Should I be scared -- C172 over Gross

writes:

BTW, since your tunnel vision and self rightous, holier than thou arrogance
prevents you from seeing it, the vast majority of the posters here would
hardly be called "young".

People who are stupid in their youth will also be stupid in their old age.

writes:

Funny that where ever you post there seems to be a "treehouse club"
that thinks you are a twit.

I consider it more sad than funny. There are a lot of mean people in the
world, and for some reason cyberspace encourages them to show their true
colors.

Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

BTW, since your tunnel vision and self rightous, holier than thou arrogance
prevents you from seeing it, the vast majority of the posters here would
hardly be called "young".

People who are stupid in their youth will also be stupid in their old age.


You are to be Congratulated!

With this absolutely astounding statement of astronomically historic and
infallible intellect, you have succeeded in completely negating the
entire concept of learning.

--
Dudley Henriques

wrote:

Funny that where ever you post there seems to be a "treehouse club"
that thinks you are a twit.



That's because as a child he wasn't let into some kids treehouse club
because hsi social skills were no better then than they are now.

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
writes:

BTW, since your tunnel vision and self rightous, holier than thou
arrogance
prevents you from seeing it, the vast majority of the posters here would
hardly be called "young".

People who are stupid in their youth will also be stupid in their old age.

Does than mean you don't aspire to get better someday? Or just realize your
limitations?

Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

BTW, since your tunnel vision and self rightous, holier than thou arrogance
prevents you from seeing it, the vast majority of the posters here would
hardly be called "young".

People who are stupid in their youth will also be stupid in their old age.

A non sequitur to your original statement and yet more rationalization as
to why everyone but you is out of step.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

Funny that where ever you post there seems to be a "treehouse club"
that thinks you are a twit.

I consider it more sad than funny. There are a lot of mean people in the
world, and for some reason cyberspace encourages them to show their true
colors.

Gee, isn't is sad that the every where Anthoney goes all the meanies
gang up on him through no fault of his own?

Poor, poor, picked on Athoney.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Mxsmanic wrote:

People who are stupid in their youth will also be stupid in their old age.


Just because that is true in your case Anthony does not necessarily mean
it is a rule.

Dudley Henriques writes:

You are to be Congratulated!

With this absolutely astounding statement of astronomically historic and
infallible intellect, you have succeeded in completely negating the
entire concept of learning.

You're confusing acquired knowledge with intelligence. Intelligence is
relatively static throughout life, but acquired knowledge tends to steadily
increase.

Learning is the process of acquiring knowledge; it has no effect on
intelligence. However, aptitude--the capacity to learn--is largely a function
of intelligence. Smart people learn faster and more easily, all else being
equal. This is why smart people tend to know more than stupid people.

Maxwell writes:

Does than mean you don't aspire to get better someday?

In terms of intelligence, there is little that can be done to increase it.
Disease states and disorders (e.g., brain injuries) can reduce intelligence,
though.