Comair Accident pilot sues...

Wow, you guys take this stuff pretty seriously. Its just legal
manuervering.

"Ron Lee" wrote in message
...

Who does he expect to fool? If this goes to trial the jury should be
full of pilots (mostly GA types).


Anyone with any aviation background will be excluded from the jury. Bias.

He departed on a runway without runway lights in violation of
his company opspecs requiring lights (which have the wait of
FARs) and he blames the manufacturer of the lights?

In article .com,
"Robert M. Gary" wrote:
Wow, you guys take this stuff pretty seriously. Its just legal
manuervering.

Maybe, but the costs for "legal maneuvering" come out of our pockets.



JKG

("Robert M. Gary" wrote)
Wow, you guys take this stuff pretty seriously. Its just legal
manuervering.


Much like a lawyer "falling" off a bridge...


Paul-Mont :-))))))) & )))))))

Jonathan Goodish wrote:
In article .com,
"Robert M. Gary" wrote:
Wow, you guys take this stuff pretty seriously. Its just legal
manuervering.

Maybe, but the costs for "legal maneuvering" come out of our pockets.



JKG

So, how much do you think YOU are goinf to save if the FO doesn't do what he
needs to do to defend himself?

"Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in message
...

So, how much do you think YOU are goinf to save if the FO doesn't do what
he needs to do to defend himself?

What has the FO been charged with?

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in message
...

So, how much do you think YOU are goinf to save if the FO doesn't do
what he needs to do to defend himself?

What has the FO been charged with?

....defend himself from the possible civil claims against him.

What it boils down to is which insurance company is going to pay what.

"Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in message
...

...defend himself from the possible civil claims against him.


Those would be valid claims, his suit is not.

In article ,
"Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote:
So, how much do you think YOU are goinf to save if the FO doesn't do
what he needs to do to defend himself?

What has the FO been charged with?

...defend himself from the possible civil claims against him.

What it boils down to is which insurance company is going to pay what.


It seems that if he's responsible, the claims against him are valid. He
should accept responsibility and not try to shift blame onto someone
else. Keep in mind that companies don't pay for anything, every dollar
a company spends comes out of YOUR pocket.




JKG