hanged as the terrorists and traitors that they are.

  #24  
Old May 18th 06, 12:14 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The new Pentagon video

"Ol Shy & Bashful" wrote in
ups.com:

Dean
What is the difference in size and payload between the F4 and Flight 77?


You need to go back to high school and sit in on the physics
class on kinetic energy. This time, pay attention instead of
wanking off over the cheerleader sitting in front of you.

Damn. If I were rich, I would pay for a re-enactment of the
Pentagon and Twin Towers crashes into re-creations of both
structures using remote controlled aircraft. It would be
worth the millions of dollars just to hear all you conspiracy
whacks sit in silence with nary a retort.

Out government is screwed up enough as it is without a bunch
of idiots making **** up. If you put your energies into fixing
all the real problems instead of all the imaginary ones, this
Country would be much better off than it currently is.

Brian
--
http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?
  #25  
Old May 18th 06, 12:31 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The new Pentagon video

In article n3Nag.153382$oL.66718@attbi_s71,
"Jay Honeck" wrote:

I just don't think that the governement can keep that kind of secret.


Hell, the government can't get drug assistance for the elderly right -- yet
people believe that they can organize a conspiracy?


It's all part of the conspiracy... feigning incompetence to lull people into
thinking that there couldn't be a successful conspiracy.


:-)

--
Bob Noel
Looking for a sig the
lawyers will hate

  #26  
Old May 18th 06, 01:26 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The new Pentagon video


"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
news:n3Nag.153382$oL.66718@attbi_s71...
I just don't think that the governement can keep that kind of secret.


Hell, the government can't get drug assistance for the elderly right --
yet people believe that they can organize a conspiracy?

It's laughable.


They think they can "run" the economy, whereas in reality, they couldn't run
a lemonade stand.


  #27  
Old May 18th 06, 01:27 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The new Pentagon video


"Bob Noel" wrote in message
...
In article n3Nag.153382$oL.66718@attbi_s71,
"Jay Honeck" wrote:

I just don't think that the governement can keep that kind of secret.


Hell, the government can't get drug assistance for the elderly right --
yet
people believe that they can organize a conspiracy?


It's all part of the conspiracy... feigning incompetence to lull people
into
thinking that there couldn't be a successful conspiracy.



Feigning?


  #28  
Old May 18th 06, 01:30 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The new Pentagon video


"Skywise" wrote in message
...
"Ol Shy & Bashful" wrote in
ups.com:

Dean
What is the difference in size and payload between the F4 and Flight 77?


You need to go back to high school and sit in on the physics
class on kinetic energy. This time, pay attention instead of
wanking off over the cheerleader sitting in front of you.

Damn. If I were rich, I would pay for a re-enactment of the
Pentagon and Twin Towers crashes into re-creations of both
structures using remote controlled aircraft. It would be
worth the millions of dollars just to hear all you conspiracy
whacks sit in silence with nary a retort.


That wouldn't shut them up; they'd say it was part of the conspiracy.

"Ignorance is bliss!!"


  #29  
Old May 18th 06, 02:23 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The new Pentagon video

In article ,
"Matt Barrow" wrote:

It's all part of the conspiracy... feigning incompetence to lull people
into
thinking that there couldn't be a successful conspiracy.


Feigning?


see how good they are?

:-)

--
Bob Noel
Looking for a sig the
lawyers will hate

  #30  
Old May 18th 06, 06:00 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The new Pentagon video

cjcampbell wrote:

As I said, most of these conspiracy buffs are a bunch of holocaust deniers and other enemies of the United States. In a just world they would be tried and hanged as the terrorists and traitors that they are.



I differ with you somewhat here. The scenario you describe is
dangerously similar not to a just but an intolerant world. We should do
everything we can to preserve freedom of everything, speech included,
so stifling a dissenting voice is no solution. The best way to beat
such people down is with objective, irrefutable evidence although I
agree it'd involve the precious time of many.

Ramapriya

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder John Doe Piloting 145 March 31st 06 06:58 PM
HD Video Production [email protected] Piloting 0 February 21st 06 05:54 AM
MSFS 2004 Video frame rate very slow Greg Brown Simulators 1 November 11th 05 07:24 PM
Showstoppers (long, but interesting questions raised) Anonymous Spamless Military Aviation 0 April 21st 04 05:09 AM
Real World Specs for FS 2004 Paul H. Simulators 16 August 18th 03 09:25 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.