I need to trace an IP address

"Maxwell" luv2^fly99@cox.^net wrote in
:


"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
...
Buttman wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:41:50 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:
Nice try but not really a very good twist on the real situation.
The quote you have presented here without the accompanying text
that completes the post was written ONLY after the bio was attacked
by another poster. In other words, the information about the bio
was NOT used until it was mentioned negatively by someone else and
in response to what was said.


And that changes things, how? One day someone accuses your article
of being crap, you defend it. The next day someone else call it crap
by flagging it, and now you inform the wikipedia admins that you
agree it should be deleted?

You CAN'T be this stupid! But.........:-) It should be obvious that
as far as Wikipedia is concerned, and a simple Google search confirms
this BTW, the article was listed yesterday by Wiki as a candidate for
deletion by them. This simple fact coupled with the idiotic posts
made here by you and Mxsmanic on this thread simply convinced me that
it just wasn't worth my time to defend the issue any longer.
Since the article isn't really needed any longer anyway, I went to
the site and added my name to what I assume was yours. It doesn't
matter really.
All you have succeeded in doing is to remind me the article is no
longer needed.
If you wish to consider this some sort of victory, please do so.

As for my asking that the bio be deleted; that decision was made
for the exact reasons given and has nothing whatsoever to do with
Wikipedia.

Oh, I see. Its just a coincidence that you decide to remove your
self- written vanity article less than 12 hours after somebody with
a roadrunner connection in El Paso (which may or may not be me)
decides to flag it as against the wikipedia guidelines.

No, as I said, it was NOT coincidence. The "activity" here on the
forum coupled with realizing that the article was being used as a
hammer as you have done here simply keyed my actions to go to Wiki.
To tell you the truth, until Mxsmanic's post, I had virtually
forgotten the article was there. You can verify that by searching for
the last time I mentioned it on Usenet. In fact, I think I'm fairly
safe in telling you that what you will find are very few if any times
I have mentioned the Wiki article unless someone else mentioned it
first; which of course shoots a rather large hole in your "self
importance" theory.

For your information, Wikipedia "deletes" thousands of files they
feel are unnecessary and take up needed space on their site.

Yeah, like your crap article.

Unnecessary comment. Shows REAL agenda here. You REALLY need some
lessons in how to nail people. You're way too obvious with statements
like this one. It fairly shouts that you have "other issues" with the
person you're addressing. In my case, you seem to be harboring a bit
of issue over that run in we had a while back when I told you you
were the worst CFI I've ever encountered on Usenet. :-)

Our decision to
add to the deletion process was simply offered to inform Wiki that
we understand the situation completely.

"Our"? Oh please.

Yes "Our". Explanation not necessary to you.

God, what a small world you live in.

Maybe one of these days you'll realize you're not as important as
you think you are.

I don't think on these terms. What YOU believe I think of myself
isn't necessarily what I DO think of myself......simply your opinion.

Sorry you see me this way, but it obviously can't be helped.
DH

Bull****. You're finally taking it down because the world is making
you deal with how lame it makes you look.


Do tell, how does that work exactly, wannabe boi?


Bertie

Maxwell wrote:
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
...
Buttman wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:41:50 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:
Nice try but not really a very good twist on the real situation. The
quote you have presented here without the accompanying text that
completes the post was written ONLY after the bio was attacked by
another poster. In other words, the information about the bio was NOT
used until it was mentioned negatively by someone else and in response
to what was said.

And that changes things, how? One day someone accuses your article of
being crap, you defend it. The next day someone else call it crap by
flagging it, and now you inform the wikipedia admins that you agree it
should be deleted?
You CAN'T be this stupid! But.........:-) It should be obvious that as far
as Wikipedia is concerned, and a simple Google search confirms this BTW,
the article was listed yesterday by Wiki as a candidate for deletion by
them. This simple fact coupled with the idiotic posts made here by you and
Mxsmanic on this thread simply convinced me that it just wasn't worth my
time to defend the issue any longer.
Since the article isn't really needed any longer anyway, I went to the
site and added my name to what I assume was yours. It doesn't matter
really.
All you have succeeded in doing is to remind me the article is no longer
needed.
If you wish to consider this some sort of victory, please do so.
As for my asking that the bio be deleted; that decision was made for the
exact reasons given and has nothing whatsoever to do with Wikipedia.
Oh, I see. Its just a coincidence that you decide to remove your self-
written vanity article less than 12 hours after somebody with a
roadrunner connection in El Paso (which may or may not be me) decides to
flag it as against the wikipedia guidelines.
No, as I said, it was NOT coincidence. The "activity" here on the forum
coupled with realizing that the article was being used as a hammer as you
have done here simply keyed my actions to go to Wiki.
To tell you the truth, until Mxsmanic's post, I had virtually forgotten
the article was there. You can verify that by searching for the last time
I mentioned it on Usenet. In fact, I think I'm fairly safe in telling you
that what you will find are very few if any times I have mentioned the
Wiki article unless someone else mentioned it first; which of course
shoots a rather large hole in your "self importance" theory.
For your information, Wikipedia "deletes" thousands of files they feel
are unnecessary and take up needed space on their site.
Yeah, like your crap article.
Unnecessary comment. Shows REAL agenda here. You REALLY need some lessons
in how to nail people. You're way too obvious with statements like this
one. It fairly shouts that you have "other issues" with the person you're
addressing. In my case, you seem to be harboring a bit of issue over that
run in we had a while back when I told you you were the worst CFI I've
ever encountered on Usenet. :-)
Our decision to
add to the deletion process was simply offered to inform Wiki that we
understand the situation completely.
"Our"? Oh please.
Yes "Our". Explanation not necessary to you.
God, what a small world you live in.
Maybe one of these days you'll realize you're not as important as you
think you are.
I don't think on these terms. What YOU believe I think of myself isn't
necessarily what I DO think of myself......simply your opinion.

Sorry you see me this way, but it obviously can't be helped.
DH

Bull****. You're finally taking it down because the world is making you deal
with how lame it makes you look.



Right! :-)) Dream on.

--
Dudley Henriques

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:35:00 -0500, Maxwell sayeth:

"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
...
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Dudley Henriques wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
You should stop jerking off while you hit "send"



Bertie
I think it's anger :-)) He wants to make sure EVERYBODY notices it
:-)) D


that can be arranged! Bertie


He IS a real trip isn't he? Oh well...goes with Usenet I guess. :-) D

Damn Dumley, you and Bertie are going to have to stop these circle
jerks. They're just way too obvious.

Its pathetic isn't it. Pity my news reader had to burp like that, he
would have had to answer to the accusations. Now he gets a convenient
out...

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:13:29 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:

Expected. He's been chaffing at the bit since the "fuel starvation on
takeoff" thread. When people like him get nailed, they strike back at
the hammer. No big fuss. They attack where they think they see
vulnerability, in my case, my having been around since the dinosaurs
equates to my "self importance".
What's really tragic about guys like this is that instead of sitting
back and learning something (not only from me, but from others with
experience as well) they miss the resources available to them. In this
case, he sees the fact that I see myself as a resource for him as an
expression of self importance. Sad! Part of it's my fault for sure. I
really jumped on his ass about that pulling the fuel valve bit he did on
a student. I should have approached him differently. Nobody likes to be
told they're flat wrong, especially on a public forum.
I might have helped him instead of ****ing him off like I did. Oh
well........maybe he's right about one thing. Years ago I wouldn't have
made that mistake :-)

keep telling yourself that, if it makes you feel more relevant.

"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...
Dudley Henriques wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Dudley Henriques wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Dudley Henriques wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Dudley Henriques wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
You should stop jerking off while you hit "send"



Bertie
I think it's anger :-)) He wants to make sure EVERYBODY notices
it
:-))
D

that can be arranged!

Bertie

He IS a real trip isn't he? Oh well...goes with Usenet I guess.
:-)
It's what i like about it best..He's entertaining, but not
especially
so. He's definitely kicking it up a notch with this latest ****,
ghough.


Bertie

Expected. He's been chaffing at the bit since the "fuel starvation
on
takeoff" thread. When people like him get nailed, they strike back
at
the hammer. No big fuss. They attack where they think they see
vulnerability, in my case, my having been around since the dinosaurs
equates to my "self importance".
What's really tragic about guys like this is that instead of sitting
back and learning something (not only from me, but from others with
experience as well) they miss the resources available to them.
In this case, he sees the fact that I see myself as a resource for
him
as an expression of self importance. Sad!
Part of it's my fault for sure. I really jumped on his ass about
that
pulling the fuel valve bit he did on a student. I should have
approached him differently. Nobody likes to be told they're flat
wrong, especially on a public forum.
I might have helped him instead of ****ing him off like I did.
Oh well........maybe he's right about one thing. Years ago I
wouldn't
have made that mistake :-)


Mmm, I kinda doubt you could have helped him. He's shown what he is
clearly at this stage and "learner" doesn;'t seem to be part of his
makeup in any way shape or form.



Bertie

Could be right at that. Certainly a consideration.


Well, as evidence I offer up the fact that he keeps coming back to me
for more abuse...


Bertie

You're not abusing anyone, you moron. It's all in your head.

"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
...
Maxwell wrote:
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
...
Buttman wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:41:50 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:
Nice try but not really a very good twist on the real situation. The
quote you have presented here without the accompanying text that
completes the post was written ONLY after the bio was attacked by
another poster. In other words, the information about the bio was NOT
used until it was mentioned negatively by someone else and in response
to what was said.

And that changes things, how? One day someone accuses your article of
being crap, you defend it. The next day someone else call it crap by
flagging it, and now you inform the wikipedia admins that you agree it
should be deleted?
You CAN'T be this stupid! But.........:-) It should be obvious that as
far as Wikipedia is concerned, and a simple Google search confirms this
BTW, the article was listed yesterday by Wiki as a candidate for
deletion by them. This simple fact coupled with the idiotic posts made
here by you and Mxsmanic on this thread simply convinced me that it just
wasn't worth my time to defend the issue any longer.
Since the article isn't really needed any longer anyway, I went to the
site and added my name to what I assume was yours. It doesn't matter
really.
All you have succeeded in doing is to remind me the article is no longer
needed.
If you wish to consider this some sort of victory, please do so.
As for my asking that the bio be deleted; that decision was made for
the
exact reasons given and has nothing whatsoever to do with Wikipedia.
Oh, I see. Its just a coincidence that you decide to remove your self-
written vanity article less than 12 hours after somebody with a
roadrunner connection in El Paso (which may or may not be me) decides
to flag it as against the wikipedia guidelines.
No, as I said, it was NOT coincidence. The "activity" here on the forum
coupled with realizing that the article was being used as a hammer as
you have done here simply keyed my actions to go to Wiki.
To tell you the truth, until Mxsmanic's post, I had virtually forgotten
the article was there. You can verify that by searching for the last
time I mentioned it on Usenet. In fact, I think I'm fairly safe in
telling you that what you will find are very few if any times I have
mentioned the Wiki article unless someone else mentioned it first; which
of course shoots a rather large hole in your "self importance" theory.
For your information, Wikipedia "deletes" thousands of files they feel
are unnecessary and take up needed space on their site.
Yeah, like your crap article.
Unnecessary comment. Shows REAL agenda here. You REALLY need some
lessons in how to nail people. You're way too obvious with statements
like this one. It fairly shouts that you have "other issues" with the
person you're addressing. In my case, you seem to be harboring a bit of
issue over that run in we had a while back when I told you you were the
worst CFI I've ever encountered on Usenet. :-)
Our decision to
add to the deletion process was simply offered to inform Wiki that we
understand the situation completely.
"Our"? Oh please.
Yes "Our". Explanation not necessary to you.
God, what a small world you live in.
Maybe one of these days you'll realize you're not as important as you
think you are.
I don't think on these terms. What YOU believe I think of myself isn't
necessarily what I DO think of myself......simply your opinion.

Sorry you see me this way, but it obviously can't be helped.
DH

Bull****. You're finally taking it down because the world is making you
deal with how lame it makes you look.



Right! :-)) Dream on.

--
Dudley Henriques

Then leave it up another 30 or 45 days. What have you got to loose?

Maxwell wrote:
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
...
Buttman wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:06:39 -0400, Dudley Henriques sayeth:

No need. I've already taken steps with Wikipedia that will remove the
biographical sketch by my own request. The requests I get for this
information are declining anyway, and our office can handle it here when
and if needed. When the bio was uploaded to Wiki, I should have realized
and taken into account Usenet nonsense.
No biggie at all.
Funny, as just yesterday you were defending the page, saying it was
"frequently" needed:

"Just to enlighten you, I serve an many real world aviation safety think
tanks where requests for a bio are frequently asked for. The wiki page
simply makes it easier for interested people to access requested
information."

Now that the wikipedia admins are deleting it, you're now saying the page
is not needed?
Nice try but not really a very good twist on the real situation.
The quote you have presented here without the accompanying text that
completes the post was written ONLY after the bio was attacked by another
poster. In other words, the information about the bio was NOT used until
it was mentioned negatively by someone else and in response to what was
said.

As for my asking that the bio be deleted; that decision was made for the
exact reasons given and has nothing whatsoever to do with Wikipedia.

For your information, Wikipedia "deletes" thousands of files they feel are
unnecessary and take up needed space on their site. Our decision to add to
the deletion process was simply offered to inform Wiki that we understand
the situation completely.

God, what a small world you live in.


--
Dudley Henriques

Ok fine, prove the man wrong. Leave it up for another 30 or 45 days. That'll
show'em.




God, you really ARE stupid aren't you? You actually don't have a clue do
you? I have no control over what stays up or comes down on Wiki. :-))))))


--
Dudley Henriques

Its a senoirs home leave us alone!
Dudley Henriques formulated the question :
72.191.163.46

Dudley Henriques schrieb:

Thanks for the feedback. I'm on a Mac and I don't have a DOS prompt.

uhh .. oohh.
then use the shell that came with your OS (terminal).

#m

Buttman wrote in news:furhdb$tjj$1
@registered.motzarella.org:

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:35:00 -0500, Maxwell sayeth:

"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
...
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Dudley Henriques wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
You should stop jerking off while you hit "send"



Bertie
I think it's anger :-)) He wants to make sure EVERYBODY notices it
:-)) D


that can be arranged! Bertie


He IS a real trip isn't he? Oh well...goes with Usenet I guess. :-)
D

Damn Dumley, you and Bertie are going to have to stop these circle
jerks. They're just way too obvious.

Its pathetic isn't it. Pity my news reader had to burp like that, he
would have had to answer to the accusations. Now he gets a convenient
out...


Good grief, how crazy are you, exactly?

Bertie