A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Bad Week for Airbus



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old November 27th 07, 06:40 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Friedrich Ostertag
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 41
Default Bad Week for Airbus

Judah wrote:
Admittedly, this doesn't eradicate the message (in fact it rather
elucidats it). I was on a flight once where the announcement went
something like, "If anyone has not existed on this planet for the
last 100 years and doesn't know how to buckle and unbuckle their
seatbelt, please raise your hand."


:-)

As of making fun of the safety issues, I'm all for it, as it will make ist
stick more.

regards,
Friedrich


  #82  
Old November 27th 07, 06:41 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bertie the Bunyip[_19_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,851
Default Bad Week for Airbus

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Tina writes:

I think people die from explosive decompresssion because they don't
get oxygen, not from the bends.


Explosive decompression is very rare (and very different from rapid
decompression), but when it occurs, many deaths occur due to direct
physical trauma from differences in air pressure. Ruptured hearts and
lungs are not unusual. This was seen in the early accidents with the
Comet, which actually did explosively decompress on several occasions
when defects in its construction yielded at altitude.




Wrong again, moron.



Bertie


  #83  
Old November 27th 07, 06:41 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bertie the Bunyip[_19_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,851
Default Bad Week for Airbus

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

george writes:

Going from a short exposure of low pressure to a longer period of
exposure to a higher presure will have no effect on soluble gases in
the bloos stream.


It will, however, add a bit more gas in solution to the blood and body
tissues.


nope

Bertie
  #84  
Old November 27th 07, 06:42 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bertie the Bunyip[_19_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,851
Default Bad Week for Airbus

Mxsmanic wrote in
news
Peter Clark writes:

"And if you're flying with more than one child, please pick which one
you love more now."


Why would you have to do that? If you put your mask on first, the
children will all survive.



what children You'll neve rhave children and you will never fly.



Bertie
  #85  
Old November 27th 07, 04:00 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Tina
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 500
Default Bad Week for Airbus

Sorry, Bertie: exposure to higher ambient pressures does in fact drive
gasses into solution in our blood and tissue. See Strong's Physical
Chemistry text (God, I'm dating myself -- that might have been
published in the 60s!).



Sco Bertie 2,531 Mx 1


On Nov 27, 1:41 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Mxsmanic wrote :



Going from a short exposure of low pressure to a longer period of
exposure to a higher presure will have no effect on soluble gases in
the bloos stream.


It will, however, add a bit more gas in solution to the blood and body
tissues.


nope

Bertie


  #86  
Old November 27th 07, 04:32 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bertie the Bunyip[_19_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,851
Default Bad Week for Airbus

Tina wrote in
:

Sorry, Bertie: exposure to higher ambient pressures does in fact drive
gasses into solution in our blood and tissue. See Strong's Physical
Chemistry text (God, I'm dating myself -- that might have been
published in the 60s!).



I know, we had to do that in piloty school

He's still worng.


Bertie


Sco Bertie 2,531 Mx 1


On Nov 27, 1:41 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Mxsmanic wrote
:



Going from a short exposure of low pressure to a longer period of
exposure to a higher presure will have no effect on soluble gases
in the bloos stream.


It will, however, add a bit more gas in solution to the blood and
body tissues.


nope

Bertie




  #87  
Old November 27th 07, 07:44 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
george
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 803
Default Bad Week for Airbus

On Nov 27, 7:27 pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
Tina writes:
I think people die from explosive decompresssion because they don't get
oxygen, not from the bends.


Explosive decompression is very rare (and very different from rapid
decompression), but when it occurs, many deaths occur due to direct physical
trauma from differences in air pressure. Ruptured hearts and lungs are not
unusual. This was seen in the early accidents with the Comet, which actually
did explosively decompress on several occasions when defects in its
construction yielded at altitude.


Jeez. Mixedup does it again.

FYI The Comets broke up through metal fatigue because of a faulty
square window/hatch design.
The explosive decompression was accompanied with a sudden stop at sea
level
This proved fatal
  #88  
Old November 27th 07, 10:55 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Tina
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 500
Default Bad Week for Airbus

I understand mx being wrong even when he happens to be correct. It's
the principle of the thing.


I will retract and correct the scoring, based on that.

On Nov 27, 11:32 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Tina wrote :

Sorry, Bertie: exposure to higher ambient pressures does in fact drive
gasses into solution in our blood and tissue. See Strong's Physical
Chemistry text (God, I'm dating myself -- that might have been
published in the 60s!).


I know, we had to do that in piloty school

He's still worng.

Bertie





Sco Bertie 2,531 Mx 1


On Nov 27, 1:41 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Mxsmanic wrote
:


Going from a short exposure of low pressure to a longer period of
exposure to a higher presure will have no effect on soluble gases
in the bloos stream.


It will, however, add a bit more gas in solution to the blood and
body tissues.


nope


Bertie- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


  #89  
Old November 28th 07, 06:53 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Bad Week for Airbus

george writes:

FYI The Comets broke up through metal fatigue because of a faulty
square window/hatch design.


That's what I said.
  #90  
Old November 28th 07, 07:18 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
WJRFlyBoy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 531
Default Bad Week for Airbus

On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 08:00:25 -0800 (PST), Tina wrote:

Sorry, Bertie: exposure to higher ambient pressures does in fact drive
gasses into solution in our blood and tissue. See Strong's Physical
Chemistry text (God, I'm dating myself -- that might have been
published in the 60s!).


Jeez, I still have the text on my shelf
--
Remove numbers for gmail and for God's sake it ain't "gee" either!
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
airbus - Latest Plane From Airbus.jpg [email protected] Aviation Photos 14 June 26th 07 09:41 AM
Which is easier: Boeing to Airbus, or Airbus to Boeing? Mxsmanic Piloting 9 February 21st 07 01:58 AM
What a week.. Capt.Doug Piloting 11 February 20th 07 03:25 AM
No NYC Fleet Week TFR? Marco Leon Piloting 8 June 1st 06 10:59 PM
This week DHeitm8612 General Aviation 0 January 21st 05 01:19 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.