![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Jack.
Is there anything in particular that I should look at on the D that may be a problem during inspection? Jeff At 02:12 13 November 2006, Jack wrote: If you're considering a D-model PIK, the flaps are not such an obstacle. It has flaps and spoilers. My B-model, has flaps only, and some people are put off by that. All I can say is that I'm 5'10' and 225 lbs. I am a little tight in the shoulders in my PIK, but not uncomfortable. I believe the PIKs will end up being among the most durable sailplanes ever produced. I also believe you'll be happeir with the PIKs performance. Just my opinion... Jack Womack PIK-20B N77MA (TE) |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jeff Runciman wrote: I have not written off any gliders yet. I have been looking since 2005. I have not been able to find an ASW 19 and the 101 has not been imported into Canada yet. I would love to get a 101 as I have heard it is a flapless ASW 20 but would be hard to bring into Canada. It is also almost impossible to bring in an experimental aircraft into Canada. You are right regarding the 101 if it is not certified/approved in Canada In other words you would have to do the leg work to get it approved. Importing an experimental and if this type is flying and certified in Canada then it is just a question of getting the paper work in order. It may cost you an extra $500.00. Been there done that. Even a registered home built can be imported into Canada. Udo |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On any PIK, or any sailplane for that matter, look at the ADs and the
log book. My PIK-20B has several ADs that can be periodically inspected, or fixed permanently. All of mine had the permanent fix so I don't have to fool with them. I do still look... I may be crazy, but I ain't stupid! Best of luck with it. Jack |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Do you know what paperwork is required?
Jeff At 04:00 13 November 2006, Udo wrote: Jeff Runciman wrote: I have not written off any gliders yet. I have been looking since 2005. I have not been able to find an ASW 19 and the 101 has not been imported into Canada yet. I would love to get a 101 as I have heard it is a flapless ASW 20 but would be hard to bring into Canada. It is also almost impossible to bring in an experimental aircraft into Canada. You are right regarding the 101 if it is not certified/approved in Canada In other words you would have to do the leg work to get it approved. Importing an experimental and if this type is flying and certified in Canada then it is just a question of getting the paper work in order. It may cost you an extra $500.00. Been there done that. Even a registered home built can be imported into Canada. Udo |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jeff
The Pik20d is a really nice glider to fly. It is a little tight across the seatpan so if you have wide hips you may have a problem. Good for tall pilots as lots of leg adjustment. It has one advantage you omitted to mention , that is it is not finished in glass so does not suffer the cracking/crazing that glass does so does not require re finishing every few years.... If inspecting ensure that the mod to the lower rudder hinge bracket has been carried out ( they tend to crack where the bend was too tight & an AD requires them to be welded to strengthen them) and also the u/c frame has a tendency to crack..(see Jim Tsillas site for more info) The 20d is a very strong glider but performance drops off once the wings are wet. As I have never flown a Jantar I can not compare them but I do like the Pik and I am sure you will also if you buy one. Mike Crawley |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Check this:
http://asw19.bravehost.com/ Craig Jeff Runciman wrote: I have not been able to find an ASW 19. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actually, don't check it!
When Turf closed, I decided to sell it, but it has so much crazing that no one was really interrested in it. So I decided to fly it after all, and just put 90 hrs in it the last 6 months! Still fly nice, and it's now paid for... So don't waste your time calling me, I am keeping it!...:-) Richard ASW19 Phoenix AZ wrote: Check this: http://asw19.bravehost.com/ |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Some PIK-20D's have problems with the paint (very thick in places)
coming off: Big blisters form, then crack and come off. The repair manual says you should make a hole in the blister, inject glue and press the paint on again. My club had his PIK (very bad paint problems around the canopy cut-out and on the wing trailing edge) professionaly repaired and resprayed once, and the guy said he would never take on another job like that. But many PIK have flawless paints, so you should check that in person before buying. It is a very nice glider to fly, very responsive to the ailerons, except in the full positive flap position. You have to ballast it when you want to fly over 100 mph, the wing - carbon fibre spar - is rock hard and gives a very turbulent ride if you don't. Ergonomy is excellent, everything is exactly where you want it to be (in that respect, it is much better than the ASW-20). But I wouldn't advise a beginner to fly one: you need to move the flaps during start and landing. The Jantar is a very nice glider too, if you've got the right proportions to be able to actuate the wheel and airbrake levers (my arms are too long). The original gelcoat is not very good (too thin and not really smooth), but can of course be improved by respraying, and the view is restricted by the canopy frame (2 parts). The canopy, once opened, is very sensible to wind (it opens to the rear and stays vertical, retained by a weak spring system). You have to choose between no ballast and full ballast (150 liters) for take off (you can unballast partially once in the air). It's not as good as some other gliders in very weak conditions, but it is a very fast club glider, even unballasted, in good to very good weather. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All gliders have at least one or two negative points it seems. If you
strike off a glider because of a negative or two, your gonna wind up with nothing. Shopping for and finding one in good condition is the challange I guess. Pros vs the Cons. Of course if you can spend more, a few more options come into the light and the model year may be more recent. Personally, I might be able to go up to about $30,000 when I am ready to buy. (Keeping fingers crossed) So close to an LS-4 or early Discus? Then there is the partnership idea. That looks more attractive all the time if one could find the right person. I would be very interested to hear what the good to bad ratio is in partnerships. Craig Some PIK-20D's have problems with the paint (very thick in places) coming off: Big blisters form, then crack and come off. The repair manual says you should make a hole in the blister, inject glue and press the paint on again. My club had his PIK (very bad paint problems around the canopy cut-out and on the wing trailing edge) professionaly repaired and resprayed once, and the guy said he would never take on another job like that. But many PIK have flawless paints, so you should check that in person before buying. It is a very nice glider to fly, very responsive to the ailerons, except in the full positive flap position. You have to ballast it when you want to fly over 100 mph, the wing - carbon fibre spar - is rock hard and gives a very turbulent ride if you don't. Ergonomy is excellent, everything is exactly where you want it to be (in that respect, it is much better than the ASW-20). But I wouldn't advise a beginner to fly one: you need to move the flaps during start and landing. The Jantar is a very nice glider too, if you've got the right proportions to be able to actuate the wheel and airbrake levers (my arms are too long). The original gelcoat is not very good (too thin and not really smooth), but can of course be improved by respraying, and the view is restricted by the canopy frame (2 parts). The canopy, once opened, is very sensible to wind (it opens to the rear and stays vertical, retained by a weak spring system). You have to choose between no ballast and full ballast (150 liters) for take off (you can unballast partially once in the air). It's not as good as some other gliders in very weak conditions, but it is a very fast club glider, even unballasted, in good to very good weather. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Craig,
I am a bit limited on the types of ships due to Transport Canada regulations on import. I am going to look at the PIK20D this weekend. If anyone has any more comments about the PIK like what to inspect on this glider let me know. I have the AD's and will be checking the log books. Jeff |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Jantar Std. 3 | [email protected] | Soaring | 2 | March 31st 05 10:50 PM |
Jantar 2b at the Cinema :) | Janusz Kesik | Soaring | 2 | February 23rd 05 04:33 AM |
Two-place Jantar?? | Gary Boggs | Soaring | 7 | August 22nd 04 07:14 PM |
Jantar Std 3 wanted | eR | Soaring | 1 | May 18th 04 05:32 PM |
Jantar 2A opinions sought | Mark Navarre | Soaring | 4 | November 18th 03 04:33 PM |