![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Larry Dighera" wrote In a nod to the globalized economy, Boeing is taking a novel step for the company and allowing outside contractors -- many of them overseas -- to design and build 70 percent of the Dreamliner. The wings will come from Japan. Huge parts of the aircraft's body will arrive from Italy. Britain will deliver engines, and China will contribute rudders. France is producing the landing gear... It is fitting, that France is building the landing gear. Seems like their latest project can't quite get off the ground.... ;-) -- Jim in NC |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Airbus sank themselves, the market for planes of that superjumbo size
was small to begin with (they were saying something like 800 aircraft over a 20 year period). Used 743s and 744s out there are capable of filling most of the market for large aircraft (they will "trickle down" to "smaller airlines", like Kalitta Air or regional operaters, notably throughout SE Asia that will have a need for aircraft of that size in teh future), the A380 was targeted exclusivley at large airlines that could afford that initial $300M investment, because Boeing came along with the 772LR, 748, 787 and 777F they are able to offer (albeit smaller) four aircraft that can be tailored to a particular airlines desires, all of which fly on equal or superior technology to the Airbus and all of which come from a company that has consistently delivered on time, one of the major things killing Airbus right now. Also if you look at the A350, it's essentially a 777 with GEnx engines, except it's coming in a mere 18 years after the 777 did) Then if you look at the other reality that Boeing right now (with the 787) is bringing in the next generation of commercial aircraft, while the A380 is technically a very advanced part of the last generation, that is Bleed-air systems, the 787 is all electric, that is the "wave of the future", expect to see Bleed-air on the A350, expect to see all electric on the Y1 and Y3 projects from Boeing. Also... the claim is that the A380 can hold 800 passengers in all economy layout, but all orders so far call for 550 capacities or lower (I believe), there are several 77x's out there (one for a Japanese carrier) that fly with 550 passengers as well, but in all economy layout. So, I guess the simplest way of saying it (now that I've wasted a whole page) is that with the A380 Airbus put all their eggs in one basket, Boeing released 3 reworked/re-engineered designs and one new one, along with development on 2 more expected within the decade, they diversified and split Airbus's potential market base. Furthermore the A380 was supposed to be in service right now with Emirates and Singapore, but now it looks like the 787 might barely beat the A380 to service (mind you they haven't even built a single 787 yet). Morgans wrote: "Larry Dighera" wrote In a nod to the globalized economy, Boeing is taking a novel step for the company and allowing outside contractors -- many of them overseas -- to design and build 70 percent of the Dreamliner. The wings will come from Japan. Huge parts of the aircraft's body will arrive from Italy. Britain will deliver engines, and China will contribute rudders. France is producing the landing gear... It is fitting, that France is building the landing gear. Seems like their latest project can't quite get off the ground.... ;-) -- Jim in NC |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Last I read, Singapore Airlines is schedule to get an A380 (one) in 4Q
2007 with 25 or so more to be delivered in '08. Shoot... when I read about the A380 a year ago Singapore Airlines was supposed to have one 2 months ago... but here we are, I'm sensing another delay in the "force". |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kingfish" wrote in message oups.com... Last I read, Singapore Airlines is schedule to get an A380 (one) in 4Q 2007 with 25 or so more to be delivered in '08. What you want to bet that they don't get it in '07? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATcox.net wrote: Last I read, Singapore Airlines is schedule to get an A380 (one) in 4Q 2007 with 25 or so more to be delivered in '08. What you want to bet that they don't get it in '07? what odds will you give? -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Gig 601XL Builder wrote: "Kingfish" wrote in message oups.com... Last I read, Singapore Airlines is schedule to get an A380 (one) in 4Q 2007 with 25 or so more to be delivered in '08. What you want to bet that they don't get it in '07? I figger they'll get it done in time. Of course if it's late again it'll probably be free. Reference John Smith's post about Airbus paying $104M in penalties to the 380's first customer (SIA) I can't imagine what the penalties would be for missing the 4Q '07 deadline. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kingfish wrote:
Apples and oranges, of course as they are two completely different category aircraft. Isn't that the whole point? Airbus made apples and the customers wanted oranges. -- Chris W KE5GIX "Protect your digital freedom and privacy, eliminate DRM, learn more at http://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm" Gift Giving Made Easy Get the gifts you want & give the gifts they want One stop wish list for any gift, from anywhere, for any occasion! http://thewishzone.com |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob Noel" wrote in message ... In article , "Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATcox.net wrote: Last I read, Singapore Airlines is schedule to get an A380 (one) in 4Q 2007 with 25 or so more to be delivered in '08. What you want to bet that they don't get it in '07? what odds will you give? 4:1 against. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Chris W wrote: Apples and oranges, of course as they are two completely different category aircraft. Isn't that the whole point? Airbus made apples and the customers wanted oranges. I don't think that's quite accurate, it's not as if *no* airline bought A380s; that aircraft just seems better suited for high density routes in Asia. Boeing's sales success with 787 means (to me) their point 2 point strategy works better for more airlines than the Uberjet. When the U.S. airlines start replacing their fleets, my guess is many will go with 787. The A350 just got the go ahead for development/production & hopefully that program will have better luck sticking with its schedule. Then there's the A320 redesign for 2012-2013 - Airbus can't afford to flub that one as the narrowbodies are the biggest selling segment in transports. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CRS: V-22 Osprey Tilt-Rotor Aircraft | Mike | Rotorcraft | 3 | September 27th 06 04:44 PM |
CRS: V-22 Osprey Tilt-Rotor Aircraft | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | August 30th 06 02:11 PM |
CRS: V-22 Osprey Tilt-Rotor Aircraft | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | October 14th 05 08:14 PM |
America's Hundred Thousand Production Totals | Geoffrey Sinclair | Military Aviation | 11 | May 28th 04 10:37 AM |
Long-range Spitfires and daylight Bomber Command raids (was: #1 Jet of World War II) | The Revolution Will Not Be Televised | Military Aviation | 20 | August 27th 03 09:14 AM |