A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Warning: 25' wide, 1800' long



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old November 7th 06, 09:19 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mortimer Schnerd, RN[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 597
Default Warning: 25' wide, 1800' long

Morgans wrote:
I'm not that familiar with the BE-18 but that does sound impressive.


A good old airplane. There are still a lot of them flying. It was also used
as a bomber trainer.

The British called it the Hudson, I believe.



And our air force called it the C-45. My dad used to carry around cadets in one
for orientation flights back when he was teaching ROTC back in the late 1950s.



--
Mortimer Schnerd, RN
mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com


  #32  
Old November 7th 06, 10:10 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Orval Fairbairn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 824
Default Warning: 25' wide, 1800' long

In article ,
"Morgans" wrote:

"Kingfish" wrote in message
ups.com...

Ross Richardson wrote:

I learned to fly out of a 1800' runway south of Kansas City, MO. The
name was Hillside. Never had problems with short runways. They even had
a Beech 18 going in and out.


I'm not that familiar with the BE-18 but that does sound impressive.


A good old airplane. There are still a lot of them flying. It was also used
as
a bomber trainer.

The British called it the Hudson, I believe.


Nope -- the Hudson was the bomber version of the Lockheed Model 14
Lodestar (a much bigger plane).
  #33  
Old November 8th 06, 04:39 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Grumman-581[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 262
Default Warning: 25' wide, 1800' long

"Grumman-581" wrote in message
...
I've gone into 2X53 with my Grumman and
the 1900 ft of paved runway was just barely
enough for that attempt...


Correction -- 2XS3, not 2X53... Hmmm... I think they changed the identifier
on the airport to T51 these days... The most recent sectional that I had
here at the house was from 1998...


  #34  
Old November 8th 06, 03:32 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Kingfish
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 470
Default Warning: 25' wide, 1800' long


Mortimer Schnerd, RN wrote:
Morgans wrote:
I'm not that familiar with the BE-18 but that does sound impressive.


A good old airplane. There are still a lot of them flying. It was also used
as a bomber trainer.

The British called it the Hudson, I believe.



And our air force called it the C-45. My dad used to carry around cadets in one
for orientation flights back when he was teaching ROTC back in the late 1950s.


Like Orval said, the Hudson was the RAF version of the larger Lockheed
Lodestar. Besides the C-45 Expeditor, the USAAF flew the glass-nosed
AT-11 variant of the Beech 18 for multi engine and bombardier training

  #35  
Old November 9th 06, 03:11 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Morgans[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,924
Default Warning: 25' wide, 1800' long


"Mortimer Schnerd, RN" mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com wrote

And our air force called it the C-45. My dad used to carry around cadets in
one for orientation flights back when he was teaching ROTC back in the late
1950s.


The first small plane crash scene I ever saw was a Beech 18. I was a kid, and
don't remember all the details. It went down heading into Toledo Express
Airport. (that was what it was called at the time)

It was a freight dog, clipped some tree tops, and went down. It had not been
hauled off yet, and was taped off, but I was impressed at the force of the
destruction. The crash was just a few miles from my house, and I rode over to
look at it on my bicycle, I think. Sad, terrible accident.

I just tried to look it up, but got no results. I guess I'm not smart enough to
make the database search work. :-()
--
Jim in NC

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Flying our Cardinal south for its new plumage - Long report Longworth Owning 19 October 20th 05 12:23 AM
Ultralight Club Bylaws - Warning Long Post MrHabilis Home Built 0 June 11th 04 05:07 PM
Flight test update - long nauga Home Built 1 June 5th 04 03:09 AM
SWRFI Pirep.. (long) Dave S Home Built 20 May 21st 04 03:02 PM
IFR Long X/C and the Specter of Expectations David B. Cole Instrument Flight Rules 0 February 24th 04 07:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.