Aviation Beer

Jay Honeck wrote:

Be careful. Some counties, like the one I live
in, are "zero-tolerance." There is NO legal BAC.

Which means that even one beer, regardless of the
effects on your driving, count as a DUI.


So, did you think I was posting from my car?

No, no, don't get me wrong, I'm still bitter about a situation
I had some time ago.


Let me get this straight: You have NO legal blood alchohol level where
you live? A glass of wine with dinner is now completely illegal in
your county?

That's sickening.


Don't forget stupid, ****ed up, stupid. They even changed the
name of the charge to DUII from DWI because it's now "Driving
Under the Influence of Intoxicants" rather than "Driving
While Intoxicated" because the "0.08" doesn't count here.
Yes, cold medicines count.

But think about it. Someone ****es you off, all you have to do
is follow them around a little while, witness them having A beer
somewhere and getting in their car. A simple cell phone call
later and you don't even have to be at the arrest because the
cops will take them in and breathalyzer them.

Could ruin an ATP dream. Or put it off for a very long time.

Judah wrote:

Jose wrote in news:GoO7i.24890$JZ3.3963
@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net:


They've driven the smokers out into the cold,

Well, I for one rejoice at that. Smokers should be driven out not
because it harms them to smoke (if you want to hurt yourself, be my
guest) but because it fouls the air for other people for days.


I haven't smoked in a long time, so I'm not upset that the laws supposedly
protect me from second-hand smoke, but I think they've taken it too far in
many areas.

In Seattle, for example, you are not allowed to smoke within 25' of a
building. I think that's ridiculous.

25' of a door or a window that opens. Stupid.

"Erik" wrote in message
...
Judah wrote:

Jose wrote in news:GoO7i.24890$JZ3.3963
@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net:


They've driven the smokers out into the cold,

Well, I for one rejoice at that. Smokers should be driven out not
because it harms them to smoke (if you want to hurt yourself, be my
guest) but because it fouls the air for other people for days.

Just like a SFB jackbooted thug to tell someone how to live on THEIR
property.

I haven't smoked in a long time, so I'm not upset that the laws
supposedly protect me from second-hand smoke, but I think they've taken
it too far in many areas.

You do know that the "studies" about second-hand smoke were completely
bogus, dont you?


In Seattle, for example, you are not allowed to smoke within 25' of a
building. I think that's ridiculous.

25' of a door or a window that opens. Stupid.

What are those thugs smoking?

Judah wrote:


In New York, they have made it impossible to smoke at any restaurant or
Bar. I think that's also ridiculous.

The law should require some sort of signage on the restaurant to indicate
that is a smoking establishment, and if you don't like smoke, you don't go
there... If there is concern that all restaurants would choose to be
smoking restaurants (which they wouldn't) they could put an incentive in
for restaurants and bars that completely smoke free.

If a man owns a small business, he can't smoke in his office, even if he's
the only one there. I say let him smoke if he takes the necessary
precautions to prevent his smoke from venting into the rest of the
building.

The laws for asbestos are less rigid than the laws for cigarrete smoke.

I love Paris. People smoke everywhere.
No one complains.


I don't smoke anymore but...jesus cut the crappy state-control-of-every-
friggin' thing.

For those who do smoke, I encourage you to stop. If you were able to look
inside yourselves (I occasionally look inside many of you) you'd be horrified
to see what's goin' on.
Keep trying. It is possible.

--
Message posted via AviationKB.com
http://www.aviationkb.com/Uwe/Forums...ation/200706/1

On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 16:15:38 GMT, "Kloudy via AviationKB.com"
u33403@uwe wrote in 730e24cd823c8@uwe:

For those who do smoke, I encourage you to stop. If you were able to look
inside yourselves (I occasionally look inside many of you) you'd be horrified
to see what's goin' on.

How long after you quit does it take for your insides to look better?

Larry Dighera wrote:


How long after you quit does it take for your insides to look better?

Varies according to how much smoke done-gone-in and for how long.
One thing is for certain, things start improving immediately. Just some
things may not get completely repaired.

Sadly, for some it might never get better.


(Mainly cuz they gonna die first) : (

--
Message posted via AviationKB.com
http://www.aviationkb.com/Uwe/Forums...ation/200706/1

On Thu, 31 May 2007 15:43:38 -0700, Erik wrote:

Be careful. Some counties, like the one I live
in, are "zero-tolerance." There is NO legal BAC.

Erik, would you mind telling us what country you live in?

--
Dallas

Dallas wrote:
Be careful. Some counties, like the one I live
in, are "zero-tolerance." There is NO legal BAC.

Erik, would you mind telling us what country you live in?

I think he wrote COUNT-IES

--
Message posted via http://www.aviationkb.com

Jay Honeck wrote:

Soon, we won't be able to go for a walk after dinner without complying
with a mandatory helmet law...

Isn't that on the ballot this fall?


-m
--
## Mark T. Dame
## CP-ASEL, AGI
## insert tail number here
## KHAO, KISZ
". . . computer science becomes the "art of computer science" because
so few formal techniques are available to ensure success."
-- C: The Complete Reference, Herbert Schildt

Viperdoc wrote:

I agree that talking about beer is preferable to inane questions about
mythological autopilots, and much more fun.

If my mythological autopilot drinks an aviation themed beer in a county
that outlaws driving while smoking, how long do I have to wait before it
can fly a coordinated turn?


-m
--
## Mark T. Dame
## CP-ASEL, AGI
## insert tail number here
## KHAO, KISZ
". . . computer science becomes the "art of computer science" because
so few formal techniques are available to ensure success."
-- C: The Complete Reference, Herbert Schildt