![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ron" wrote in message ... "Jim Morris" wrote in message ... Why is it called a 734 and not 737-200? It is a 737-400, in ATC abbreviations written as 734. A 737-200 would be written as 742, a 747-400 as 744, etc. Ron -- Non urinat in ventum Thanks. Now I know more than I did this morning, Ron. Knew there had to be logic behind it. Jim Morris |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ATC computers could not handle B737-400. Too many characters
Al "Ron" wrote in message ... "Jim Morris" wrote in message ... Why is it called a 734 and not 737-200? It is a 737-400, in ATC abbreviations written as 734. A 737-200 would be written as 742, a 747-400 as 744, etc. Ron -- Non urinat in ventum |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ATC computers could not handle B737-400. Too many characters
Al "Ron" wrote in message ... "Jim Morris" wrote in message ... Why is it called a 734 and not 737-200? It is a 737-400, in ATC abbreviations written as 734. A 737-200 would be written as 742, a 747-400 as 744, etc. Ron -- Non urinat in ventum |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Scenic" wrote in message ... I think you meant to say a 737-200 would be written as 732. That's correct, my bad. And like Allan9 stated: it's because some ATC computers cannot handle the larger format. Ron -- Non urinat in ventum |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Scenic" wrote in message ... I think you meant to say a 737-200 would be written as 732. That's correct, my bad. And like Allan9 stated: it's because some ATC computers cannot handle the larger format. Ron -- Non urinat in ventum |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Morris" wrote in
: "Ron" wrote in message ... "Jim Morris" wrote in message ... Why is it called a 734 and not 737-200? It is a 737-400, in ATC abbreviations written as 734. A 737-200 would be written as 742, a 747-400 as 744, etc. Ron -- Non urinat in ventum Thanks. Now I know more than I did this morning, Ron. Knew there had to be logic behind it. Now that I have to forget two old things in order to make room for one new thing, I'm trying to give up learning new stuff. Just this morning, I needed to learn a new phone number - cost me arithmetic and hou two tipe gooed... Obb ^^,, |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Morris" wrote in
: "Ron" wrote in message ... "Jim Morris" wrote in message ... Why is it called a 734 and not 737-200? It is a 737-400, in ATC abbreviations written as 734. A 737-200 would be written as 742, a 747-400 as 744, etc. Ron -- Non urinat in ventum Thanks. Now I know more than I did this morning, Ron. Knew there had to be logic behind it. Now that I have to forget two old things in order to make room for one new thing, I'm trying to give up learning new stuff. Just this morning, I needed to learn a new phone number - cost me arithmetic and hou two tipe gooed... Obb ^^,, |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
January 2007 pic in SSA calendar | [email protected] | Soaring | 11 | January 22nd 07 11:02 PM |
PHL: January 20, 2007 - N945UW.jpg | Digital Voices | Aviation Photos | 0 | January 21st 07 12:51 AM |
PHL & PNE: January 17, 2007 (1/5) | Tom Hayden | Aviation Photos | 4 | January 19th 07 06:21 PM |
PHL-PNE January 02 2007 - N60TL.jpg | Digital Voices | Aviation Photos | 0 | January 3rd 07 01:16 AM |