![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Sammy writes: According to you since the whole thing should have been automated, no intervention should have been necessary. The flight should have autolanded safely. Anyone who knows how the automation works would know why the Helios flight would not land safely on its own. I know how it works (I've flown 73's in the past, BTW) and I know why it crashed and I alsop know you';re talking straight out of your ass. You can dream about the fateful day when you save a flight all you want, but the fact is you are the last person a pilot trying to talk down an airliner with a stricken crew would want on the other end of the headset. But for comedy value, I'd just love to see you stand up whne the cabin crew asks "Is there anyone on board who can fly a plane?" Bwawhahwhhahwhahwhahhwhahwhahwhhahwhahwhahwhhahwha hwhahhwhahwhahhwhahwha hwhhahwhahwhhahwhahwhhahwhahwhhahwhahhwhahwhahhwha hwhahwhhahwhahwhhahwha hhwhahwhahwhhahwhahhwhahwhhahwhahwhahhwhahwhahwhha hwhahwhhahwhahhwhahwha hwhahhwhahwhahhwhahwh! Bertie |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Kev" wrote in
oups.com: On Mar 30, 2:06 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Mxsmanic wrote : The Helios flight crashed because nobody could get into the cockpit until the engines ran out of fuel No, it didn't, moron.. No, it didn't what, Bertie? Really, if you're going to argue, try to state your case instead of just flapping your gums. That wasn't an argument fjukkhead. Bertie |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
news ![]() Sammy writes: You tell me. You're making the claim that it's good enough. If you're wrong and people were to do what you say people would die. If a non-pilot attempts to fly by hand because he's afraid the ILS isn't precise enough, the likelihood of a crash is much greater. A non pilot wouldn't know what an ils is djikkkwad. Bertie |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Iain Smith writes: Not true. One of the longest running jet engines in service on a commercial airliner was a CFM56 attached to the port wing of an easyJet Boeing 737 a couple of years ago which had clocked up about 86,000 hours and at that point had never been removed from the wing. However, that was acknowledged to be an exception by a large margin. What does that have to do with MTBF? At least as much as anything you've ever said, wannabe boi. bertie |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Sammy writes: You seem to have some detailed information about this incident. Please cite your references so we can all argue based on the same facts. Actually, just about every news report gave most of the details that I've already provided. However, I've also read much of the final report by the AAIASB, which does contain more detail. Not that oyu understood any of it. Bertie |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
That's rubbish. You said the FMC is programmed from the start (Incorrect, the approach is usually input en-route, but never mind). The approach can be entered into the FMC at any time. No, it can't, fjukktard Bertie Well actually it can, even before take off |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
FMCs aren't programmed for approaches period, you moron Bertie Well yes they are. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Flydive wrote in :
Bertie the Bunyip wrote: FMCs aren't programmed for approaches period, you moron Bertie Well yes they are. Uh, no they're not. Only sids and stars, unless you mean an RNAV app. Airplane still uses the navaids intended for the appp. Bertie |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Flydive wrote in :
Bertie the Bunyip wrote: That's rubbish. You said the FMC is programmed from the start (Incorrect, the approach is usually input en-route, but never mind). The approach can be entered into the FMC at any time. No, it can't, fjukktard Bertie Well actually it can, even before take off Can't be entered at all. Now way anything flying will do an ILS all by it's lonesomes from takeoff just by using the FMC. Bertie |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Flydive wrote in : Bertie the Bunyip wrote: FMCs aren't programmed for approaches period, you moron Bertie Well yes they are. Uh, no they're not. Only sids and stars, unless you mean an RNAV app. Airplane still uses the navaids intended for the appp. Bertie Or NDB, VOR, GPS.......(and both laterally and vertically) Of course ILS are still flown using navaids, but all others no. And above it was not specified you were talking only about ILS |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Off-topic, but in need of help | dennis | Aviation Photos | 0 | January 4th 07 10:40 PM |
Almost on topic... | Richard Lamb | Home Built | 22 | January 30th 06 06:55 PM |
off topic, just a little--maybe? | L.D. | Home Built | 5 | August 27th 05 04:56 PM |
off topic | Randall Robertson | Simulators | 0 | January 2nd 04 01:29 PM |