A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Raise your useful load without an STC...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old August 3rd 07, 05:11 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 684
Default Raise your useful load without an STC...

On Aug 2, 1:34 am, "Hilton" wrote:
1. Go on a diet
2. Define a gallon of 100LL as weighing 5.82 lbs instead of the usual 6
lbs - Mooney did it.

Is this legal/valid? If so, why don't all manufacturers do it?

Hilton


At Oshkosh a few pilots complained that our LED landing light was too
heavy at 0.9 lbs, which I thought was a bit silly considering that
halogen lights of the same function weigh that much and don't put out
as much light and take more power. At the same time I was thinking to
myself "and if you were to lose a few pounds it wouldn't really matter
anyway" but found myself biting my tongue instead... :-p

Your message is so true, and I for one could dramatically increase the
useful load by losing 10, 20, or even 30 pounds! That's a lot more
significant than any fuel weight rounding.

Dean
AeroLEDs LLC
www.aeroleds.com

  #12  
Old August 3rd 07, 06:04 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Aluckyguess
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 276
Default Raise your useful load without an STC...


wrote in message
ups.com...
On Aug 2, 1:34 am, "Hilton" wrote:
1. Go on a diet
2. Define a gallon of 100LL as weighing 5.82 lbs instead of the usual 6
lbs - Mooney did it.

Is this legal/valid? If so, why don't all manufacturers do it?

Hilton


At Oshkosh a few pilots complained that our LED landing light was too
heavy at 0.9 lbs, which I thought was a bit silly considering that
halogen lights of the same function weigh that much and don't put out
as much light and take more power. At the same time I was thinking to
myself "and if you were to lose a few pounds it wouldn't really matter
anyway" but found myself biting my tongue instead... :-p

Your message is so true, and I for one could dramatically increase the
useful load by losing 10, 20, or even 30 pounds! That's a lot more
significant than any fuel weight rounding.


I could loose 30 myself.

Dean
AeroLEDs LLC
www.aeroleds.com



  #13  
Old August 3rd 07, 09:22 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Hilton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 118
Default Raise your useful load without an STC...

Dean,

Your message is so true, and I for one could dramatically increase the
useful load by losing 10, 20, or even 30 pounds! That's a lot more
significant than any fuel weight rounding.


A year or two ago, I challenged a friend of mine (my 'flying buddy') to a
diet. Within a few months, we had increased our useful 'useful load' by 50
pounds! That's almost like changing the 160hp to a 180hp plus the added
health benefits for free.

Hilton


  #14  
Old August 5th 07, 02:15 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Montblack
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 972
Default Raise your useful load without an STC...

("Aluckyguess" wrote)
I could loose 30 myself.



Black went on a diet and shed 300 lbs!


Mont :-)


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Server over-load Jim Macklin Instrument Flight Rules 6 August 17th 06 01:48 AM
New 182T, where's the useful load?? Robert M. Gary Piloting 10 April 27th 06 06:48 PM
Bush went to war to raise oil prices. Garamondextended Military Aviation 6 May 29th 04 02:24 AM
Load supervisers jfp Piloting 0 April 13th 04 04:25 PM
Load supervisers jfp General Aviation 0 April 13th 04 04:22 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.