A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

UAV Crash in Arizona (Long)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old October 21st 07, 02:50 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 790
Default UAV Crash in Arizona (Long)

"Steve Davis" wrote in message
...
...
I used to have those kinds of thoughts. When I got
30 miles north of
Roswell I took off the foil hat and they went away.

...


http://people.csail.mit.edu/rahimi/helmet/

--
Geoff
The Sea Hawk at Wow Way d0t Com
remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply by mail
When immigration is outlawed, only outlaws will immigrate.


  #22  
Old October 21st 07, 03:51 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
shawn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9
Default UAV Crash in Arizona (Long)

Steve Davis wrote:

snip

Also, get rid of your illegal alien indentured servants
and hire American
employees.

Yeah, leave the hiring of illegal immigrants to American
corporations
where they belong!


http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/local/article/
0,1299,DRMN_15_5720596,00.html

Cut and paste both lines. Its an article about a defense
contractor which
recently got raided by ICE and the DCIS.



Three miles from my house, that caught my attention. The VP of R&D is
from China. Just speculating, but perhaps the gubument started getting
nervous about him, or the Korean CEO?

A little more info:
http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drm...723600,00.html


Shawn
  #23  
Old October 21st 07, 10:43 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default UAV Crash in Arizona (Long)

On Oct 19, 10:47 pm, Mike the Strike wrote:

snip

Because it had no airworthiness certificate - we don't let real people
(even the more expendable military) fly in those. If the
airworthiness couldn't be guaranteed, we wouldn't normally let an
aircraft fly.

snip

Lets think about this. No approved type certicate, does this sound
familar? We should go to the FAA and demand all aircraft that lack
approved type certificates be grounded because they are obviously
unsafe. How many sailplanes fly under experimental certificates?
Lots. Homebuilts of course and quite a few Libelles, discuses and
LS-3s since the original owners imported them before they received
approval from the FAA. I imagine if the experimental certificates
were cancelled you could eventually get an approved type certificate
after some paperwork and maybe retrofitting some equipment required by
the ATC. Of course some of the open class ship would be out of luck
since they never received an ATC as well as others. Wouldn't it be
better to figure out what safety issues the Predator has,if any, and
campaign to have them fixed?


  #24  
Old October 21st 07, 11:36 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Marc Ramsey[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 211
Default UAV Crash in Arizona (Long)

wrote:
Lets think about this. No approved type certicate, does this sound
familar? We should go to the FAA and demand all aircraft that lack
approved type certificates be grounded because they are obviously
unsafe. How many sailplanes fly under experimental certificates?
Lots. Homebuilts of course and quite a few Libelles, discuses and
LS-3s since the original owners imported them before they received
approval from the FAA. I imagine if the experimental certificates
were cancelled you could eventually get an approved type certificate
after some paperwork and maybe retrofitting some equipment required by
the ATC. Of course some of the open class ship would be out of luck
since they never received an ATC as well as others. Wouldn't it be
better to figure out what safety issues the Predator has,if any, and
campaign to have them fixed?


According to the NTSB report, the Predator had no airworthiness
certificate whatsoever and was flying on an FAA waiver. All of the
gliders discussed above fly with special airworthiness certificates.
The situations are simply not comparable.

Several smaller companies are having a great deal of difficulty getting
public use (law enforcement, search and rescue, etc.) airworthiness
certificates for UAVs which are in many cases no larger than your
typical model airplane. The DHS and a large defense contractor can
simply invoke "national security", which allows them to get away with
behavior that would be quite illegal for anyone else...

Marc



  #25  
Old October 22nd 07, 12:49 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Andy[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,565
Default UAV Crash in Arizona (Long)

On Oct 21, 4:03 am, "
wrote:
Roll on Terminator 2 & Skynet!


What Skynet? I worked on Skynet 4 over 20 years ago!

Andy

  #26  
Old October 22nd 07, 01:19 PM
bagmaker bagmaker is offline
Senior Member
 
First recorded activity by AviationBanter: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 167
Default

And what recourse would our loved ones have against the "pilots" employed by these "defence contractors" in the name of "national security" when their glorified model aircraft has a mid-air with one of us, a GA pilot or some long-hair skidding about in his para-glider? (sorry long-hairs)
No doubt the spinners would have us in government airspace, (bull) too high or low (crap) over or near some newly invented anti-terrorist establishment. (yeah, right, how remotely desert was this housing estate?)

This is all rubbish, folks, and we need to let people know, as aviators, that the reasons do not add up to the perceived threats.

Can anyone here imagine a motorised vehicle on the freeways being sold to us in a similar way? Would that be acceptable?

No. And duh!

Get the hell out of my sky, I can't trust someone I can't sue.

Bagger
  #27  
Old October 22nd 07, 10:31 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Steve Davis
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 36
Default UAV Crash in Arizona (Long)

Three miles from my house, that caught my attention.
The VP of R&D
is from China. Just speculating, but perhaps the gubument
started
getting nervous about him, or the Korean CEO?


No, the Clinton administration railroaded Wen Ho Lee
to deflect
public concern from the fact that they had been allowing
a large
amount of aircraft, missile and perhaps nuclear technology
transfers
to China. After that episode, the Asian community is
very sensitive to
the possibility of knee-jerk profiling and scapegoating
by the
government. A very large percentage of engineers in
American
industry are Asian and the Wen Ho Lee episode really
pi**ed them
off. It is 'possible' however that a company which
does a lot
of very tiny, precise and tedious assembly and adhesive
work could
find that bringing a group of women over from China,
keeping them
cloistered, and shipping back any who complained about
the conditions
worked better than hiring Americans to do that work.
If a defense
contractor did this it would be a matter for both ICE
and the DCIS to
investigate.

A little more info:
http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/local/article/

0,1299,DRMN_15_5723600,00.html
Shawn




  #28  
Old October 23rd 07, 04:23 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default UAV Crash in Arizona (Long)

can
simply invoke "national security", which allows them to get away with
behavior that would be quite illegal for anyone else...

Marc


I think I have heard of this being done.

Steve
A loyal American

  #29  
Old October 27th 07, 10:02 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
J a c k[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 53
Default UAV Crash in Arizona (Long)

Steve Davis wrote:


Since U.S. airspace is owned by the American people I vote for
increased usage of Predators and other UAV's along our borders and suggest
you keep your sailplane away from them.


Sure thing, Stevie. Just let us know where these devices are. Make them
electronically, visually, or procedurally visible and/or predictable and
we will be able to avoid them. Or make the drug/alien "war" real by
deploying troops where they would do some good.



Also, get rid of your illegal alien indentured servants
and hire American employees.


Are you applying for a landscaping, roofing, paving, or domestic service
job?



Jack


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Expo, meeting JayB, getting stuck in Lancaster on the way home,fulfilling the commercial certificate long solo x-c...long Jack Allison Piloting 6 November 19th 06 02:31 AM
Another Long Cross Country: HPN to PAO in 6 Days (long) Journeyman Piloting 19 June 15th 06 11:47 PM
Long Island Crash - Kite String? Neb Okla Rotorcraft 5 September 3rd 04 05:43 PM
FFZ - Arizona Ardna Piloting 0 December 23rd 03 07:14 AM
Aircraft crash - Arizona - Information required John Piloting 0 November 16th 03 09:37 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.