![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul Tomblin" wrote in message ... In a previous article, john smith said: Here are a few suggestions for the future Garmin GPS-596... - flat panel package, one-inch thick (max, including battery) - replaceable Li-ion battery pack; optional AA battery pack - a five-inch diagonal screen (as on the 530) - landscape or portrait viewing select - XM weather and radio - higher resolution - faster processor - ability to download text (NOTAM's, weather) - geo-referenced approach plates Now this is getting exciting! ![]() Jim |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Paul Tomblin wrote: - geo-referenced approach plates I think the "electronic ink" technology I saw at Oshkosh will be the solution for that problem. Much better than an active display, and likely the be driven down in price by consumer volumes. I'm not sure the tech is quite there yet, but it's not far off... http://www.eflybook.com/ |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
(Paul Tomblin) wrote: - geo-referenced approach plates I don't understand this one. Paul, please explain. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It means that with GPS input, the little airplane flys over the approach
plate that is displayed on the unit and it's actually in the correct location. My FlightPrep/ChartCase program will do it on a notebook/laptop, but it's windoze/hard drive based instead of solid state. Pretty cool and dead on accurate when it works. Jim "john smith" wrote in message ... In article , (Paul Tomblin) wrote: - geo-referenced approach plates I don't understand this one. Paul, please explain. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The reality is that--while not perfect--the 396/496 are pretty darn good
already. Screen size would seem to be the most obvious improvement. I've flown around 5 hours with the unit since OSH, and am extremely happy with it. Every feature you could want (and a few I hadn't considered) are there -- except for the screen size and the landscape-only display. Today I used it in "automotive" mode for the first time, and found it to be absolutely the coolest thing I've seen. I selected my airport (while sitting in the driveway at my home), and it gave me turn-by-turn VERBAL instructions, complete with warnings 0.1 miles ahead of each turn, right to the terminal building. Very slick and easy. I now know why they use the dinky little screen on the 496 -- anything bigger won't fit on the dashboard of most cars. Garmin is trying to make the unit do double (or, with marine, triple) duty, to the detriment of the aviation mode. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com,
"Mike Granby" wrote: Paul Tomblin wrote: - geo-referenced approach plates I think the "electronic ink" technology I saw at Oshkosh will be the solution for that problem. Much better than an active display, and likely the be driven down in price by consumer volumes. I'm not sure the tech is quite there yet, but it's not far off... I don't know, it's really, really nice to have geo-reference plates with your aircraft position plotted as you fly the approach. I had this capability with PocketPlates (an AWM product), unfortunately, the product wasn't stable enough to be usable... but the concept was impressive. JKG |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . com,
"Jay Honeck" wrote: I now know why they use the dinky little screen on the 496 -- anything bigger won't fit on the dashboard of most cars. Garmin is trying to make the unit do double (or, with marine, triple) duty, to the detriment of the aviation mode. I thought about that regarding the size. It is nice to be able to use the unit in the car, where I appreciate the weather information just the same. I get more use out of my investment (in both the GPS and XM) by using it in the car in addition to the airplane. I would think that the screen could still grow vertically and be usable on all but the smallest of car dash boards. I don't know, I guess we'll have to see how the product evolves. Even with the smaller screen, there are plenty of ways that Garmin could enhanced the product. JKG |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Tomblin wrote:
In a previous article, john smith said: Here are a few suggestions for the future Garmin GPS-596... - flat panel package, one-inch thick (max, including battery) - replaceable Li-ion battery pack; optional AA battery pack - a five-inch diagonal screen (as on the 530) - landscape or portrait viewing select - XM weather and radio - higher resolution - faster processor - ability to download text (NOTAM's, weather) - geo-referenced approach plates -- The Garmin 430/530 already displays your position with respect to the approach course, so I am not sure if georeferencing an actual approach chart would be worth the extra trouble. What would be useful is to show the stepdown altitude for each segment. Obviously this information is available in the database, but I don't know why they chose not to display it. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote I now know why they use the dinky little screen on the 496 -- anything bigger won't fit on the dashboard of most cars. Garmin is trying to make the unit do double (or, with marine, triple) duty, to the detriment of the aviation mode. I wonder if Garmin will come out with a new software, or if someone will make a hack - to make it work in portrait mode, for aviation. -- Jim in NC |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Jim Burns" wrote: It means that with GPS input, the little airplane flys over the approach plate that is displayed on the unit and it's actually in the correct location. My FlightPrep/ChartCase program will do it on a notebook/laptop, but it's windoze/hard drive based instead of solid state. Pretty cool and dead on accurate when it works. Now I understand. I have flown approaches with an MX-20, but having the approach plate overlayed would be a definite advantage. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Garmin GpsMap 396 - Flight Test #2 | Mike Spera | Owning | 17 | July 9th 06 01:21 PM |
Amateur Review of the Garmin GPSMAP 296 GPS | Rhett | Piloting | 10 | March 23rd 05 01:16 AM |
Pirep: Garmin GPSMAP 296 versus 295. (very long) | Jon Woellhaf | Piloting | 12 | September 4th 04 11:55 PM |
Amateur Review of the Garmin GPSMAP 296 GPS | Rhett | Products | 10 | April 29th 04 06:57 AM |
Garmin 90 Database Updates Discontinued | Val Christian | Piloting | 14 | August 20th 03 09:32 PM |