![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
... It's him (or anyone else for that matter) that I'm referring to. Just pass over him if you don't want to deal with him. What could be simpler? Of course, if just seeing the name "Mxsmanix" causes some kind of traumatic syndrome or physical pain to set in I'd just like to make him go away. It's like driving by an accident. It takes alot of effort NOT to look. I don't want to expend the effort. I just want him gone. that has to be drowned out by a bottle of Jack Daniels or something, That 'something' would be John Powers Irish Whiskey hell, forget the kill file and leave him up and showing as I've suggested; then invite me over and we'll BOTH get hammered together and forget the crazy SOB ever existed!!!!! :-)) How about at Oshkosh? I'll bring a couple of bottles. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey Dudley,
If you are ever out my way, let me know (contact by e-mail--give me some advanced notice, I do not check yahoo that often :-))) ). I have a bottle of Cutty Sark and one of Johnnie Red, stop by anytime. Would love to talk with you over some "quaint libations". Tell old flying stories (ok, liesLOL) and spend a quiet evening. The wives can compare notes about living with old farts like us!! We will most likely come out on the short end of the discussion stick, but after all these years of married life, what else is new!! ![]() Regards, Paul Dudley Henriques" wrote in message ... "Steve Foley" wrote in message ... "Dudley Henriques" wrote in message ... Save yourself the trouble. I use Outlook Express 6.0 myself and have absolutely no problem whatsoever with avoiding people I don't want to deal with. I just scroll right on past them and go on to something else. This works instantly for all situations as the unwanted poster's heading stands out like a sore thumb and is extremely easy to avoid. Saves the trouble of setting up kill files. filters, whatnot. Works like a charm too :-))))))))) Dudley Henriques I don't want to avoid people, only posts replying to mxsmanic, as if they never existed. It's him (or anyone else for that matter) that I'm referring to. Just pass over him if you don't want to deal with him. What could be simpler? Of course, if just seeing the name "Mxsmanix" causes some kind of traumatic syndrome or physical pain to set in that has to be drowned out by a bottle of Jack Daniels or something, hell, forget the kill file and leave him up and showing as I've suggested; then invite me over and we'll BOTH get hammered together and forget the crazy SOB ever existed!!!!! :-)) Dudley Henriques |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't want to avoid people, only posts replying to mxsmanic, as if they
never existed. Outlook Express does not appear to support a text search withing messages as part of a message rule. If you really feel compelled, you can type most of the header into a message rule as a way to delete any further entries to a thread--since OE won't let you just copy and past the headers. But that will also discard the good, bad, and ugly together. About the most that you can do, that is productive, is to do as Dudley suggested--and if an entire thread has become insufferable, you can right-click any header and "mark the conversation as read". Really the biggest thing you can do is simply to think for most of a minute about whether any further response is *really* needed--because it does not take long to glance at a post, or even read it, but composing a reasonable response is a real time consumer. I did not think much about it until someone posted a list of the top ten contributors for most of December, and I saw my name on it. I then did my own research, and I am sure he was wrong; but it was clear that I was spending *way* too much time--so I have cut back and will cut back much further--and I will especially refrain from challenges that demand a rebuttal, since they are guaranteed to double the time spent. All of that is a really long winded way of saying that it takes a lot of time to compose a message, even without finding and correcting all of the typos, and that if just a few people budget the time they spend, the group will probably become much more readable. Peter Just my $0.02 |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey...that's good Irish booze you're talking about there!! You know God only
invented whiskey to keep the Irish from ruling the world!!! Dudley Henriques "Steve Foley" wrote in message ... "Dudley Henriques" wrote in message ... It's him (or anyone else for that matter) that I'm referring to. Just pass over him if you don't want to deal with him. What could be simpler? Of course, if just seeing the name "Mxsmanix" causes some kind of traumatic syndrome or physical pain to set in I'd just like to make him go away. It's like driving by an accident. It takes alot of effort NOT to look. I don't want to expend the effort. I just want him gone. that has to be drowned out by a bottle of Jack Daniels or something, That 'something' would be John Powers Irish Whiskey hell, forget the kill file and leave him up and showing as I've suggested; then invite me over and we'll BOTH get hammered together and forget the crazy SOB ever existed!!!!! :-)) How about at Oshkosh? I'll bring a couple of bottles. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sounds like fun PR. God knows my wife has a few "stories" about me she just
LOVES to tell people :-)) Dudley Henriques "Paul Riley" wrote in message et... Hey Dudley, If you are ever out my way, let me know (contact by e-mail--give me some advanced notice, I do not check yahoo that often :-))) ). I have a bottle of Cutty Sark and one of Johnnie Red, stop by anytime. Would love to talk with you over some "quaint libations". Tell old flying stories (ok, liesLOL) and spend a quiet evening. The wives can compare notes about living with old farts like us!! We will most likely come out on the short end of the discussion stick, but after all these years of married life, what else is new!! ![]() Regards, Paul Dudley Henriques" wrote in message ... "Steve Foley" wrote in message ... "Dudley Henriques" wrote in message ... Save yourself the trouble. I use Outlook Express 6.0 myself and have absolutely no problem whatsoever with avoiding people I don't want to deal with. I just scroll right on past them and go on to something else. This works instantly for all situations as the unwanted poster's heading stands out like a sore thumb and is extremely easy to avoid. Saves the trouble of setting up kill files. filters, whatnot. Works like a charm too :-))))))))) Dudley Henriques I don't want to avoid people, only posts replying to mxsmanic, as if they never existed. It's him (or anyone else for that matter) that I'm referring to. Just pass over him if you don't want to deal with him. What could be simpler? Of course, if just seeing the name "Mxsmanix" causes some kind of traumatic syndrome or physical pain to set in that has to be drowned out by a bottle of Jack Daniels or something, hell, forget the kill file and leave him up and showing as I've suggested; then invite me over and we'll BOTH get hammered together and forget the crazy SOB ever existed!!!!! :-)) Dudley Henriques |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
He is obviously lonely and a social outcast. He posts so frequently he
probably rarely enjoys any face to face interactions with people. He spends so much time on the computer he probably doesn't have much of a life other than cyberworld. Yet, his confrontational and argumentative responses get him the attention he seeks in his own personal life, all of which is pretty sad. Unfortunately, most of the people who participate in this NG enjoy flying as an avocation. It is supposed to be fun and enjoyable, and much of this is taken away when someone argues simply for the sake of getting attention for themselves. A brief look at his website makes it obvious that he only refers to himself, and that all of his focus is inward. He's so self absorbed it's no wonder he alienates people and doesn't understand why. He simply isn't capable of looking at himself as the root cause of his own problems. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would ignore you before him.
"gwengler" wrote in message ups.com... Obvioulsy, not everyone is of my opinion: Gerd Howdy! In article .com you write: Could everybody PLEASE not contribute to any thread with any posting from Mxsmanic?!!! His postings are spamming up this group to no end. Gerd At least his postings pertain to aviation, unlike your post which simply takes up space. Your post is far more like spam than his. Thank you for taking up space in my killfile. yours, Michael -- Michael and MJ Houghton | Herveus d'Ormonde and Megan O'Donnelly | White Wolf and the Phoenix narrowwares Bowie, MD, USA | http://whitewolfandphoenix.com Proud member of the SCA Internet Whitewash Squad |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You are more likely the outcast get a life.
"Viperdoc" wrote in message ... He is obviously lonely and a social outcast. He posts so frequently he probably rarely enjoys any face to face interactions with people. He spends so much time on the computer he probably doesn't have much of a life other than cyberworld. Yet, his confrontational and argumentative responses get him the attention he seeks in his own personal life, all of which is pretty sad. Unfortunately, most of the people who participate in this NG enjoy flying as an avocation. It is supposed to be fun and enjoyable, and much of this is taken away when someone argues simply for the sake of getting attention for themselves. A brief look at his website makes it obvious that he only refers to himself, and that all of his focus is inward. He's so self absorbed it's no wonder he alienates people and doesn't understand why. He simply isn't capable of looking at himself as the root cause of his own problems. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 14:27:01 -0600, Chris W wrote:
gwengler wrote: Could everybody PLEASE not contribute to any thread with any posting from Mxsmanic?!!! If you really think this plea will have any effect, you're delusional. Okay, that one set me off. The irony of applying the word 'delusional' to a critic of the manic! Oh the critic is the bad guy, rebelling against the right and proper wants of this news group. He can't think straight, imagining things. Right... 'Delusional', huh? Looks like a spit couched in hateful cynicism; would be easily seen, if it weren't for the lack of clear motive. So what is it? Just plain evil? His postings are spamming up this group to no end. Gerd While the posts you are referring to are undesirable, I'm not sure "spam" is the right word for what you are talking about. You're so discerning. So what is the right word? "Instruction"? Little is resolved in his threads. I read those on trimming (w&b) and leaning, unfortunately. Mind-bending from a bent mind. Futile non-resolutions ad infinitum. And if he is then so must be his critics, sadly. Your use of the word 'undesirable' wrt Mxsmanic (or just his posts), and putting it between the opposing views forces me to believe you didn't really mean it. Or undesirable is what you like. Or its what you and a few others demand us to accept. What is your ulterior motive? Frustrated aviators? Anarchy? Always a few of those around. That is not acceptable. Acceptibility must not be universal. Seemingly, (and if so then cowardly), you defend him from angry words from those who likley would do him no harm. You defend one who serves no useful purpose to this world. You defend one who has, and quite stubbornly (with a certain amount of talent), managed to drag a number of professionals into his own dark world they are not trained to deal with. Some just like to argue, so they have Mxsmanic. Some like to watch others argue, so they have him & this news group. The rest of us get little use out of that parasitic relationship, which only serves to realize the simulator to Mxsmanic, when what he really needs is to get out and deal with the real world, or be put away by it. It is queer, psychotic. It isn't difficult to see that the mismated thing should be avoided, or more. -- Michael |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Rhodes wrote:
On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 14:27:01 -0600, Chris W wrote: gwengler wrote: Could everybody PLEASE not contribute to any thread with any posting from Mxsmanic?!!! If you really think this plea will have any effect, you're delusional. Okay, that one set me off. The irony of applying the word 'delusional' to a critic of the manic! The OP was not a critic, it was a plea. My response was not intended to to be a critic on to worthiness of the plea, just the effectiveness of it. Any one posting any message that says something like... "Could everybody PLEASE not post this that or the other thing?", would have received a similar response from me. If you think any such plea will have any effect on posters, you are not just delusional, you are pathetically delusional. Oh the critic is the bad guy, rebelling against the right and proper wants of this news group. He can't think straight, imagining things. Right... 'Delusional', huh? Looks like a spit couched in hateful cynicism; would be easily seen, if it weren't for the lack of clear motive. So what is it? Just plain evil? Cynicism? More like realism, such pathetic pleas will never be useful. His postings are spamming up this group to no end. Gerd While the posts you are referring to are undesirable, I'm not sure "spam" is the right word for what you are talking about. You're so discerning. So what is the right word? I don't know but if you label every piece of undesirable email-type of communication spam, you devalue the meaning of the word. "Instruction"? Little is resolved in his threads. Again my previous post didn't even attempt to address the worthiness of the posts by the subject of this thread. However I will say that while his contributions seem to be pretty worthless, I have learned from some of the other posts in those treads. Some just like to argue, so they have Mxsmanic. Some like to watch others argue, so they have him & this news group. The rest of us get little use out of that parasitic relationship. Then you only have one logical recourse, ignore any such postings. No other course of action (short of killing someone or physically destroying their ability to post) will have any effect and once again if you think . . . never mind I think I made my point already. -- Chris W KE5GIX "Protect your digital freedom and privacy, eliminate DRM, learn more at http://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm" Gift Giving Made Easy Get the gifts you want & give the gifts they want One stop wish list for any gift, from anywhere, for any occasion! http://thewishzone.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MXSMANIC fix and other Trolls | Terry | Piloting | 19 | January 7th 07 10:30 AM |
VFR position reporting | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 154 | November 26th 06 04:45 PM |
For MXSMANIC: Flight Simulator Gear? | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 20 | October 24th 06 11:48 PM |
Please Ignore Mxsmanic | Terry | Piloting | 45 | September 29th 06 08:26 PM |