Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers

N2310D wrote:
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
....

I'm curious, do you have brown eyes?

In truth, no. But he's just a quart low.

F--

In article OOlch.1815$QC.115@trnddc02, "N2310D" wrote:

Horsefeathers!!! You are such an idiot. I can descend by pushing the yoke
forward or pulling it back.


Push the stick forward, the houses get bigger.

Pull the stick back, the houses get smaller.

Keep pulling the stick back, the houses get bigger.

--
Bob Noel
Looking for a sig the
lawyers will hate

In article , Greg Farris
wrote:

THIS GUY IS INSANITY IN DISTILLED FORM - 110 PROOF!!!!!!!!!!!!

His MO is malapropisms (not just aviation related).

Usenet's equivalent to Bill Crosby.

--
Bob Noel
Looking for a sig the
lawyers will hate

N2310D writes:

Horsefeathers!!! You are such an idiot. I can descend by pushing the yoke
forward or pulling it back.

So when it's time to land, you just push the yoke forward until you
touchdown on the runway?

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

Greg Farris writes:

"You see . . ."
No - I'm afraid I don't "see"?

Well, this is an aviation forum, so I'll just leave it at that.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

"Kingfish" wrote in message
Effective, yes, but very complex, heavy and expensive. I recall seeing
an ad for Breitling watches that had a P-51 with contra-rotating props.
I think it was a one-off aircraft with a RR Griffon engine?

That aircraft was modified for Unlimited racing at Reno. It also had the
bobbed canopy and clipped wings.

D.

110 proof is, after all, only 55% pure, and I give him higher scores
than that!


On Dec 3, 1:17 am, Greg Farris wrote:
In article ,
says...



No. If the bicycle cannot turn, it will fall over. It cannot turn on
rollers. It can turn on flat pavement.

You see, the bicycle stays up because it turns. "You see . . ."
No - I'm afraid I don't "see"?
Ten minuites ago, the bicycle satyed upright due to "power" to the rear wheel,
and "traction" on both wheels. Now, the bicycle stays upright because it
"turns". . .

In your most recent posts, the bicycle "cannot" fall unless it stops or loses
"traction". Now, the bicycle "stays upright because it turns" . . .

THIS GUY IS INSANITY IN DISTILLED FORM - 110 PROOF!!!!!!!!!!!!

Bob Noel wrote:



Usenet's equivalent to Bill Crosby.

Bing's brother?

Mxsmanic wrote:

N2310D writes:


Horsefeathers!!! You are such an idiot. I can descend by pushing the yoke
forward or pulling it back.


So when it's time to land, you just push the yoke forward until you
touchdown on the runway?



You could do it that way.

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
N2310D writes:

Horsefeathers!!! You are such an idiot. I can descend by pushing the
yoke
forward or pulling it back.

So when it's time to land, you just push the yoke forward until you
touchdown on the runway?

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

As a matter of fact for some landings I do exactly that.