![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
El Maximo writes:
So the answer is NO, you haven't tried flight with a beautiful girl sitting next to you? The answer is obviously yes. And if anything, it would be even more difficult to distract me in a real aircraft than in a simulator, as there is more to hold my attention, and more at stake if my attention drifts. I didn't think so. It doesn't take much intelligence to know the difference between real flight and simulated flight. Actually, successful simulation often requires more intelligence than unsuccessful simulation. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ha!
Someone offered the observation 'clueless'. There are more technical terms (see the DSM) but that fits nicely. On Jul 11, 10:36 am, Mxsmanic wrote: Tina writes: In this case IMC equals flying in the clouds, Mx. There is nothing to see outside. But the clouds may hide other aircraft. You need to be on the radio to maintain separation with ATC, not dealing with cockpit distractions. I noted in one of your posts while flying the simulator you had a beautiful woman by your side, and she was not a distraction. Yes. What power of concentration you must have. Not at all. I'm simply not a buck deer in rut, and my behavior is controlled by my brain, not my hormones. I would feel slighted if my husband kept his interest on a computer game if I was trying to distract him. I am not your husband. Maybe it's that he is being very kind, but he allows himself to be distracted easily in those circumstances. The answer to that might displease you. Men know how to fake things, too. You might find from a relationship standpoint you'd do better if you allowed such distractions from time to time. I'm not interested in a relationship, I'm interested in aviation. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
... The answer is obviously yes. I'm sorry, I forgot you can't tell reality from simulation. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "El Maximo" wrote in message ... "Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... Ol Shy & Bashful writes: THAT IS A DISTRACTION.........ggg Not if you really like flying. Since you have stated you have no interest in sex, and no interest in real flying, on what do you base this statement? My worse distraction ever was my wife getting out of wet clothes after running to the airplane during a cloudburst. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 Mxsmanic wrote: Tina writes: In this case IMC equals flying in the clouds, Mx. There is nothing to see outside. But the clouds may hide other aircraft. You need to be on the radio to maintain separation with ATC, not dealing with cockpit distractions. If you're IMC, you won't be maintaining separation with anything, because there isn't anything for you to see. ATC will be responsible for the separation. I noted in one of your posts while flying the simulator you had a beautiful woman by your side, and she was not a distraction. Yes. What power of concentration you must have. Not at all. I'm simply not a buck deer in rut, and my behavior is controlled by my brain, not my hormones. If everyone here had a nickel for everytime they've heard that (especially from their friends or children)... They'd have a dime. I would feel slighted if my husband kept his interest on a computer game if I was trying to distract him. I am not your husband. Thank the gods. But she has a point. If you're going to be that attuned to a game over your significant other, you have some serious social problems. Not that we didn't know this already to begin with... Maybe it's that he is being very kind, but he allows himself to be distracted easily in those circumstances. The answer to that might displease you. Men know how to fake things, too. You don't know about their lives together to be able to come to the assumption that he is doing so. Don't let your ineptness become the justified norm for someone else. You might find from a relationship standpoint you'd do better if you allowed such distractions from time to time. I'm not interested in a relationship, I'm interested in aviation. I honestly don't think you could handle a relationship. Yes, you are interested in aviation, but once again, with the attitude you have and the misguided assumptions you have about things in aviation, You either a) have a long way to go and a lot to unlearn before you can even learn anything in aviation, or b) you couldn't handle aviation. BL. - -- Brad Littlejohn | Email: Unix Systems Administrator, | Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! ![]() PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGlRbYyBkZmuMZ8L8RAhJ9AJ48TskMTFal4oRnWb3gfZ shoPC0TQCg5krn jNJFDHGabBXRcZMsWrevZlw= =gkU1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 11, 10:38 am, Tina wrote:
Ha! Someone offered the observation 'clueless'. There are more technical terms (see the DSM) but that fits nicely. On Jul 11, 10:36 am, Mxsmanic wrote: Tina writes: In this case IMC equals flying in the clouds, Mx. There is nothing to see outside. But the clouds may hide other aircraft. You need to be on the radio to maintain separation with ATC, not dealing with cockpit distractions. I noted in one of your posts while flying the simulator you had a beautiful woman by your side, and she was not a distraction. Yes. What power of concentration you must have. Not at all. I'm simply not a buck deer in rut, and my behavior is controlled by my brain, not my hormones. I would feel slighted if my husband kept his interest on a computer game if I was trying to distract him. I am not your husband. Maybe it's that he is being very kind, but he allows himself to be distracted easily in those circumstances. The answer to that might displease you. Men know how to fake things, too. You might find from a relationship standpoint you'd do better if you allowed such distractions from time to time. I'm not interested in a relationship, I'm interested in aviation.- He can have the best of both worlds. Use the FMC to guide the plane under VFR (so he's not distracted by that pesky simulated ATC voice), on a long flight between say....LGA and LAX. Then he has a nice four hours or so to be "distracted." Of course, the "beautiful woman" that is his distraction is probably a Playboy magazine anyway g BTW: MY significant other gets royally PO'd if I am not significantly distracted enough when I am WORKING at home, let alone playing a stupid flight simulator. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug Semler writes:
He can have the best of both worlds. Use the FMC to guide the plane under VFR (so he's not distracted by that pesky simulated ATC voice) ... There's no FMC in the Baron, and I normally don't fly VFR in the big iron. BTW: MY significant other gets royally PO'd if I am not significantly distracted enough when I am WORKING at home, let alone playing a stupid flight simulator. If you actually fly that way, perhaps your epitaph could say "He was distracted." |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A Guy Called Tyketto writes:
If you're IMC, you won't be maintaining separation with anything, because there isn't anything for you to see. ATC will be responsible for the separation. That's why I said "you need to be on the radio to maintain separation with ATC." Thank the gods. But she has a point. If you're going to be that attuned to a game over your significant other, you have some serious social problems. I don't have a significant other, so the issue does not arise. You don't know about their lives together to be able to come to the assumption that he is doing so. I haven't assumed that he is doing so; but neither do I take for granted that he is not. I honestly don't think you could handle a relationship. I don't know. But since I'm not interested in one, it doesn't matter. I doubt that I could handle skiing or scuba diving, either, but I'm not interested in those, so it doesn't matter. Yes, you are interested in aviation, but once again, with the attitude you have and the misguided assumptions you have about things in aviation, You either a) have a long way to go and a lot to unlearn before you can even learn anything in aviation, or b) you couldn't handle aviation. With a girl in a bikini in the right seat, you'd be far better off with me in the left seat than with some of the macho men here. It amazes me that so-called pilots are so quick to compromise safety. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
... snip I normally don't fly snip. Nuff said |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Distractions? Very distracting. | Paul Tomblin | Piloting | 18 | July 10th 07 12:34 AM |
Contracts and Corruption,partisanship and distractions =Neocon takeover | fusion | Naval Aviation | 0 | May 24th 07 09:22 PM |
Unusual classified ad | Adam Aulick | Owning | 22 | August 10th 05 06:04 PM |
Unusual ECI Cylinder | [email protected] | Home Built | 4 | July 7th 05 01:27 AM |
Unusual Request | ddddd | Piloting | 5 | May 1st 04 03:33 PM |