I need to trace an IP address

Dudley Henriques wrote in news:7eWdnWwrDr-
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Buttman wrote in news:furcr6$cs2$2
@registered.motzarella.org:

On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 01:31:00 +0000, Buttman sayeth:

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:28:34 -0700, gatt sayeth:
I'm curious: It's clear that you have some sort of personal issue
with
Dudley, but WTF does it have to do with rec.aviation.piloting?
I don't know. I'm not the one who made this thread. What does
tracing
an
IP have to do with piloting?

He's given me some great advice here that has been very useful
toward
my IFR, Commercial and CFI training and understanding, and I have
no
doubt that he's been a great help to other folks on the forums
because
they've said so.
I just don't see it. All I ever see him post is either pointless
one
liners, or a 5 paragraph post filled with convoluted sentence
structures
and odd formal tones to make the post sound smarter than it really
is,
but in the end all he ever does is, at best, state the obvious.
He's
the
perfect example of the type of person who may have done good things
in
the past, but has fallen victim to his own hype.

I mean, he wrote his own god damn wikipedia entry for petes sake.
He's
the type of person who would instruct in his will to have a
monument
build honoring him after he does, paid by his own estate (ala Evel
Knievel).

People like that just amuse me. I think it's fun to mess with them
and
watch them try to rationalize their actions. "Oh I didn't write it
as
a
vanity article, I wrote it as a service to my millions of fans that
fill
my fan-club office's mailbox with requests to hear my exciting life
story. Huh? Whats that, someone doesn't like my article and thinks
it
should be deleted? Oh well thats OK because it's not really needed
anymore anyways..." Freaking hilarious.


I definately can't say that others here, know what I mean?

-c
CP-ASEL-IA
You're saying Dudly is the only person here who makes worthwile
posts?
I don't know if this is showing up more than once, but I only meant
to
send it once



We understand. it;'s the jerking off thing.

Bertie

At least he seems to have the situation well in hand :-)
D


Groan!

Oops!

Bertie

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Dudley Henriques wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Dudley Henriques wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
You should stop jerking off while you hit "send"



Bertie
I think it's anger :-)) He wants to make sure EVERYBODY notices it
:-))
D

that can be arranged!

Bertie

He IS a real trip isn't he? Oh well...goes with Usenet I guess. :-)

It's what i like about it best..He's entertaining, but not especially
so. He's definitely kicking it up a notch with this latest ****, ghough.


Bertie


Expected. He's been chaffing at the bit since the "fuel starvation on
takeoff" thread. When people like him get nailed, they strike back at
the hammer. No big fuss. They attack where they think they see
vulnerability, in my case, my having been around since the dinosaurs
equates to my "self importance".
What's really tragic about guys like this is that instead of sitting
back and learning something (not only from me, but from others with
experience as well) they miss the resources available to them.
In this case, he sees the fact that I see myself as a resource for him
as an expression of self importance. Sad!
Part of it's my fault for sure. I really jumped on his ass about that
pulling the fuel valve bit he did on a student. I should have approached
him differently. Nobody likes to be told they're flat wrong, especially
on a public forum.
I might have helped him instead of ****ing him off like I did.
Oh well........maybe he's right about one thing. Years ago I wouldn't
have made that mistake :-)


--
Dudley

Dudley Henriques wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Dudley Henriques wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Dudley Henriques wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
You should stop jerking off while you hit "send"



Bertie
I think it's anger :-)) He wants to make sure EVERYBODY notices it
:-))
D

that can be arranged!

Bertie

He IS a real trip isn't he? Oh well...goes with Usenet I guess. :-)

It's what i like about it best..He's entertaining, but not especially
so. He's definitely kicking it up a notch with this latest ****,
ghough.


Bertie


Expected. He's been chaffing at the bit since the "fuel starvation on
takeoff" thread. When people like him get nailed, they strike back at
the hammer. No big fuss. They attack where they think they see
vulnerability, in my case, my having been around since the dinosaurs
equates to my "self importance".
What's really tragic about guys like this is that instead of sitting
back and learning something (not only from me, but from others with
experience as well) they miss the resources available to them.
In this case, he sees the fact that I see myself as a resource for him
as an expression of self importance. Sad!
Part of it's my fault for sure. I really jumped on his ass about that
pulling the fuel valve bit he did on a student. I should have
approached him differently. Nobody likes to be told they're flat
wrong, especially on a public forum.
I might have helped him instead of ****ing him off like I did.
Oh well........maybe he's right about one thing. Years ago I wouldn't
have made that mistake :-)


Mmm, I kinda doubt you could have helped him. He's shown what he is
clearly at this stage and "learner" doesn;'t seem to be part of his
makeup in any way shape or form.



Bertie

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Dudley Henriques wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Dudley Henriques wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Dudley Henriques wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
You should stop jerking off while you hit "send"



Bertie
I think it's anger :-)) He wants to make sure EVERYBODY notices it
:-))
D

that can be arranged!

Bertie

He IS a real trip isn't he? Oh well...goes with Usenet I guess. :-)
It's what i like about it best..He's entertaining, but not especially
so. He's definitely kicking it up a notch with this latest ****,
ghough.


Bertie

Expected. He's been chaffing at the bit since the "fuel starvation on
takeoff" thread. When people like him get nailed, they strike back at
the hammer. No big fuss. They attack where they think they see
vulnerability, in my case, my having been around since the dinosaurs
equates to my "self importance".
What's really tragic about guys like this is that instead of sitting
back and learning something (not only from me, but from others with
experience as well) they miss the resources available to them.
In this case, he sees the fact that I see myself as a resource for him
as an expression of self importance. Sad!
Part of it's my fault for sure. I really jumped on his ass about that
pulling the fuel valve bit he did on a student. I should have
approached him differently. Nobody likes to be told they're flat
wrong, especially on a public forum.
I might have helped him instead of ****ing him off like I did.
Oh well........maybe he's right about one thing. Years ago I wouldn't
have made that mistake :-)


Mmm, I kinda doubt you could have helped him. He's shown what he is
clearly at this stage and "learner" doesn;'t seem to be part of his
makeup in any way shape or form.



Bertie

Could be right at that. Certainly a consideration.

--
Dudley Henriques

"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
...
Buttman wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:06:39 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:

No need. I've already taken steps with Wikipedia that will remove the
biographical sketch by my own request. The requests I get for this
information are declining anyway, and our office can handle it here when
and if needed. When the bio was uploaded to Wiki, I should have realized
and taken into account Usenet nonsense.
No biggie at all.

Funny, as just yesterday you were defending the page, saying it was
"frequently" needed:

"Just to enlighten you, I serve an many real world aviation safety think
tanks where requests for a bio are frequently asked for. The wiki page
simply makes it easier for interested people to access requested
information."

Now that the wikipedia admins are deleting it, you're now saying the page
is not needed?

Nice try but not really a very good twist on the real situation.
The quote you have presented here without the accompanying text that
completes the post was written ONLY after the bio was attacked by another
poster. In other words, the information about the bio was NOT used until
it was mentioned negatively by someone else and in response to what was
said.

As for my asking that the bio be deleted; that decision was made for the
exact reasons given and has nothing whatsoever to do with Wikipedia.

For your information, Wikipedia "deletes" thousands of files they feel are
unnecessary and take up needed space on their site. Our decision to add to
the deletion process was simply offered to inform Wiki that we understand
the situation completely.

God, what a small world you live in.


--
Dudley Henriques

Ok fine, prove the man wrong. Leave it up for another 30 or 45 days. That'll
show'em.

"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
...
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Dudley Henriques wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
You should stop jerking off while you hit "send"



Bertie
I think it's anger :-)) He wants to make sure EVERYBODY notices it :-))
D


that can be arranged! Bertie


He IS a real trip isn't he? Oh well...goes with Usenet I guess. :-)
D

Damn Dumley, you and Bertie are going to have to stop these circle jerks.
They're just way too obvious.

"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
...
Buttman wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:41:50 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:
Nice try but not really a very good twist on the real situation. The
quote you have presented here without the accompanying text that
completes the post was written ONLY after the bio was attacked by
another poster. In other words, the information about the bio was NOT
used until it was mentioned negatively by someone else and in response
to what was said.


And that changes things, how? One day someone accuses your article of
being crap, you defend it. The next day someone else call it crap by
flagging it, and now you inform the wikipedia admins that you agree it
should be deleted?

You CAN'T be this stupid! But.........:-) It should be obvious that as far
as Wikipedia is concerned, and a simple Google search confirms this BTW,
the article was listed yesterday by Wiki as a candidate for deletion by
them. This simple fact coupled with the idiotic posts made here by you and
Mxsmanic on this thread simply convinced me that it just wasn't worth my
time to defend the issue any longer.
Since the article isn't really needed any longer anyway, I went to the
site and added my name to what I assume was yours. It doesn't matter
really.
All you have succeeded in doing is to remind me the article is no longer
needed.
If you wish to consider this some sort of victory, please do so.

As for my asking that the bio be deleted; that decision was made for the
exact reasons given and has nothing whatsoever to do with Wikipedia.

Oh, I see. Its just a coincidence that you decide to remove your self-
written vanity article less than 12 hours after somebody with a
roadrunner connection in El Paso (which may or may not be me) decides to
flag it as against the wikipedia guidelines.

No, as I said, it was NOT coincidence. The "activity" here on the forum
coupled with realizing that the article was being used as a hammer as you
have done here simply keyed my actions to go to Wiki.
To tell you the truth, until Mxsmanic's post, I had virtually forgotten
the article was there. You can verify that by searching for the last time
I mentioned it on Usenet. In fact, I think I'm fairly safe in telling you
that what you will find are very few if any times I have mentioned the
Wiki article unless someone else mentioned it first; which of course
shoots a rather large hole in your "self importance" theory.

For your information, Wikipedia "deletes" thousands of files they feel
are unnecessary and take up needed space on their site.

Yeah, like your crap article.

Unnecessary comment. Shows REAL agenda here. You REALLY need some lessons
in how to nail people. You're way too obvious with statements like this
one. It fairly shouts that you have "other issues" with the person you're
addressing. In my case, you seem to be harboring a bit of issue over that
run in we had a while back when I told you you were the worst CFI I've
ever encountered on Usenet. :-)

Our decision to
add to the deletion process was simply offered to inform Wiki that we
understand the situation completely.

"Our"? Oh please.

Yes "Our". Explanation not necessary to you.

God, what a small world you live in.

Maybe one of these days you'll realize you're not as important as you
think you are.

I don't think on these terms. What YOU believe I think of myself isn't
necessarily what I DO think of myself......simply your opinion.

Sorry you see me this way, but it obviously can't be helped.
DH

Bull****. You're finally taking it down because the world is making you deal
with how lame it makes you look.

Dudley Henriques wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Dudley Henriques wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Dudley Henriques wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Dudley Henriques wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
You should stop jerking off while you hit "send"



Bertie
I think it's anger :-)) He wants to make sure EVERYBODY notices
it
:-))
D

that can be arranged!

Bertie

He IS a real trip isn't he? Oh well...goes with Usenet I guess.
:-)
It's what i like about it best..He's entertaining, but not
especially
so. He's definitely kicking it up a notch with this latest ****,
ghough.


Bertie

Expected. He's been chaffing at the bit since the "fuel starvation
on
takeoff" thread. When people like him get nailed, they strike back
at
the hammer. No big fuss. They attack where they think they see
vulnerability, in my case, my having been around since the dinosaurs
equates to my "self importance".
What's really tragic about guys like this is that instead of sitting
back and learning something (not only from me, but from others with
experience as well) they miss the resources available to them.
In this case, he sees the fact that I see myself as a resource for
him
as an expression of self importance. Sad!
Part of it's my fault for sure. I really jumped on his ass about
that
pulling the fuel valve bit he did on a student. I should have
approached him differently. Nobody likes to be told they're flat
wrong, especially on a public forum.
I might have helped him instead of ****ing him off like I did.
Oh well........maybe he's right about one thing. Years ago I
wouldn't
have made that mistake :-)


Mmm, I kinda doubt you could have helped him. He's shown what he is
clearly at this stage and "learner" doesn;'t seem to be part of his
makeup in any way shape or form.



Bertie

Could be right at that. Certainly a consideration.


Well, as evidence I offer up the fact that he keeps coming back to me
for more abuse...


Bertie

"Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in
news

"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
...
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Dudley Henriques wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
You should stop jerking off while you hit "send"



Bertie
I think it's anger :-)) He wants to make sure EVERYBODY notices it
:-)) D


that can be arranged! Bertie


He IS a real trip isn't he? Oh well...goes with Usenet I guess. :-)
D

Damn Dumley, you and Bertie are going to have to stop these circle
jerks. They're just way too obvious.


Yeh, right k00kie boi.


Bertie

"Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in
:


"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
...
Buttman wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:06:39 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:

No need. I've already taken steps with Wikipedia that will remove
the biographical sketch by my own request. The requests I get for
this information are declining anyway, and our office can handle it
here when and if needed. When the bio was uploaded to Wiki, I
should have realized and taken into account Usenet nonsense.
No biggie at all.

Funny, as just yesterday you were defending the page, saying it was
"frequently" needed:

"Just to enlighten you, I serve an many real world aviation safety
think tanks where requests for a bio are frequently asked for. The
wiki page simply makes it easier for interested people to access
requested information."

Now that the wikipedia admins are deleting it, you're now saying the
page is not needed?

Nice try but not really a very good twist on the real situation.
The quote you have presented here without the accompanying text that
completes the post was written ONLY after the bio was attacked by
another poster. In other words, the information about the bio was NOT
used until it was mentioned negatively by someone else and in
response to what was said.

As for my asking that the bio be deleted; that decision was made for
the exact reasons given and has nothing whatsoever to do with
Wikipedia.

For your information, Wikipedia "deletes" thousands of files they
feel are unnecessary and take up needed space on their site. Our
decision to add to the deletion process was simply offered to inform
Wiki that we understand the situation completely.

God, what a small world you live in.


--
Dudley Henriques

Ok fine, prove the man wrong. Leave it up for another 30 or 45 days.
That'll show'em.


Whoosh.


Bertie