Let's get high.

george wrote in
:

On Dec 6, 2:44 am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Mxsmanic wrote
:

writes:

That's because your depth of knowledge only extends to a brief
skimming of wikipedia articles and playing flight simulator.

No, it's because I know what the technology can actually do.

No, you don't.

Whoa. Stop.
Set park brake.
Mixed up mistrusts automated systems to a point where he would be
unhappy to use such systems.
In his bedroom on his computor.
Riiight







Missed that... 'Course i don't spend a whole lot of time reading his ****.

Bertie

george wrote:


VAX any-one ?

VAX machines were from the 70s, and pretty stable for their day (compared
the the earlier PDP series). I was thinking more along the lines of the
UNIVAC 1108 and the IBM System/360.

John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180)

--
Message posted via http://www.aviationkb.com

"Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote

That was a big hole in the whole money isn't an issue in the Federation
thing. There sure were a lot of Star Fleet officers betting at Quark's bar
and then there was the weekly poker game on the Enterprise.

Many people thought that DS 9 was a hole in the whole Star Trek family of
shows. I would have to agree, on the most part.

As far as the poker game on the Enterprise, that was just for chips; no
money involved, right? g
--
Jim in NC