Primary training in a Hi Perf complex acft

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Eeyore writes:

How do you think you get the hours to progress to CPL ? You have to
have a CPL before ATPL etc.... How about the night, multi-engine and
instrument ratings ?

So there's a regulatory barrier? Perhaps. But in practical terms you
can still start and finish on a 747, if money is not a concern. Or
better still, you can learn on a simulator.

Those basic skills are what saves aircraft when things go wrong.

Not when they don't match the aircraft being flown. Having flown a
Piper Cub won't help you much when you're flying an Airbus.

Yes, it will, fjukktard.


I know, I've flown both.


Bertie

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

TheSmokingGnu writes:

A bit like learning to drive a stick in a Ferrari; sure, it can be
done, but you'll probably miss out on a lot of the finer technique,
and man oh man are you going to be sorry if you screw up (and you
will ).

But it's a lot easier to go from a Ferrari to an Escort than the other
way around.


You're a complete idiotoooooo


Bertie

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Eeyore writes:

Because they're more demanding. And I don't just mean they
have 2 power levers.

I'm sure you don't just mean two power levers, because that's not very
demanding at all.

Have you ever heard of the phrase 'trying to learn to run
before you can walk' ?

Yes, but it doesn't apply here. Multiengine aircraft just aren't that
complicated. I don't know how this folk mythology developed, but it
seems to be part of a lot of unconditionally accepted "wisdom" that
afflicts aviation. I see it constantly asserted with religious fervor,
but I don't see it proved, and that's a bad sign.

Does it occur to anyone that the way pilots usually learn to fly today
may not be the _only_ way?

Same goes for night flying and instrument flying.

See above.

I don't see why you can't learn instrument flight, multiengine,
complex, or whatever, all at the same time.

Of course you can't, fjukkwit. You can't learn anything...


Berti e

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Nomen Nescio writes:

The more important question is......
Why do YOU maintain that it's not difficult?

Because I know the procedures, and they are not difficult to follow.
You press buttons and turn knobs.

Bwawhahwhhahwhahwhahhwhahw!

Know how to drag a bug or calcualte gates using predicted winds, the
weight of the airplane and a projected LD based on both?



Didn't think so.

Poof, you just ran out of diesel, fjukkwit.



bertie

Eeyore wrote in
:



Mxsmanic wrote:

Eeyore writes:

Absolutely not.

I know that change is sometimes unpleasant.

You're an idiot.

So are you


Bertie

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Brian writes:

Since you know it is so easy here are a couple things you should be
able to answer

1. What is the difference between a CAT II approach and a CAT III?

Just minimums and stuff; the differences are regulatory.


no they aren', fjukkkwit.

You get yet another thing wrong!

It must be inordinately taxing to be such a boob.





You can use
just about any ILS for either category,


No, you can't. They aren't ILS based systems, fjukktard.





but technically your supposed
to have the approach certified for a maximum category.

In the context I was discussing, though, a non-pilot takes control in
an emergency. In an emergency, you can configure autoland for any ILS
approach, whether it is certified as IIIc or not (I'm not aware of any
differences in the actual ILS hardware from one category to another)

I know you're not. And you don't care that you're wrong.

It's waht makes you so special.



Fjukkwit.


bertie

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip writes:

You couldn't do it, but that, of course, doesn't mean it's
complicated. Bottom line, a crewless airplane with you as their only
hope is going to end up a smoking hole in the ground...

I notice that you still haven't explained the complicated parts.

You gonna pay me to do so? I get about 400 bucks an hour for that.



Bertie

"Matt Barrow" wrote in news:K_hNh.42161
:


"John Mazor" wrote in message
news:A4hNh.2386$xE.1804@trnddc08...

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message By your benighted
standards, brain surgery is just a matter of drilling and cutting. A
butcher, or for that matter, a carpenter, armed with a few anatomy
diagrams ought to be able to do it, right?


He equates it like this: http://www.dmartstores.com/opboargambym.html

Oh ****. i think I just collapsed a lung!



Bertie

Bertie the Bunyip writes:

It can't, fjuccckkkwit.

Airliners do this every day, for many hours at a time.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip writes:

It can't, fjuccckkkwit.

Airliners do this every day, for many hours at a time.

No, they don't, fjukkwit. How do I know this? I just flew one, and a very
automated, ver modern one, for 6 hours.


Bertie