A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Is This Why



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old November 17th 08, 06:57 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,alt.comp.freeware,rec.aviation.student
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,767
Default Is This Why

On Nov 15, 8:35*am, Bear Bottoms wrote:
This happened to me.

I was hauling a bunch of stuff, one kilo per package. I was within
weight-and-balance. But one by one they slid to the very back. They were
left on the conveyor belt rollers by mistake.

More kilos slid, the center of gravity moves aft, So I dialed in more
nose-down trim. Soon..no decalage. I got careful.

She wouldn't maintain airspeed. I thought I was going to rip the plane
apart. But I did not. I thought she would stall. Then the nose pitched
up. I pushed on the steering, more stall!!

We opened the side do0r (I know FAA regs ouch) and threw the "stuff"
out. All was ok.

Why did the nose pith *up*? Why did adding flippers not work right?


This would be a great question for the simulator group. Please take
the question over there.

-Robert
  #32  
Old November 17th 08, 09:54 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Bear Bottoms[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 127
Default Is This Why

On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 10:57:07 -0800 (PST), Robert M. Gary wrote:

On Nov 15, 8:35*am, Bear Bottoms wrote:
This happened to me.

I was hauling a bunch of stuff, one kilo per package. I was within
weight-and-balance. But one by one they slid to the very back. They were
left on the conveyor belt rollers by mistake.

More kilos slid, the center of gravity moves aft, So I dialed in more
nose-down trim. Soon..no decalage. I got careful.

She wouldn't maintain airspeed. I thought I was going to rip the plane
apart. But I did not. I thought she would stall. Then the nose pitched
up. I pushed on the steering, more stall!!

We opened the side do0r (I know FAA regs ouch) and threw the "stuff"
out. All was ok.

Why did the nose pith *up*? Why did adding flippers not work right?


This would be a great question for the simulator group. Please take
the question over there.

-Robert


Another troll. Go **** yourself. In your nose.
--
Bear "Cocaine 4 Kids" Bottoms; Google Me!
  #33  
Old November 17th 08, 09:59 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Dudley Henriques[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,546
Default Is This Why

On Nov 17, 4:54*pm, Bear Bottoms wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 10:57:07 -0800 (PST), Robert M. Gary wrote:
On Nov 15, 8:35*am, Bear Bottoms wrote:
This happened to me.


I was hauling a bunch of stuff, one kilo per package. I was within
weight-and-balance. But one by one they slid to the very back. They were
left on the conveyor belt rollers by mistake.


More kilos slid, the center of gravity moves aft, So I dialed in more
nose-down trim. Soon..no decalage. I got careful.


She wouldn't maintain airspeed. I thought I was going to rip the plane
apart. But I did not. I thought she would stall. Then the nose pitched
up. I pushed on the steering, more stall!!


We opened the side do0r (I know FAA regs ouch) and threw the "stuff"
out. All was ok.


Why did the nose pith *up*? Why did adding flippers not work right?


This would be a great question for the simulator group. Please take
the question over there.


-Robert


Another troll. Go **** yourself. In your nose.
--
Bear "Cocaine 4 Kids" Bottoms; Google Me!


Making more friends with your "expertise" Bear??? :-)))))))))
DH
  #34  
Old November 17th 08, 10:27 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,767
Default Is This Why

On Nov 17, 1:54*pm, Bear Bottoms wrote:

Another troll. Go **** yourself. In your nose.


Would you mind sharing with us the definition of "troll" that you are
using.
How does your completely made up silly post not count as trolling but
my suggestion that you ask the simulator guys is trolling?

-Robert, CFII
  #35  
Old November 17th 08, 10:33 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Bear Bottoms[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 127
Default Is This Why

On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:27:52 -0800 (PST), Robert M. Gary wrote:

On Nov 17, 1:54*pm, Bear Bottoms wrote:

Another troll. Go **** yourself. In your nose.


Would you mind sharing with us the definition of "troll" that you are
using.
-Robert, CFII


Sure. You.
--
There is apparently a little bit of communism in most New Englanders.
  #36  
Old November 18th 08, 12:37 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.student
Mike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 573
Default Is This Why

"Bear Bottoms" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:27:52 -0800 (PST), Robert M. Gary wrote:

On Nov 17, 1:54 pm, Bear Bottoms wrote:

Another troll. Go **** yourself. In your nose.


Would you mind sharing with us the definition of "troll" that you are
using.
-Robert, CFII


Sure. You.


....sez the most full of $hit poster on RAP, and that's actually saying quite
a bit.

Do you really think anyone for a minute buys your full of $hit stories, or
that you can actually forge other people's posts without anyone figuring out
it was you? I'm not really sure why you even bother to take the time to
bang them out on your keyboard. No doubt you've simply consumed too much of
the product you fantasize about flying around.

You're also not "Bear Bottoms" as that identity is forged also. You're
simply a $hitstain on the usenet walls, and not a particular good one at
that. I'm sure you think your forging tricks are clever, but they aren't.
You're sophomoric, you're boring, and you're a loser.

  #37  
Old November 18th 08, 01:57 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Maxwell[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,043
Default Is This Why


"Mike" nospam @ aol.com wrote in message
...
| "Bear Bottoms" wrote in message
| ...
| On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:27:52 -0800 (PST), Robert M. Gary wrote:
|
| On Nov 17, 1:54 pm, Bear Bottoms wrote:
|
| Another troll. Go **** yourself. In your nose.
|
| Would you mind sharing with us the definition of "troll" that you are
| using.
| -Robert, CFII
|
| Sure. You.
|
| ...sez the most full of $hit poster on RAP, and that's actually saying
quite
| a bit.
|
| Do you really think anyone for a minute buys your full of $hit stories, or
| that you can actually forge other people's posts without anyone figuring
out
| it was you? I'm not really sure why you even bother to take the time to
| bang them out on your keyboard. No doubt you've simply consumed too much
of
| the product you fantasize about flying around.
|
| You're also not "Bear Bottoms" as that identity is forged also. You're
| simply a $hitstain on the usenet walls, and not a particular good one at
| that. I'm sure you think your forging tricks are clever, but they aren't.
| You're sophomoric, you're boring, and you're a loser.
|

Don't worry Mikey Mouth, your antics still have him covered.


  #38  
Old November 18th 08, 03:10 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 573
Default Is This Why

"Maxwell" #$$9#@%%%.^^^ wrote in message
...

"Mike" nospam @ aol.com wrote in message
...
| "Bear Bottoms" wrote in message
| ...
| On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:27:52 -0800 (PST), Robert M. Gary wrote:
|
| On Nov 17, 1:54 pm, Bear Bottoms wrote:
|
| Another troll. Go **** yourself. In your nose.
|
| Would you mind sharing with us the definition of "troll" that you are
| using.
| -Robert, CFII
|
| Sure. You.
|
| ...sez the most full of $hit poster on RAP, and that's actually saying
quite
| a bit.
|
| Do you really think anyone for a minute buys your full of $hit stories,
or
| that you can actually forge other people's posts without anyone figuring
out
| it was you? I'm not really sure why you even bother to take the time to
| bang them out on your keyboard. No doubt you've simply consumed too
much
of
| the product you fantasize about flying around.
|
| You're also not "Bear Bottoms" as that identity is forged also. You're
| simply a $hitstain on the usenet walls, and not a particular good one at
| that. I'm sure you think your forging tricks are clever, but they
aren't.
| You're sophomoric, you're boring, and you're a loser.
|

Don't worry Mikey Mouth, your antics still have him covered.


Ah, Maxipad rushes to the defense of yet another one of his fellow
$hitstains, right on que.

Predictable.

  #39  
Old November 20th 08, 12:17 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,alt.comp.freeware,rec.aviation.student
Bertie the Bunyip[_28_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 481
Default Is This Why

Bear Bottoms wrote in -
privat.org:

This happened to me.

I was hauling a bunch of stuff, one kilo per package. I was within
weight-and-balance. But one by one they slid to the very back. They were
left on the conveyor belt rollers by mistake.

More kilos slid, the center of gravity moves aft, So I dialed in more
nose-down trim. Soon..no decalage. I got careful.

She wouldn't maintain airspeed. I thought I was going to rip the plane
apart. But I did not. I thought she would stall. Then the nose pitched
up. I pushed on the steering, more stall!!

We opened the side do0r (I know FAA regs ouch) and threw the "stuff"
out. All was ok.

Why did the nose pith *up*? Why did adding flippers not work right?




Because with an aft CG the aerodynamic center moves forwards. the airplane
is beginning to want to go backwards.




Bertie
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.