![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 10:30:47 -0800 (PST), "F. Baum"
wrote in : On Dec 22, 11:10*am, Larry Dighera wrote: The air carriers benefit. *The FAA contractors (Boeing, LockMart, ITT,...) benefit. *There might be some benefit for ATC. *But as proposed in the NPRM, it is GA that has to spend a _LOT_ of cash to make it happen, and I am unable to find any significant benefit for GA. Lar, your first post said that air carriers are going to be exempt and now you say they will benefit ? The airliners are already equipped with Mode S transponders and certified GPS receivers. The cost of installation of an ADS-B box is a VERY SMALL percentage of the value of the aircraft, unlike light GA where the ADS-B installation might comprise 50% of the value of the aircraft. Actually, I would hope the air carriers benefit because if they benefit, we all benefit. * I'm still waiting for you to list the benefits to GA aircraft owners that the FAA's ADS-B NPRM will provide. If you are unable to list them, I'll have to conclude that you agree that there are none. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"F. Baum" wrote:
On Dec 22, 10:22=A0am, Larry Dighera wrote: I wonder why AOPA has not come out against this NPRM like they did the border crossing rule and user fees. =A0This NPRM is worse than both of those. I suppose AOPA is choosing their battles. =A0 I think the fact that AOPA is not fighting this is your first clue. ADS is going to be a tremendous benefit for everyone. F Baum Have you read the NPRM? I have and see ZERO benefit to me. Ron Lee |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"F. Baum" wrote:
On Dec 22, 10:22=A0am, Larry Dighera wrote: I wonder why AOPA has not come out against this NPRM like they did the border crossing rule and user fees. =A0This NPRM is worse than both of those. I suppose AOPA is choosing their battles. =A0 I think the fact that AOPA is not fighting this is your first clue. ADS is going to be a tremendous benefit for everyone. F Baum Are you a pilot? Do you own a GA aircraft? Have you read the NPRM? Can you provide reasonable proof where I benefit (GA Pilot and aircraft owner)? If you read my treatise on this NPRM I refute the notion that it is a safety benefit, that the increased accuracy is of any real world value or that it offers me ANY benefit for the potential huge cost (TBD but in the $9000 - $17000 range). http://home.pcisys.net/~ronlee/Reply...S-BOutNPRM.doc Even the notion that it will benefit airlines is questionable. Ron Lee |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 22, 12:12*pm, Larry Dighera wrote:
I'm still waiting for you to list the benefits to GA aircraft owners that the FAA's ADS-B NPRM will provide. *If you are unable to list them, I'll have to conclude that you agree that there are none. Yea, you are right. Lets not modernize our airspace. If you take a look at the NPRM and the FAA material on Next Gen you will see that it benefits GA much more than the airlines. I dont know who you fly for, but the airlines already have many of the Next Gen procedures are in place. I dont mean to be sarcastic Larry, but when you fly an RNAV or RNP procedure do you long for the good old days of vectors and holding patterns ? ![]() FB |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 22, 2:49*pm, (Ron Lee) wrote:
Are you a pilot? Ive slipped them surly bonds a time or two. Do you own a GA aircraft? Ive biult three and I currently own two. Have you read the NPRM? The parts that didnt make my head hurt. Can you provide reasonable proof where I benefit (GA Pilot and aircraft owner)? You'll get to keep flying, thats a benefit. If you read my treatise on this NPRM I refute the notion that it is a safety benefit, that the increased accuracy is of any real world value or that it offers me ANY benefit for the potential huge cost (TBD but in the $9000 - $17000 range). Couldnt pull it up. Even the notion that it will benefit airlines is questionable. ???????? who do you fly for. Ron Lee |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"F. Baum" wrote:
On Dec 22, 12:12=A0pm, Larry Dighera wrote: I'm still waiting for you to list the benefits to GA aircraft owners that the FAA's ADS-B NPRM will provide. =A0If you are unable to list them, I'll have to conclude that you agree that there are none. Yea, you are right. Lets not modernize our airspace. If you take a look at the NPRM and the FAA material on Next Gen you will see that it benefits GA much more than the airlines. I dont know who you fly for, but the airlines already have many of the Next Gen procedures are in place. I dont mean to be sarcastic Larry, but when you fly an RNAV or RNP procedure do you long for the good old days of vectors and holding patterns ? ![]() FB FB, you have not shown the benefit to me...a GA pilot. Have you read the NPRM? Are you a GA pilot? Do you own a GA aircraft? Ron Lee |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"F. Baum" wrote:
On Dec 22, 12:12=A0pm, Larry Dighera wrote: I'm still waiting for you to list the benefits to GA aircraft owners that the FAA's ADS-B NPRM will provide. =A0If you are unable to list them, I'll have to conclude that you agree that there are none. Yea, you are right. Lets not modernize our airspace. If you take a look at the NPRM and the FAA material on Next Gen you will see that it benefits GA much more than the airlines. I dont know who you fly for, but the airlines already have many of the Next Gen procedures are in place. I dont mean to be sarcastic Larry, but when you fly an RNAV or RNP procedure do you long for the good old days of vectors and holding patterns ? ![]() FB More questions FB. Do you work for the FAA as a government employee, consultant or supporting contractor? Do you work for any company that will benefit from producing equipment or otherwise providing ADS-B and/or Next Gen services? Ron Lee |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"F. Baum" wrote:
Can you provide reasonable proof where I benefit (GA Pilot and aircraft owner)? You'll get to keep flying, thats a benefit. Great. We can only keep flying in the greatest aviation country in the world if we roll over and meekly accept this idiotic NPRM. Please do not ever get into a policy making position that would impact me. If you read my treatise on this NPRM I refute the notion that it is a safety benefit, that the increased accuracy is of any real world value or that it offers me ANY benefit for the potential huge cost (TBD but in the $9000 - $17000 range). Couldnt pull it up. Page 56967 of the NPRM: " On the low end, the dollar value may represent a software upgrade or OEM option change. On the high end, the dollar value may represent a new installation of upgraded transponder systems necessary to assure accuracy, reliability and safety." I interpreted this to mean that their range of costs of $4,328 to $17,283 as shown on page 56963. I got the ballpark $9000 from a cost of a Garmin ADS-B unit Even the notion that it will benefit airlines is questionable. ???????? who do you fly for. I read the NPRM and their supposed cost benefit documentation. I don't fly for an airline but I can look at cost-benefit info and make reasonable interpretations of their validity (in some cases). Read my submittal on this NPRM and the entire NPRM. Ron Lee |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
Are you aware that the FAA's intent is to decommission most of their radar once ADS-B is operational? ADS-B relies upon aircraft equipped GPS receivers; radar relies on the physical reflection of radio waves bouncing off of tangible objects. Which would you prefer to bet your life on? I'm not passing judgement on the ADS-B question, but relying on radar around the DC area can get you in trouble (if not killed). Radar plots can be as much as a mile off actual location, so I'm not convinced it's a superior alternative to satellite tech (like GPS) despite the occasional solar interference. -- John T http://sage1solutions.com/blogs/TknoFlyer http://sage1solutions.com/products NEW! FlyteBalance v2.0 (W&B); FlyteLog v2.0 (Logbook) ____________________ |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
Agreed. But at least the DNC, unlike the RNC, lacks the hubris to burglarize the opposition's election headquarters, or worse: Not a fact in evidence. It just means they haven't been caught. Further, the only evidence of RNC misbehavior you showed was 30+ years old. Hardly earth-shaking. -- John T http://sage1solutions.com/blogs/TknoFlyer http://sage1solutions.com/products NEW! FlyteBalance v2.0 (W&B); FlyteLog v2.0 (Logbook) ____________________ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FAA ADS-B Propaganda Video | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 1 | December 23rd 07 03:05 PM |
AOPA Propaganda, cont. | Skylune | Piloting | 65 | December 15th 05 01:42 AM |
AOPA propaganda | Skylune | Piloting | 28 | October 31st 05 05:43 PM |
Not Particularly Impressed with Tuskegee Airmen Propaganda. | The Enlightenment | Military Aviation | 25 | July 11th 03 09:01 PM |