![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is my first trip into the homebuilt world. I'm probably going to
buy a 90% complete project, and want to know if there will be any paperwork hassles I'll have to jump through to get it registered. I realize I won't have the repair authorization as I did not build 51% of the plane, but what should I look for as far as documentation from the current owner and what will the FAA expect to see from me? I have AC 20-27F, but during a very quick glance-through I didn't notice any specific mentions. Any help appreciated! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JAX wrote:
This is my first trip into the homebuilt world. I'm probably going to buy a 90% complete project, and want to know if there will be any paperwork hassles I'll have to jump through to get it registered. Get a tall stack of detail photos for documentation. I realize I won't have the repair authorization as I did not build 51% of the plane, but what should I look for as far as documentation from the current owner and what will the FAA expect to see from me? Apply for the repairman's certificate when it comes time to do all the paperwork. The so-called 51% rule does not apply there. I have AC 20-27F, but during a very quick glance-through I didn't notice any specific mentions. Any help appreciated! Study it in detail. Have fun! Richard |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
cavelamb himself wrote:
JAX wrote: This is my first trip into the homebuilt world. I'm probably going to buy a 90% complete project, and want to know if there will be any paperwork hassles I'll have to jump through to get it registered. Get a tall stack of detail photos for documentation. I realize I won't have the repair authorization as I did not build 51% of the plane, but what should I look for as far as documentation from the current owner and what will the FAA expect to see from me? Apply for the repairman's certificate when it comes time to do all the paperwork. The so-called 51% rule does not apply there. I have AC 20-27F, but during a very quick glance-through I didn't notice any specific mentions. Any help appreciated! Study it in detail. Have fun! Richard You will have to convince the examiner/DAR/whatever--that the First builder did it under "experimental" rules Get all the documentation you can get from the first builder that you can--photos showing him working on it, notarized statement would be helpful--maybe even his telephone # if that stays available.. Jerry |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JAX wrote:
This is my first trip into the homebuilt world. I'm probably going to buy a 90% complete project, and want to know if there will be any paperwork hassles I'll have to jump through to get it registered. I realize I won't have the repair authorization as I did not build 51% of the plane, but what should I look for as far as documentation from the current owner and what will the FAA expect to see from me? I have AC 20-27F, but during a very quick glance-through I didn't notice any specific mentions. Any help appreciated! If the project you get is 90% done, there will in all likely hood still be 51% left for you to do. Both technically and in reality. Study the checklists carefully. Charles |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "JAX" wrote in message ... This is my first trip into the homebuilt world. I'm probably going to buy a 90% complete project, and want to know if there will be any paperwork hassles I'll have to jump through to get it registered. I realize I won't have the repair authorization as I did not build 51% of the plane, but what should I look for as far as documentation from the current owner and what will the FAA expect to see from me? I have AC 20-27F, but during a very quick glance-through I didn't notice any specific mentions. Any help appreciated! Any of the builders who worked on the aircraft can get the repairman's certificate. The key is that you need to be able to demonstrate that 51% of the airplane was amateur built. KB |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Charles Vincent" wrote in message ... JAX wrote: This is my first trip into the homebuilt world. I'm probably going to buy a 90% complete project, and want to know if there will be any paperwork hassles I'll have to jump through to get it registered. I realize I won't have the repair authorization as I did not build 51% of the plane, but what should I look for as far as documentation from the current owner and what will the FAA expect to see from me? I have AC 20-27F, but during a very quick glance-through I didn't notice any specific mentions. Any help appreciated! If the project you get is 90% done, there will in all likely hood still be 51% left for you to do. Both technically and in reality. Study the checklists carefully. Charles So true. 90% of the work is usuually the last 10% of the project. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 17:04:29 -0500, "Kyle Boatright"
wrote: "JAX" wrote in message ... This is my first trip into the homebuilt world. I'm probably going to buy a 90% complete project, and want to know if there will be any paperwork hassles I'll have to jump through to get it registered. I realize I won't have the repair authorization as I did not build 51% of the plane, but what should I look for as far as documentation from the current owner and what will the FAA expect to see from me? I have AC 20-27F, but during a very quick glance-through I didn't notice any specific mentions. Any help appreciated! Any of the builders who worked on the aircraft can get the repairman's certificate. The key is that you need to be able to demonstrate that 51% of the airplane was amateur built. Technically only the "majority" builder is supposed to get the certificate, but unless the project is practically turnkey, the OP shouldn't have a problem. I've known a couple of folks who have received the certificate on projects that were practically structurally complete when they bought them. The systems work is probably much more important.... Ron Wanttaja |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Greta stuff guys, thanks! Keep it coming, the advice is much
appreciated... On Jan 5, 6:07 pm, Ron Wanttaja wrote: On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 17:04:29 -0500, "Kyle Boatright" wrote: "JAX" wrote in message ... This is my first trip into the homebuilt world. I'm probably going to buy a 90% complete project, and want to know if there will be any paperwork hassles I'll have to jump through to get it registered. I realize I won't have the repair authorization as I did not build 51% of the plane, but what should I look for as far as documentation from the current owner and what will the FAA expect to see from me? I have AC 20-27F, but during a very quick glance-through I didn't notice any specific mentions. Any help appreciated! Any of the builders who worked on the aircraft can get the repairman's certificate. The key is that you need to be able to demonstrate that 51% of the airplane was amateur built. Technically only the "majority" builder is supposed to get the certificate, but unless the project is practically turnkey, the OP shouldn't have a problem. I've known a couple of folks who have received the certificate on projects that were practically structurally complete when they bought them. The systems work is probably much more important.... Ron Wanttaja |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kyle Boatright wrote:
The key is that you need to be able to demonstrate that 51% of the airplane was amateur built. KB Last I read it was 51% of the TASKS of building the plane. ergo.. if a plane has 100 ribs in the wing, if you build ONE rib, you have accomplished the task of building wing ribs and do not have to build all 100 of them.. or 51 of them... thats where the quickbuilds tread the line.. Interesting to note that the nonprimary builder can get the repairmans cert. I knew that only one person COULD have it, but presumed it was the one who did the majority of the building. Dave |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
. *The systems work
is probably much more important.... Ron Wanttaja- Hide quoted text - Judging by the preponderance of fuel starvation problems in experimentals in the NTSB database that sounds absolutely right. It seems like fuel delivery problems account for half of all experimental accidents and off airport landings. The other half seems like pilot error in one form or another (which is par for the flying course). In the designs I've looked at, not a single structural failure occured that wasn't pilot caused, and there was only one of those and the pilot was high on mary jane. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
buying help | John Doe | Owning | 21 | August 17th 05 07:08 PM |
Considering buying a share | Paul Tomblin | Owning | 15 | February 3rd 05 05:24 PM |
Buying an L-2 | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 13 | May 25th 04 04:03 AM |
BUYING Cap 10b(c) | os_pivo | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | October 13th 03 07:15 PM |
FS:CoF and why I won't be buying it | Steve House | Simulators | 4 | August 16th 03 02:24 AM |