![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:25:35 -0500, Ross Richardson
wrote: Be sure you set the DG to the magnetic compass before you turn onto the runway and not do like some pilots I have seen. Line up on the runway and set the compass. Hmmm... Your compass must be a different model than mine... I don't think that there is any mechanism to readily adjust mine prior to takeoff... |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Traffic count" is a euphemism for not paying attention.
Peter Duniho wrote: "Newps" wrote in message ... Nope. One guy in the tower. The FAA has already admitted that they broke their own rules by having only one controller staffed when the policy requires a minimum of two at all times, at all facilities. They will probably hang the tower manager as a scapegoat. Yeah, I saw that. It wasn't clear to me the policy violation had anything to do with the accident though. As the news explained it, the policy was to have a radar controller in addition to the tower controller. They also say that the tower controller was distracted doing a "traffic count". AFAIK, having a radar controller on duty wouldn't have affected that. Or is a traffic count something that the radar controller would have done? Pete |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Grumman-581 wrote: On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 20:56:10 -0600, Newps wrote: Nope. One guy in the tower. The FAA has already admitted that they broke their own rules by having only one controller staffed when the policy requires a minimum of two at all times, at all facilities. They will probably hang the tower manager as a scapegoat. Nawh, it'll be the PIC as always... Maybe a couple of other contributing factors, but in the end, the PIC will take the hit... As far as the FAA is concerned, it all boils down to something like, "Well, you didn't *have* to fly that day"... sick-grin Yes the FAA will come down on the crew. The lawyers will drag the FAA into court however. |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Newps wrote:
"Traffic count" is a euphemism for not paying attention. Traffic count at 6 AM on Sunday? yea right. Ron Lee Peter Duniho wrote: "Newps" wrote in message ... Nope. One guy in the tower. The FAA has already admitted that they broke their own rules by having only one controller staffed when the policy requires a minimum of two at all times, at all facilities. They will probably hang the tower manager as a scapegoat. Yeah, I saw that. It wasn't clear to me the policy violation had anything to do with the accident though. As the news explained it, the policy was to have a radar controller in addition to the tower controller. They also say that the tower controller was distracted doing a "traffic count". AFAIK, having a radar controller on duty wouldn't have affected that. Or is a traffic count something that the radar controller would have done? Pete |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Guy Elden Jr" wrote in message oups.com... This is just one of those "little extras" that every pilot should include in that last second look around the pit before opening the throttle. With me; I always made it a point to hestiate for a few seconds for a line up re-check. Yep... lights, camera, action, where the action - check dg / line it up with runway numbers. Before now, I'll admit, all I did was reset the dg to the runway heading, but from now on, I'll be paying much closer attention to the variance. Too much means something ain't right. -- Guy From Lr24 training. Remember: Aim, then Fire... Al G |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ron Lee wrote: Newps wrote: "Traffic count" is a euphemism for not paying attention. Traffic count at 6 AM on Sunday? yea right. Traffic is normally counted at the top of every hour, for those facilities where it is not automated, and entered into the computer. Between 12 and 2 am the days traffic count has to be entered into a separate program and then sent to Wahington. |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Newps wrote: "Traffic count" is a euphemism for not paying attention. as is "I was on the landline" -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Aluckyguess" wrote in message ... :I took a freind up today and he asked how something like that can happen. My : answer was simple, their human. : they're human... |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ron Lee" wrote in message ... Traffic count at 6 AM on Sunday? yea right. Disbelief? Traffic is counted at hourly intervals. The accident occurred just after the hour. |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob Noel" wrote in message ... as is "I was on the landline" It can be. But landline calls are made, and traffic is counted. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VQ-1's P4M-1Q crash off China - 1956 | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | May 6th 06 11:13 PM |
Pilot claims no blame in July crash | Mortimer Schnerd, RN | Piloting | 48 | March 15th 06 09:00 PM |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
Doubts raised in jet crash | Dave Butler | Piloting | 8 | July 26th 05 01:25 AM |
Yet another A36 crash | H.P. | Piloting | 10 | April 23rd 05 05:58 PM |