Why The Hell... (random rant)

writes:

Not at airplane altitudes and speeds.

Then why are they marked on the charts?

Well, I can see electricity can be added to that ever growing list
of things about which you know nothing.

Are you saying that sparks are something other than electricity? What are
they, then?

Magnetos generate pulses measured in the thousand of volts and microamps
of current.

Volts? Microamps? These units are used in electrical engineering, not
plumbing.

Even if they were hooked to something else, which they
aren't, the power generated would be useless for powering something like
a GPS.

But that wasn't the assertion. The assertion was that there was no
electricity in some aircraft. If they have typical powerplants, there is
electricity.

My god, everytime you say something, more ignorance just roles out.

I'm not the one making the mistakes.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

Nomen Nescio writes:

Since self audits are always suspect ...

I'll remember this the next time someone here claims to be a qualified pilot.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

writes:

A smart person wouldn't keep spouting the same ignorant nonsense
after they've been given references to eliminate the ignorance.

True, but that is hardly relevant here.

I know from experience that stupid people rapidly become hostile, abusive, and
emotional in debates, because they have only their emotions upon which to base
their behavior (not having much of an intellect by definition). The more
stupid they are, the more abusive, hostile, and emotional they become. Smart
people do not have this handicap and so do not show this behavior,
particularly since intellect is much more useful than emotion in debate and
thus rarely leads to frustration.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

RomeoMike writes:

OK, before I get flamed, I know that the compass needle always points to
magnetic north ...

Actually it always aligns with the magnetic field in which it is placed, which
often means that it points roughly to magnetic north, but not always, as the
geomagnetic field is quite irregular.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

d.g.s. writes:

You snipped the part of the post where I quoted the example, thus
destroying the context my question quoted above, a very dishonest
practice ...

No, simply an accepted means of saving bandwidth. You snipped everything
except my reply and the sentence that immediately preceded it. Why would it
be dishonest for me, but not for you?

Why did you do this?

See above.

Is this another example of how you practice the Golden Rule?

Yes.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

In rec.aviation.piloting Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

Not at airplane altitudes and speeds.

Then why are they marked on the charts?

Why are not what marked on the charts?

snip

But that wasn't the assertion. The assertion was that there was no
electricity in some aircraft. If they have typical powerplants, there is
electricity.

Spewing idiot, by that interpretation, there is electricity when you
shuffle across the rug.

That is NOT what people are talking about when they are talking about
powering things.

Have you not the slightest bit of common sense?

snip

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

In rec.aviation.piloting Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

A smart person wouldn't keep spouting the same ignorant nonsense
after they've been given references to eliminate the ignorance.

True, but that is hardly relevant here.

Tell us again how gyroscopes and INS works.

snip

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

On 4/5/2007 6:53 PM Mxsmanic jumped down, turned around, and wrote:

d.g.s. writes:

You snipped the part of the post where I quoted the example, thus
destroying the context my question quoted above, a very dishonest
practice ...

No, simply an accepted means of saving bandwidth. You snipped everything
except my reply and the sentence that immediately preceded it. Why would it
be dishonest for me, but not for you?

First, show how I snipped your reply and the sentence that immediately
preceded it.

Also, show where I claimed that I followed this so-called "Golden Rule."
*You're* the one who made this claim, not me.

Also, show where I claimed that it *WASN'T* dishonest for me to do so.
If you're being dishonest, then according to the Golden Rule, you should
be perfectly content with me being dishonest also.

Also, your "accepted means of saving bandwidth" is merely a dishonest
dodge in an attempt to cover up your dishonesty, while bleating on and
on about how honest you really are. Why do you feel this need to be
so dishonest?

Why did you do this?

See above.

See what above?

Is this another example of how you practice the Golden Rule?

Yes.

It shows. But if this is such an example, then you have no cause to
complain about the treatment you receive here, as it is consistent with
the responses you get in many of the Usenet forums in which you, um,
"participate."
--
dgs

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
Nomen Nescio writes:

But your altitude is much more important than ground track.

You cannot find your altitude with a compass alone.

Why not three.

Three adds mostly redundancy rather than any additional functionality in
lateral navigation.

But it powers NO electronics in the plane.

The assertion was that there was no electricity. I've demonstrated this
assertion to be incorrect if the aircraft is powered by a typical
reciprocating gasoline engine.


You haven't demonstrated anything but your ignorance.

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
writes:

Not at airplane altitudes and speeds.

Then why are they marked on the charts?

Well, I can see electricity can be added to that ever growing list
of things about which you know nothing.

Are you saying that sparks are something other than electricity? What are
they, then?

Magnetos generate pulses measured in the thousand of volts and microamps
of current.

Volts? Microamps? These units are used in electrical engineering, not
plumbing.

Even if they were hooked to something else, which they
aren't, the power generated would be useless for powering something like
a GPS.

But that wasn't the assertion. The assertion was that there was no
electricity in some aircraft. If they have typical powerplants, there is
electricity.

My god, everytime you say something, more ignorance just roles out.

I'm not the one making the mistakes.


You can talk more **** than a Jap radio.