A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Cessna developing new LSA



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old June 9th 06, 09:51 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Cessna developing new LSA

On 2006-06-09, Dave Stadt wrote:
Then why did Diamond dump Rotax in favor of Continental.


The Continental engine is much more powerful - 125hp IIRC. That little
85 hp engine was never enough for the Katana. The issue of a very
conservative US market which won't buy anything other than
Lyc/Continental probably didn't help, and as you point out the
lack of decent after sales service in the US just compounded the problem.

We'll probably see the same thing with Thierlert - they will do well in
Europe but despite burning half the fuel of a Lycontisaurus, probably
won't sell at all in the US.

Kept properly maintained (just like any other 4 stroke engine), the 4
stroke Rotaxes are reliable.

--
Yes, the Reply-To email address is valid.
Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de
  #32  
Old June 9th 06, 11:56 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Cessna developing new LSA

Dylan Smith wrote:

On 2006-06-09, Dave Stadt wrote:

Then why did Diamond dump Rotax in favor of Continental.



The Continental engine is much more powerful - 125hp IIRC. That little
85 hp engine was never enough for the Katana. The issue of a very
conservative US market which won't buy anything other than
Lyc/Continental probably didn't help, and as you point out the
lack of decent after sales service in the US just compounded the problem.


It isn't a "conservative US market", it is the lack of an overall better
product. The same was said about Japanese cars in the 70s. Nobody
would ever buy Japanese cars. Well, you don't hear that much now. They
got their act together and made a better product. There is certainly a
time lag as folks catch on to the product being better, but Rotax has
been around long enough to overcome that ... if only they had a better
product.


Matt
  #33  
Old June 9th 06, 02:02 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Cessna developing new LSA

Cool. But if you've flown the "CT", you know that the "modern 152" is
already on the market, brand new, for less than $90K.
http://www.flightdesignusa.com/


$92,900 for the base price does not sound like "less than $90K." :-)


They were selling for "only" $86K here in Iowa City...
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


  #34  
Old June 9th 06, 06:29 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Cessna developing new LSA

Actually, its sounds like they're going to have a scale model, not a
full size mockup. I could be wrong though.

  #35  
Old June 9th 06, 06:33 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Cessna developing new LSA

You must be thinking of 2 stroke rotax's. The 4 strokes are very
reliable. Lots of 2 strokes of different makes deadstick, mostly due to
old fuel.


  #36  
Old June 10th 06, 12:01 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Cessna developing new LSA


"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...
Dylan Smith wrote:

On 2006-06-09, Dave Stadt wrote:

Then why did Diamond dump Rotax in favor of Continental.



The Continental engine is much more powerful - 125hp IIRC. That little 85
hp engine was never enough for the Katana. The issue of a very
conservative US market which won't buy anything other than
Lyc/Continental probably didn't help, and as you point out the lack of
decent after sales service in the US just compounded the problem.


It isn't a "conservative US market", it is the lack of an overall better
product. The same was said about Japanese cars in the 70s. Nobody would
ever buy Japanese cars. Well, you don't hear that much now. They got
their act together and made a better product. There is certainly a time
lag as folks catch on to the product being better, but Rotax has been
around long enough to overcome that ... if only they had a better product.


And if they had anything approaching a support network.

Matt



  #37  
Old June 10th 06, 03:00 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Cessna developing new LSA


"John T" wrote in message
...
You must be thinking of 2 stroke rotax's. The 4 strokes are very reliable.
Lots of 2 strokes of different makes deadstick, mostly due to old fuel.


Yep, the two strokes are "very" unreliable. The 4 strokes are "just"
unreliable.

Do some looking around, out there in cyberspace. There are plenty of folks
that have had bad experiences with the 4 strokes.
--
Jim in NC


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1/72 Cessna 300, 400 series scale models Ale Owning 3 October 22nd 13 03:40 PM
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? Rick Umali Piloting 29 February 15th 06 04:40 AM
Nearly had my life terminated today Michelle P Piloting 11 September 3rd 05 02:37 AM
Wow - heard on the air... (long) Nathan Young Piloting 68 July 25th 05 06:51 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.