![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay,
Put an O-540 in it, though, and look out. I think it would be a real ass-kicker. I still don't see how. A real gas-guzzler, yes. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Put an O-540 in it, though, and look out. I think it would be a real
ass-kicker. I still don't see how. A real gas-guzzler, yes. Well, my O-540-powered Pathfinder, with fixed gear, will absolutely walk away from an Arrow. It only follows that our engine in an airframe with gear that disappears should be pretty danged quick. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
Put an O-540 in it, though, and look out. I think it would be a real ass-kicker. I still don't see how. A real gas-guzzler, yes. Well, my O-540-powered Pathfinder, with fixed gear, will absolutely walk away from an Arrow. Yes, but at a huge fuel consumption penalty. And I doubt you will walk away from a 200 HP Arrow very quickly. A 180 HP Arrow is a fair big doggier than a 200 HP version. Matt |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thomas Borchert wrote:
2. Mercedes's output is so high that even if they quit making an engine Thielert needs, it would be no problem at all for them to buy 20 years worth of supply right before Merc shuts the production line down. The car manufacturing numbers just are that much bigger. Our market is tiny. In the old days people who lived and breathed aviation designed and built engines (and aircraft) because it was in their DNA and they owned most or all of the company. They made a fair profit, built a lot of engines and airplanes that people could afford and life was good. Then over the years lawyers came along and started advertising for lawsuits and caused a lot of these hard working aviation businesses to go bankrupt in a single lawsuit over ae crash which in all likelhood was caused by pilot error. They could make millions in a few months off of of the decades of hard work of these little aircraft companies. After most of the blood was sucked away, (a day late and a dollar short as usual) the government stepped in and passed a few laws to prevent the last few drops from being sucked. The lawyers had by then developed and perfected "IV" sucking devices for a number of different industries that could still suck a lot of blood, whil insurance companies sucked up the rest. The result is the small innovative companies can not compete in the marketplace because they just don't have the capital to pay the insurance, taxes and all the other liabilities that go with it and make enough profit to make it worth the effort. If they do make a profit, the lawyers will be ready to suck it all away when the first mishap occurs. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]() http://www.dieselair.com/ Fun site ....much reading. Paul-Mont That's a great site; thanks for the link! I was surprised how well DeltaHawk is doing, as I did not know of the UAV relationship. I'd love to hang their 200hp model on a Velocity, but have some doubts about what I would do if the engine went tango uniform in Dodge City. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Well, my O-540-powered Pathfinder, with fixed gear, will absolutely walk away from an Arrow. Trade a Plane lists the 75% cruise of the Pathfinder at 133 knots, which is about what the later Arrows do. The Dakota is listed at 144. Earlier models of the Arrow are a little faster. Mine routinely shows 150 knots at best power, but I found out last month that my ASI is lying :-( Nice feeling, though. Unfortunately, the GPS tells me that I ALWAYS have headwinds. Anyway, these are all draggy airframes, not worth trying to enhance. Cramped interior, noisy, drafty. The only thing they really offer is cheaper. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul,
Anyway, these are all draggy airframes, not worth trying to enhance. Cramped interior, noisy, drafty. The only thing they really offer is cheaper. Well put. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anyway, these are all draggy airframes, not worth trying to enhance.
Cramped interior, noisy, drafty. The only thing they really offer is cheaper. Well put. Dunno about "cramped" -- I'm 6 feet tall, and have plenty of room. "Noisy" is something that comes with all prop-driven, piston-powered aircraft, as far as I can tell. ANR headsets solve that. Drafty? You've got a problem that can be easily fixed. Poke around on the Cherokee Pilots Association "Cherokee Chat" and you will find much good advice about getting rid of air leaks in your Arrow. I had the same problem in our Warrior, and ended up with a draft-free cabin, after doing a few simple things. (Atlas is remarkably air-tight. I've not had to do ANYTHING in the five years we've owned it. In fact, I just won a new door seal in the drawings at the CPA fly-in, and have swapped it with the donor for a discount on a landing light blinker system. No need for the seal!) -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message oups.com... Anyway, these are all draggy airframes, not worth trying to enhance. Cramped interior, noisy, drafty. The only thing they really offer is cheaper. Well put. Dunno about "cramped" -- I'm 6 feet tall, and have plenty of room. How W I D E are you? I'm 6'1", but I wear a size 48 jacket. In most aircraft, my passenger has to sit semi-sideways. -- Matt Barrow Performance Homes, LLC. Cheyenne, WY |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay,
Dunno about "cramped" -- I'm 6 feet tall, and have plenty of room. Have you flown a Bo, a Cirrus, a Socata TB for long distance? If you haven't, you don't know the meaning of "plenty of room" ;-) -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cessna Cardinal 177 RG II v. Piper Arrow III (70s) v. Piper Arrow III (brand new) | [email protected] | Piloting | 90 | September 23rd 06 12:48 AM |
Wanted expander tube for piper j3 brakes | Jean-Claude Audin | Home Built | 0 | June 10th 05 06:26 PM |
Piper PA-22 Wheel Pants wanted | Jerry | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | October 20th 04 01:11 AM |
Wacky question-plane and bass!! | Frode Berg | Piloting | 8 | May 18th 04 11:23 PM |
Wanted clever PA32 engineer's thoughts - Gear extention problem on Piper Lance | [email protected] | Owning | 5 | July 22nd 03 12:35 AM |