![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#141
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Erik" wrote in message ... Mxsmanic wrote: Erik writes: 3) Meet me in real life, I'll beat the living daylights out of you just to make me feel better. Yep, violent, but who gives a ****? District attorneys do. You've established premeditation, for one thing. It's a really bad idea to threaten people in writing, especially in written forms that will be archived indefinitely and exposed to public view. It can work against you in ways you may not at all suspect. Bull ****. If you ever disappear the list of documented suspects will be so long, I seriously doubt the authorities would even begin to look. You are clearly the poster child for justifiable homicide. |
#142
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Maxwell" wrote in
: "Dudley Henriques" wrote in message news:2007061101084716807-dhenriques@rcncom... Bertie is correct. Barrel Rolls are perhaps the most misquoted and misunderstood maneuver done in an airplane. Basically, you can do a barrel roll as loosely or as tight as the airplane's flight envelope will allow. You can also enter a BR from many different flight conditions involving many different g loadings. The main thing to remember about barrel rolls is that they are a 3 dimensional maneuver through 3 dimensional space and that the common denominator in a barrel roll regardless of the g used is that it will remain POSITIVE all the way around. The one exception to this would be after the pull and roll application, you can unload the airplane over the top and drop the g to +1 if you like to loosen the roll rate, but that g must be regained during the recovery. Basically, you will be somewhere over +1g in the entry as you raise the nose, then at some positive +g throughout the roll ranging from as unloaded as you want to loosen up the airplane or as high a positive g and tight a roll as the envelope will allow. As long as the airplane transverses 3 dimensions through the roll, it's a barrel roll. I've done them as loose as a 90 degree change of direction at the top apex in a P51,the F8F, and several jets including the T38, and as tight as a corkscrew in a Pitts S1Sl which was highly loaded with +g and extremely tight. Bob Hoover's rather famous Iced tea stunt in the Shrike is probably responsible for much of the misconception about barrel rolls. He does them fairly loose and with just enough positive g on the airplane to keep the glass from spilling without stressing the airplane. The "secret" to Bob's tea trick is simply his smoothness through the roll as much as keeping positive g on the tea. It's really this smoothness that makes this stunt possible, as although positive g will keep the tea inside the glass. (You can actually POUR tea as you're rolling the airplane but ONLY if you're as smooth as Hoover :-) The reason smoothness is so necessary for the tea trick is that even though you might have positive g on the airplane and in effect doing a barrel roll, if you are not perfectly coordinated through the roll (any excessive yaw for example) your tea will slide off the glare shield laterally and you don't want that......not if you're Bob Hoover anyway :-) So it's positive g for the roll, and smoothness and perfect coordination for the tea stunt. I'm not talking about Bob's tea trick. Obvoiusly, positive Gs and coordination is the key there. And I'm not sure I understand or agree with your post. But I think it might be possible we having a terminology issue here with the definition of a barrel roll. Nope. The thing is, you can`t do anything at all at one G except straight and level flight. Period, Endo fo story, finnito spaghettio. Nothing to do with terminology or anything else. It's just a BS legend that has been repeated so many times that it's dug it's own groove in the urban legend record. Bertie |
#143
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Maxwell" wrote in
: "Dudley Henriques" wrote in message news:2007061116042375249-dhenriques@rcncom... On 2007-06-11 12:39:10 -0400, "Maxwell" said: No. Barrel rolls do NOT go negative generally. If you went negative you would change the roll arc and destroy the roll. You can unload to 0 g through the top however without destroying the roll arc, but if you do, you have to reapply positive g almost immediately as you pass through inverted to regain the roll arc. As I said, you can do a barrel roll at any positive g; as tight or as little as the flight envelope for the aircraft will allow up to 90 degrees of flight path direction change at the roll apex. Generally the roll profile will be the application of positive g above +1 from the roll initiation (either from level flight or from a slight dive offset to gain energy if needed) followed by coordinated roll and back pressure into the roll arc maintaining positive g with varying back pressure to maintain the roll arc through the roll and through the recovery back to the entry heading. You can NOT at any time during a barrel roll, allow the g to go negative as doing so will instantly destroy the arc of the roll. Dudley Henriques No it won't, and yes you can. Nope. You';re wrong dude. That's OK, you can go on being wrong. I don't have to fly with you. .... Bertie |
#144
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: writes: You aren't attached to the horizon while in an aircraft in flight, simulator boy, you are attached to the aircraft. You aren't attached to either, Well, you aren't attached to earth in any significant fashion anyway.. Bertie |
#145
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Maxwell writes: A 1g barrel roll can be done, but the required trajectory of the aircraft is not going to be one that is necessarily eye pleasing for ground demonstration purposes. Any maneuver that involves a change in altitude will involve forces exceeding 1 G at some point. Nope, wrong again fjukktard. Bertie |
#146
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#147
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: writes: Actually, with respect to maintaining one g into the seat and doing a kind of roll, you can, or at least Newton says so, but I'm not sure the airplane exists that has the control authority to do it. If you search the groups you'll be able to find the analysis, but the short form is this. The airplane has got to accelelerate downward at 1 G, then pull a G in a coordinated bank. It'll roll, but it won't be pretty, and the pilot will feel 1 G into the seat. You cannot climb without exceeding 1 G, and you cannot stop a descent without exceeding 1 G, either. Yes, you can fjukktard. You are, of course, talking straight out of your ass yet again Bertie |
#148
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: writes: My I suggest you revisit Newton's laws of motion? My post is based on them. No, it isn't How can you climb or descend from one altitude to another without any vertical acceleration? Easy., I do it almost daily, fjukkwit. And since the acceleration due to gravity is constant, how can any positive increase in rate of climb not result in total acceleration exceeding 1 G? A simple example would suffice. Reread your post fjukktard. Not that that will make any diference, but you're talking about at least three different things here. Of course, if you flew you would know that. But you don't and never will. Bertie |
#149
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Nomen Nescio writes: By already being in a climb at "one altitude" and maintaining it through "another". At some point your vertical speed must change, and then your net acceleration will change as well. Wrong! It's not! It is constant for all practical purposes. Nope. If one G is defined as 32.2 ft/sec/sec, it can be done. I'll leave it to you to figure out how. It cannot be done, and you cannot demonstrate otherwise. I could if you would get into an airplane, But you wont. Bertie |
#150
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
george wrote in news:1181596437.557910.199630
@a26g2000pre.googlegroups.com: On Jun 12, 1:53 am, "ManhattanMan" wrote: Bertie the Bunyip wrote: I think he probably tried Viagra, but found it only made him taller. Boom! Head shot! ![]() Or straight over the top :-) You are awarded the kooks tail and both ears Thenkew. Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question: Standard rate turns, constant rate turns, and airspeed | Robert Barker | Piloting | 5 | April 15th 07 04:47 PM |
CAP Orientation Pilot? | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 7 | August 3rd 05 02:22 AM |
ADV: AVIATION T-SHIRTS & HEAD GEAR | Kates Saloon and Knife Emporium | General Aviation | 0 | December 30th 03 11:37 AM |
ADV: GREAT AVIATION T-SHIRTS & HEAD GEAR | Kates Saloon and Knife Emporium | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | December 30th 03 11:36 AM |
sounds of aviation navigation equipment as head on a scanner radio | Dan Jacobson | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | December 4th 03 07:27 PM |