![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Big John wrote:
I asked MX a series of technical questions and he let them slide. Guess he is one of the trolls active here ![]() list. Mx is indeed THE troll here, but I think you were/are talking to an imposter Mx who has been making many bogus trolls in the name of the troll on several threads, and this one wants to indulge in bull**** games over the death of a pilot! Original Mx is a sophmoric jerk, but the imposter is an insensitive asshole. Who ever it is should have the fleas of a thousand camels infest his crotch, followed up with fireants. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dudley and anyone else,
I was listening with my scanner and heard the P-51A call "Precious Metal, one mile final", but no further radio calls. I glanced to the south and saw the P-51A, but not the D, still a good ways out. I then focused on watching the Sea Fury and Tigercat rolling out until I heard the crowd gasp at which point I looked south and saw the P-51A pitch up and roll inverted and the P-51D pitch over on its nose. From the video it seems to me that they weren't necessarily landing as a section or in formation, that it's possible that the P-51D cut into the pattern and Beck in the P-51A never saw the P-51D until too late. The video begins showing the P-51A higher and hotter and well behind the D, and it seems to me that right at the start of the video there was pretty good separation between the two which the P-51A closed quickly. Is it possible in your experience and knowing the visibility over the nose of a Mustang that Beck in the P-51A didn't see the P-51D, and never knew he was there until too late, and that Odegaard maybe turned in front of him in the pattern? I'd love to see a video showing them from further out in the approach, but I'm interested in your opinion. Scott Wilson |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I believe I made it clear in an earlier post in this thread that close
in staggered section landings with co-speed touchdowns are fairly common in nose wheel aircraft like the F15. It's only in tail wheel fighters like the Mustang where close in section landings are an issue. Dudley Henriques Bush wrote: We do this daily at FMH in F-15's. Have a great one! Bush "They'll let anyone fly 'em" John Travolta On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 20:47:20 -0400, Dudley Henriques wrote: Dudley Henriques wrote: The one thing you don't want to lose sight of with all this John is that the recommendation considered standard for civilians flying Mustangs as that advice would relate to a section landing gives MUCH more longitudinal separation room required between the landing P51's....as much as 3000 feet actually then was the case at Oshkosh. Even with a high degree of experience, a civilian landing a P51 would be well advised by any of the powers that be, not to mention myself, to adhere to this long separation when landing 2 P51's out of a formation pattern. Usually this would be done from a 360 overhead with spacing on the pitch out to allow for this 3000 foot minimum longitudinal separation on the active runway. Dudley Henriques ..addendum; I would only add to this that as far as I am aware, section landings as the military has used them in the past, with 2 aircraft landing staggered on each side of the runway with CLOSE IN SPACING, is NOT...and I repeat...NOT a recommended procedure by any standard I know of in present use by associations and organizations dealing with formation flight safety with direct relationship to the P51 Mustang. Dudley Henriques |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We do this daily at FMH in F-15's.
Have a great one! Bush "They'll let anyone fly 'em" John Travolta On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 20:47:20 -0400, Dudley Henriques wrote: Dudley Henriques wrote: The one thing you don't want to lose sight of with all this John is that the recommendation considered standard for civilians flying Mustangs as that advice would relate to a section landing gives MUCH more longitudinal separation room required between the landing P51's....as much as 3000 feet actually then was the case at Oshkosh. Even with a high degree of experience, a civilian landing a P51 would be well advised by any of the powers that be, not to mention myself, to adhere to this long separation when landing 2 P51's out of a formation pattern. Usually this would be done from a 360 overhead with spacing on the pitch out to allow for this 3000 foot minimum longitudinal separation on the active runway. Dudley Henriques ..addendum; I would only add to this that as far as I am aware, section landings as the military has used them in the past, with 2 aircraft landing staggered on each side of the runway with CLOSE IN SPACING, is NOT...and I repeat...NOT a recommended procedure by any standard I know of in present use by associations and organizations dealing with formation flight safety with direct relationship to the P51 Mustang. Dudley Henriques |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bush wrote:
We do this daily at FMH in F-15's. I flew an F-15 yesterday. It's fun, although the g-forces really do wear you out after awhile. I had a flameout, could not get my engines restarted, and had to do a deadstick landing onto a 1500 ft grass strip runway from 50 miles away. My seat was really wet after that maneuver. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Big John wrote:
Mxsmanic Where did you fly the 51? What AAC organization and theater? The real mxsmanic didn't make that post. Check the headers and you see: Organization: Trolls, Inc. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 03:26:56 -0000, Jim Logajan
wrote: The real mxsmanic didn't make that post. Check the headers and you see: Organization: Trolls, Inc. So, Anthony now believes in truth in advertising? snicker Trolls trolling for trolls? I'm glad I killfiled him soon after he showed up in this group... |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
[ Elided in the name of good taste. ] Organization: Trolls, Inc. You do realize that all you are accomplishing is to prove many of mxsmanic's detractors are infantile and have thin skins? |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 27, 6:41 pm, "Gattman" wrote:
http://www.wfrv.com/news/local/story...5fd653-6d41-46... OSHKOSH (AP) - The Federal Aviation Administration says one pilot is confirmed dead today after two planes collided while landing at EAA's AirVenture. The FAA says the accident with the two P-51 Mustangs happened at shortly after 3pm, after the planes finished a performance at the Experimental Aircraft Association's show. Investigators with the FAA and the National Transportation Safety Board are investigating. The last fatal crash at EAA Airventure happened last year on July 23. A Washington state couple was killed when their single engine, home-built plane crashed on approach at Whittman Regional Airport. I was a fighter pilot for the Air Force for several years and hated formation landings more than anything else I ever did. No room for error. Danny Deger |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Today in Oshkosh [9/9] - "09 Another Mustang (wasn't this Dazzling Donna).JPG" yEnc (1/1) | Just Plane Noise[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 4 | July 28th 07 11:09 PM |
Today in Oshkosh [7/9] - "07 Reno Mustang.jpg" yEnc (1/1) | Just Plane Noise[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | July 27th 07 01:49 AM |
Today at Oshkosh [26/34] - "25 Eagle shadows Mustang (Heritage flight).JPG" yEnc (1/1) | Just Plane Noise | Aviation Photos | 0 | July 25th 07 04:32 AM |
Post-accident photos of RV/TBM Avenger Oshkosh taxi collision | Jim Logajan | Piloting | 39 | August 28th 06 03:49 PM |
Post-accident photos of RV/TBM Avenger Oshkosh taxi collision | Jim Logajan | Home Built | 49 | August 28th 06 03:49 PM |