A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

$640.00 to fill the tanks...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #271  
Old August 28th 06, 03:43 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,232
Default "It works well enough" (was $640.00 to fill the tanks...)

Jose wrote:

Yes, C is great for those who don't much care about the quality of
their software, which, unfortunately, is the preponderance of
programmers.



C is great for those who care a lot about the quality of their own work,
and therefore don't rely on the language to catch them.


Wow, I've never heard that excuse before ... not. Any skilled
tradesperson or professional will use better tools when they are
available. Programmers are one of the few professions that don't. I
honestly have tried to figure this out, as have many others, but I'm
still stumped.

Matt
  #272  
Old August 28th 06, 03:45 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jose[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,632
Default "It works well enough" (was $640.00 to fill the tanks...)

Any skilled tradesperson or professional will use better tools when they are available. Programmers are one of the few professions that don't.

Maybe it's because programmers think they know what they're doing, and
like the flexibility of a language that lets them discover the lie
themselves.

Jose
--
The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #273  
Old August 28th 06, 03:57 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,232
Default "It works well enough" (was $640.00 to fill the tanks...)

Jose wrote:
Any skilled tradesperson or professional will use better tools when
they are available. Programmers are one of the few professions that
don't.



Maybe it's because programmers think they know what they're doing, and
like the flexibility of a language that lets them discover the lie
themselves.


That's as good a theory as any I've heard. I'm constantly amazed when I
hear (still!) about security breaches and other errors caused by
overruning of array boundaries and similar errors that were eliminated
20+ years ago in many languages yet which soldier on in C. Yes, I'm
aware of tools like Lint and such made to combat this, but many folks
still don't use such tools.


Matt
  #274  
Old August 28th 06, 04:26 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Gig 601XL Builder
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,317
Default "It works well enough" (was $640.00 to fill the tanks...)


"Jose" wrote in message
et...
And something better would be? would have been?


C is better than FORTRAN. Maybe something like C would have been
developed sooner if FORTRAN compilers didn't get so good.

Anything is better than HTML. Of course "better" depends on the use to
which it is put, and HTML is not really being put to the uses it was
intended for. Not being an expert in the internet, I don't have much to
offer as an improvement, but I know a kludge when I see it.

Jose


I'm not an internet expert either but everybody knows that the downfall of
HTML was the creation of the [Flash] tag.


  #275  
Old August 28th 06, 05:58 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Paul Tomblin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 690
Default "It works well enough" (was $640.00 to fill the tanks...)

In a previous article, Matt Whiting said:
Jose wrote:
C is great for those who care a lot about the quality of their own work,
and therefore don't rely on the language to catch them.


Wow, I've never heard that excuse before ... not. Any skilled
tradesperson or professional will use better tools when they are
available. Programmers are one of the few professions that don't. I
honestly have tried to figure this out, as have many others, but I'm
still stumped.


You know who else are stumped? Carpenters who wanted to catch their own
mistakes rather than having safety guards on their saws.


--
Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/
"Every computer crashes, because every OS sucks"
- Three Dead Trolls In A Baggie, "Every OS Sucks" http://www.deadtroll.com/
  #276  
Old August 28th 06, 06:11 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Roy Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 478
Default "It works well enough" (was $640.00 to fill the tanks...)

Matt Whiting wrote:
Jose wrote:

Yes, C is great for those who don't much care about the quality of
their software, which, unfortunately, is the preponderance of
programmers.



C is great for those who care a lot about the quality of their own work,
and therefore don't rely on the language to catch them.


Wow, I've never heard that excuse before ... not. Any skilled
tradesperson or professional will use better tools when they are
available. Programmers are one of the few professions that don't. I
honestly have tried to figure this out, as have many others, but I'm
still stumped.


C/C++ is the NDB of the programming world.
  #277  
Old August 28th 06, 07:27 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Grumman-581[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 491
Default "It works well enough" (was $640.00 to fill the tanks...)

On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 06:24:19 -0400, Bob Noel
wrote:
yeah - C is a wonderful programming language for critical software.

not.


Well, it requires the developer to be competent... I don't necessarily
think that this is a *bad* thing... There is too many
fill-in-the-blank 'programmers' out there today... They can draw the
pretty little user interfaces and fill in the code behind the
callbacks from the buttons and such, but they're not *real*
programmers...
  #278  
Old August 28th 06, 07:56 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Grumman-581[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 491
Default "It works well enough" (was $640.00 to fill the tanks...)

On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 07:34:35 -0700, "Matt Barrow"
wrote:
Real Programmers...

snip

Yep, that one has been around for a *long* time in various flavors...

http://grumman581.googlepages.com/real-programmers

Of course, it's true...
  #279  
Old August 28th 06, 07:57 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Grumman-581[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 491
Default "It works well enough" (was $640.00 to fill the tanks...)

On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 14:38:56 GMT, Jose
wrote:
C is great for those who care a lot about the quality of their own work,
and therefore don't rely on the language to catch them.


Correct... 'C' is all about personal responsibility... A trait sadly
lacking in many people these days...
  #280  
Old August 28th 06, 08:01 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Grumman-581[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 491
Default "It works well enough" (was $640.00 to fill the tanks...)

On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 10:26:58 -0500, "Gig 601XL Builder"
wrDOTgiaconaATcox.net wrote:
I'm not an internet expert either but everybody knows that the downfall of
HTML was the creation of the [Flash] tag.


The Navy does not allow Flash on any of the machines on their networks
due to security concerns... I don't allow it on any of my machines
either... If a company has a site that requires flash, I send them an
email voicing my concerns and thanking them for the priviledge of
being allowed to do business with their non-Flash enabled
competitors...
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Flt. 800 Anniversay: Exploding Fuel Tanks STILL In Airline Planes!!! Free Speaker General Aviation 3 July 24th 06 06:06 PM
Exposed Electrical Wires in Boeing 737 Fuel Tanks! Larry Dighera Piloting 0 July 17th 06 06:13 PM
Fuel Tanks C172 [email protected] Owning 1 May 2nd 06 05:45 AM
F-104 in Viet Nam Question Don Harstad Military Aviation 2 August 28th 04 08:40 AM
Long-range Spitfires and daylight Bomber Command raids (was: #1 Jet of World War II) The Revolution Will Not Be Televised Military Aviation 20 August 27th 03 09:14 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.