![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Steven P. McNicoll wrote: wrote: I've got a VFR friend who always files (but doesn't open) an IFR flight plan for longer cross-countries. That way, the flight is in the system for the whole route, so it's (at least alegedly) easier for the controller to find. Not sure how much truth there is to that, but it does make some sense. If it's never opened it will remain a proposed flight plan at the departure point until it times out two hours after the proposed departure time. Controllers along the route will not have it. But if the VFR friend requested FF, it would be "opened" and the controllers would have the strip all along the route, right? |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/10/06 18:45, Jim Carter wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Newps ] Posted At: Sunday, December 10, 2006 6:37 PM Posted To: rec.aviation.ifr Conversation: Flight Following question Subject: Flight Following question ... Just file a regular IFR and pick it up how you normally do. When you get to the point you want to be VFR tell the controller you want to cancel and receive FF. Duh!! That makes perfect sense; I don't know why I was following the VFR altitude for IFR plan thread. Of course that prompts another question: if its that easy to get FF then why bother with the IFR / VFR finagle to start with? Why not just do as you suggest and file IFR with the intention of cancelling over to FF after departure? It can't be that we've got non-instrument rated pilots filing IFR plans can it? Consider also that departing IFR may mean delays and departure routes contrary to what you may be able to get if you depart VFR. -- Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane Cal Aggie Flying Farmers Sacramento, CA |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
![]() John Clonts wrote: But if the VFR friend requested FF, it would be "opened" and the controllers would have the strip all along the route, right? Right. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
: John Clonts wrote:
: : But if the VFR friend requested FF, it would be "opened" and the : controllers would have the strip all along the route, right? : : Right. Ooops... that's what I meant to say in my post, but apparently didn't. He *files* IFR and although doesn't accept an IFR clearance, he does request flight following after takeoff. So, in that instance the strip *is* in the the system throughout, making it easier/more likely for FF handoffs? -Cory -- ************************************************** *********************** * Cory Papenfuss, Ph.D., PPSEL-IA * * Electrical Engineering * * Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University * ************************************************** *********************** |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Carter wrote:
So far, every time I come out of ROG and request flight following to it doesn’t matter where, I get a discrete squawk that allows departure to hand me off to Memphis Center, or Dallas, or Kansas City. Coming out of LIT however I’ve never been given anything except a local code and then about 15 miles out the familiar “radar advisories terminated, squawk VFR, have a nice day”. I specifically tested this twice on Friday, making sure that when I called up clearance delivery and then ground that I made it very plain that I was requesting flight following. Both times, again they dumped me from the system between 15 and 20 miles out. The second time, I forced the issue and stated that I was requesting flight following for the enroute segment if able. I was then given a Memphis enroute code and handed off within about 10 miles. My question for the group is: is there a special terminology that should be used when requesting full-enroute flight following? Or, why do some controllers provide that service automatically and others seemingly only under duress? (I don’t think it is a controller issue, however it might be a facility policy issue). I use a non-demanding request such as ...wonder if you could put me in the computer for flight following to XYZ. That almost always gets it all the way, or least an explanation why they can't. |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
![]() -----Original Message----- From: Mark Hansen ] Posted At: Monday, December 11, 2006 9:22 AM Posted To: rec.aviation.ifr Conversation: Flight Following question Subject: Flight Following question .... Consider also that departing IFR may mean delays and departure routes contrary to what you may be able to get if you depart VFR. -- Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane Cal Aggie Flying Farmers Sacramento, CA Very true Mark. In the case of KLIT however, the IFR departures seem to get the routes they want and the VFR departures all get R or L turn to 270, maintain 2000' or lower until further advised. Seeing you're from SAC I suspect things are quite a bit different on that side of the hill. |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/11/06 17:20, Jim Carter wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Mark Hansen ] Posted At: Monday, December 11, 2006 9:22 AM Posted To: rec.aviation.ifr Conversation: Flight Following question Subject: Flight Following question ... Consider also that departing IFR may mean delays and departure routes contrary to what you may be able to get if you depart VFR. Very true Mark. In the case of KLIT however, the IFR departures seem to get the routes they want and the VFR departures all get R or L turn to 270, maintain 2000' or lower until further advised. Seeing you're from SAC I suspect things are quite a bit different on that side of the hill. I dunno, really ;-) My only IFR departures so far have been training or local practice flights, most of which head straight for the local VOR station before going on course anyway. However, I was speaking in generalities. I'm sure there are some airports where this won't be an issue, but I thought it was worth consideration while planning what type of departure is appropriate for the flight. Best, -- Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane Cal Aggie Flying Farmers Sacramento, CA |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Okay, here's my question. When I get FF on a long trip, often I get handed
off from centers, approaches, etc. to my destination. I have been put "in the system" along the way. How do controllers do that so the handoff happens? Does the original entry into the system generate P strips along the route like an IFR flight? If so, how do they do it so that the flight is not IFR? Do they "force" the VFR aspect like this thread has been discussing? Is the handoff automatic, or does it get coordinated by land line, or both? But if the VFR friend requested FF, it would be "opened" and the controllers would have the strip all along the route, right? |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
![]() LWG wrote: Okay, here's my question. When I get FF on a long trip, often I get handed off from centers, approaches, etc. to my destination. I have been put "in the system" along the way. By the very first controller. How do controllers do that so the handoff happens? Very similar to IFR aircraft. I put in N number, Destination, Type and Altitude. In that order and hit enter. Out spits a center code. Does the original entry into the system generate P strips along the route like an IFR flight? Yes. If so, how do they do it so that the flight is not IFR? The process I listed above is VFR only. The other way is to use the other computer and enter a flight plan and use VFR/075 as an altitude. Either one results in a VFR tag. Do they "force" the VFR aspect like this thread has been discussing? They both result in a VFR tag and strips. Is the handoff automatic, It is automated. Each facility can make the handoff automatic with some massaging of the software. Normally the controller will have to take a positive action to effect the handoff. He'll use his electronic cursor, slew out and enter on the aircraft and hit enter. or does it get coordinated by land line, or both? It can always be manually handed off via the landline. But if the VFR friend requested FF, it would be "opened" and the controllers would have the strip all along the route, right? Yep. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
IFR use of handheld GPS | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 251 | May 19th 06 02:04 PM |
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! | Eliot Coweye | Home Built | 237 | February 13th 06 03:55 AM |
ramifications of new TSA rules on all non-US and US citizen pilots | paul k. sanchez | Piloting | 19 | September 27th 04 11:49 PM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |