![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jerry Springer" wrote As of the 25th of May I will be using Just curious, but why do you post the real thing here, for spam bots to harvest? -- Jim in NC |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Morgans wrote:
"Jerry Springer" wrote As of the 25th of May I will be using Just curious, but why do you post the real thing here, for spam bots to harvest? Because I don't have a problem with spam. I can filter 99% of it out with the right software. Jerry |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Morgans wrote:
"Jerry Springer" wrote As of the 25th of May I will be using Just curious, but why do you post the real thing here, for spam bots to harvest? I have never been a paranoid computer user. I sure I have not been online as long as some here but I have not had a problem since the days of using my first suitcase size portable computer which was an old CPM Osborne. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
While it may be true that you don't have a problem with spam ("mostly")
just think of all the bandwidth the spammers clog up while sending you email (that you don't "see") and your email client bouncing it back. It slows down the whole internet for everybody. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
abripl wrote:
While it may be true that you don't have a problem with spam ("mostly") just think of all the bandwidth the spammers clog up while sending you email (that you don't "see") and your email client bouncing it back. It slows down the whole internet for everybody. Bull **** |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
abripl wrote:
While it may be true that you don't have a problem with spam ("mostly") just think of all the bandwidth the spammers clog up while sending you email (that you don't "see") and your email client bouncing it back. It slows down the whole internet for everybody. And you are so naive that you don't know that spammers are sending spam to your phony email address, then being bounced back? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jerry Springer wrote: abripl wrote: While it may be true that you don't have a problem with spam ("mostly") just think of all the bandwidth the spammers clog up while sending you email (that you don't "see") and your email client bouncing it back. It slows down the whole internet for everybody. Bull **** Take it easy... Why get so excited? Lets try to reason. Maybe you did not understand what I meant. To quote you: "I can filter 99% of it out with the right software.." Meaning that junk mail gets to your software and then it is rejected. Whether or not your software bounces it back - some email clients do - the spam generates bandwith. Taking the precaution to not publish your email in the first place prevents the bandwith abuse and helps all of us. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bull ****
...you are so naive... Why get excited? No insults were meant. Lets try to reason. To quote you: "I can filter 99% of it out with the right software.." Meaning that junk mail gets to your software and then it is rejected. Whether or not your software bounces it back (some email clients do) the spam generates bandwith. Taking the precaution to not publish your email in the first place prevents the bandwith abuse and helps all of us. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jerry Springer" wrote And you are so naive that you don't know that spammers are sending spam to your phony email address, then being bounced back? So if you put your address down as jerry at springer dot net, the spam bots are going to pick it up, and boounce it back? I seriously doubt it. -- Jim in NC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
email attack | Richard Lamb | Home Built | 21 | September 29th 03 06:39 AM |