A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

How many pilots are using technology



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old July 27th 06, 11:19 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,232
Default How many pilots are using technology

Roger wrote:

I've always been an "Early Adopter" when I could afford it and my
degree and profession are in computer science. Having said that I use
a portable GPS and even fly IFR using it. I also have RNAV in the
panel. The rest of the stuff is "gadgets" to me. If I can bring the
charts up on the panel (moving map display and approach charts) that
is fine, but costs too much and I'd not abandon paper charts for VFR,
Enroute, or approach. The GPS makes flying much easier. Having the
approach charts on GPS is even finer, but again I'd never give up the
paper as its batteries never die although they do fly out the door
seal once in a while.


Your batteries fly out the door seal? You must have that new really,
really thin battery technology! :-)


Matt
  #32  
Old July 27th 06, 11:21 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,232
Default How many pilots are using technology

Chris W wrote:

Private wrote:

It is an old joke, but the answer is that; 'we will see the paper-less
cockpit (and office) the same day we have a paper-less bathroom.'

ISTM that computer usage has resulted in more paper and not less.



While it is true that computers have resulted in more, not less, paper
being used, a paper-less office is very possible (depending on the
business). One of the reasons computers initially generated more paper,
is because of the larger amount of data they could provide, and the fact
that few had the computers on their desk. Not to mention that the
monitors were small and very low resolution. Today a paper-less office
is not hard to achieve with a little effort. However, I wouldn't even
consider having a paper-less cockpit. I also wouldn't want a
computer-less cockpit either though.


True, but paper is still the most reliable form of long-term storage.
Every electronic or optical medium developed thus far deteriorates with
age at a much faster rate than does paper.


Matt
  #33  
Old July 27th 06, 02:20 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Gig 601XL Builder
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,317
Default How many pilots are using technology


"Newps" wrote in message
...


Icebound wrote:

"Newps" wrote in message
...

... A computer can display a page as nice as paper but it may take
longer to access the information.



No it cannot.


Yes it can.


http://www.arinc.com/news/2006/07-23-06.html


If that is using the technology I think it is it is really kind of neat. It
uses almost no battery power except when it redraws the page.


  #34  
Old July 27th 06, 03:15 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jose[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,632
Default How many pilots are using technology

Every electronic or optical medium developed thus far deteriorates with age at a much faster rate than does paper.

.... and the most important "aging" effects is from the software. I have
plenty of documents I can no longer read because the software is
incompatible with today's versions, and the old software is incompatible
with today's hardware, and the old hardware no longer works.

Jose
--
The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #35  
Old July 27th 06, 04:30 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Andrew Gideon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 516
Default How many pilots are using technology

On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 08:20:52 -0500, Gig 601XL Builder wrote:

If that is using the technology I think it is it is really kind of neat.
It uses almost no battery power except when it redraws the page.


One of the stated advantages is:

Based on new “persistent display” technology, the screen requires
very little power and no backlighting. The display can run during long
hours of flight over several days on a single charge.

That's pretty impressive. At least during an approach (ie. no chart
changing), one isn't likely to lose the plate due to a power failure.

I also liked:

The “electronic paper” screen also captures and stores handwritten
notes from pilots using the stylus.

which is another common difference between paper and computer displays.

- Andrew

  #36  
Old July 27th 06, 05:00 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Dylan Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 530
Default How many pilots are using technology

On 2006-07-27, Jose wrote:
Every electronic or optical medium developed thus far deteriorates with age at a much faster rate than does paper.


... and the most important "aging" effects is from the software. I have
plenty of documents I can no longer read because the software is
incompatible with today's versions, and the old software is incompatible
with today's hardware, and the old hardware no longer works.


If the documents are underneat not encrypted, and not in any weird
character set, it is possible to recover them without too much
difficulty (although the formatting will be gone).

I suspect non-proprietary formats though (such as jpg or png for images)
will have a much longer shelf life than proprietary document formats.

--
Yes, the Reply-To email address is valid.
Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de
  #37  
Old July 27th 06, 05:47 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jose[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,632
Default How many pilots are using technology

If the documents are underneat not encrypted, and not in any weird
character set, it is possible to recover them without too much
difficulty (although the formatting will be gone).


Yes, I've managed to extract the text of the ones I need, however, there
are text fragments scattered throughout, which may be updates ("quick
saves"), to the solid text parts, which would be older versions.

Jose
--
The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #38  
Old July 28th 06, 03:03 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Roger[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 677
Default How many pilots are using technology

On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:19:44 GMT, Matt Whiting
wrote:

Roger wrote:

I've always been an "Early Adopter" when I could afford it and my
degree and profession are in computer science. Having said that I use
a portable GPS and even fly IFR using it. I also have RNAV in the
panel. The rest of the stuff is "gadgets" to me. If I can bring the
charts up on the panel (moving map display and approach charts) that
is fine, but costs too much and I'd not abandon paper charts for VFR,
Enroute, or approach. The GPS makes flying much easier. Having the
approach charts on GPS is even finer, but again I'd never give up the
paper as its batteries never die although they do fly out the door
seal once in a while.


Your batteries fly out the door seal? You must have that new really,
really thin battery technology! :-)


Yah ever take a look at the gap under a Cherokee 180's door without
the rubber seal?:-))

But yes, the batteries in the paper charts are really thin and never
go dead. Unfortunately they don't handle water well.

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com


Matt

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com
  #39  
Old July 28th 06, 04:58 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
John Galban
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 64
Default How many pilots are using technology


Roger wrote:

Yah ever take a look at the gap under a Cherokee 180's door without
the rubber seal?:-))

It can happen with a door seal too. The door hardware gets old and
bent and the gaps can be there even with a seal. I'm planning on
redoing my hardware and rehanging the door because I found a gap at the
bottom of the door that I didn't know was there.

I was on the first test flight with my new engine and my IA handed me
the break-in instructions just before takeoff for a 45 min. orbit over
the field. Once I got to altitude, I grabbed the sheet and laid it on
the passenger seat for reference. 2 seconds later, right before my
eyes, the sheet vanished without a sound. Apparently, I had a gap on
the bottom side of the door. Fortunately, I'd already memorized the
instructions.

I was just hoping that the sheet didn't float down and land in front
of my IA. He might have taken it personally :-))

John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180)
Flying site : http://www.johngalban.com/

  #40  
Old July 28th 06, 10:09 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Roger[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 677
Default How many pilots are using technology

On 27 Jul 2006 20:58:17 -0700, "John Galban"
wrote:


Roger wrote:

Yah ever take a look at the gap under a Cherokee 180's door without
the rubber seal?:-))

It can happen with a door seal too. The door hardware gets old and


Many years ago I was on a cross country in a Cherokee 180 about 100
miles from home. I had just checked the ATIS frequency on the chart,
laid the chart on the passenger seat and was setting in the frequency.
I saw movement, I grabbed, heard a loud snap and found I was still
holding the corner (bout a 6" piece) of what had been a new chart.
That whole opened chart shot out under that door like a flash.

It's almost impossible to get lost in Lower Michigan due to the
geography unless you are flying really low, but there are gunnery and
bombing ranges it'd be a good idea to avoid.:-)) Living here, I know
where they are.

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com
bent and the gaps can be there even with a seal. I'm planning on
redoing my hardware and rehanging the door because I found a gap at the
bottom of the door that I didn't know was there.

I was on the first test flight with my new engine and my IA handed me
the break-in instructions just before takeoff for a 45 min. orbit over
the field. Once I got to altitude, I grabbed the sheet and laid it on
the passenger seat for reference. 2 seconds later, right before my
eyes, the sheet vanished without a sound. Apparently, I had a gap on
the bottom side of the door. Fortunately, I'd already memorized the
instructions.

I was just hoping that the sheet didn't float down and land in front
of my IA. He might have taken it personally :-))

John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180)
Flying site : http://www.johngalban.com/

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Bob Barbanes repost 5: " Neophyte questions " [email protected] Rotorcraft 0 February 26th 06 03:01 AM
Here we go again Roger Piloting 39 April 7th 05 07:20 AM
FAA Mandatory Pilot Retirement Rule Challenged Larry Dighera Piloting 0 March 20th 05 08:56 PM
Disruptive Technology Steelgtr62 Home Built 13 October 24th 04 07:32 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.