GA costly? Try TV...

Some Other Guy wrote:
I wonder if he's aware that there's
not a lot of places that puppy can land.

That's the first thing I thought of when I read of a private A380.

Viperdoc wrote:
Is this from personal experience buying your own fleet of simulated
aircraft?

Where instead of a date and serial number, a "approximate download time"
is provided? G

Jonathan Goodish wrote:

That assumes that there's always something worth watching on television.
Usually, there isn't.

I even have a TiVO, and there STILL isn't much programming that
interests me. I'm not a TV sports fan, so about half of the potential
is eliminated. News and weather are much better obtained on the web. I
don't like sitcoms or game shows, and I don't shop on my TV.

Come to think of it, if I wasn't married, I wouldn't need TV at all.
The same goes for a land line phone.

"JGalban via AviationKB.com" u32749@uwe wrote in message
news:73f2fde80f39c@uwe...

I'm not surprised. You don't have to pay that much for TV, but if you
want to receive every premium channel available, $1500/ yr. is quite
doable.
I'm not sure what the lady would be complaining about, though. It's not
like
anyone is forcing her to subscribe to all of those premium channels.

The amount of money you can squander on various services (TV, mobile
phone,
etc...) is growing rapidly. I'm amazed at the amounts of money that my
friends tell me they spend on things like cell phone service. The base
prices don't sound too bad, but when you start adding in all of the extras
like messaging charges and mobile Internet access, the annual outlay
starts
to look ridiculous.

$1500 /yr. is slightly more than I pay for all of my
telecommunications/entertainment services combined. That includes TV,
home
phone, cell phone and high speed Internet.

Ah...the money people will spend to turn their brains into a scrambled mass
of jello!

Viperdoc writes:

No one gives a **** about your pontificating and unfounded posts.

Perhaps you do not, but others can speak for themselves.

B A R R Y writes:

That's the first thing I thought of when I read of a private A380.

The objective is probably to land wherever the aircraft will be see by the
most people, and most airports in that category could handle an A380.

Mxsmanic wrote in
news
Viperdoc writes:

Noone gives a **** about your pontificating and unfounded posts.

Perhaps you do not, but others can speak for themselves.


Noone gives a **** about your pontificating and unfounded posts.


Bertie

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

B A R R Y writes:

That's the first thing I thought of when I read of a private A380.

The objective is probably to land wherever the aircraft will be see by
the most people, and most airports in that category could handle an
A380.


The category?


Bwahawhawhahwhahwhhahwhahwhahhwhahwhahwhha!


Bertie

"Nomen Nescio" wrote in message
...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

From: Mxsmanic

Viperdoc writes:

No one gives a **** about your pontificating and unfounded posts.

Perhaps you do not, but others can speak for themselves.

I'll give a ****.
And if you post your mailing address, I'll send it to you.

Do a whois for atkielski.com

Hi,

In article ,
El wrote:
Do a whois for atkielski.com

He recently denied that was his site...

Andy