further thoughts about women suicide bombers

This thread has been a hoot, indeed (thanks Dan!). I never saw a
thread before where many of the intelligent posters on this group fell
for it!
--
G Hassenpflug * IJN & JMSDF equipment/history fan

Cub Driver wrote in message . ..
female suicide bomber got the 72 virgins issued to martyrs in heaven,

Actually, this is one of those things that have been nagging at me for
a bit. Gender details aside, what good is an eternity in the company
of 72 virgins? I mean, think about it, if you refrain from the implied
x-rated activities, you're basically surrounded for all eternity by 72
members of the opposite sex, all but guaranteed to engage in
continuous "girly talk" (don't know a word for the male equivalent,
but it must be just as bad if you're a woman), and all you can do
watch and be bored and tempted at the same time. Not much of a reward,
if you ask me. On the other hand, if the x-rated activities do occur,
even 72 of them aren't going to last very long as virgins, given that
you've got all of eternity to work with.
Am I the only one who can't make sense of this?

Rob

B2431 wrote:

I am the "despicable mysogynist" who asked the question. The question is valid
and still stands. One of the rewards frequently cited for martyrs is the 72
virgins. I never said the virgins the female martyrs would get were also
female.

*Seventy-two* virgins??!!!

For some reason, I was thinking it was seven, like in one for each day of
the week. But that keeps you in virgins for only a week, while 72 provides
a 10 week, 2 day supply.

But you're dead, so we're talking eternity here. Is there much difference
between one week and 10 weeks when you're stuck somewhere for eternity?
Wouldn't you have to put some pretty severe rationing on virgin use?

Geez so many questions!

I'm gonna have to rethink this suicide bombing stuff all over again!


SMH

Rob van Riel wrote:

Cub Driver wrote in message . ..

female suicide bomber got the 72 virgins issued to martyrs in heaven,


Actually, this is one of those things that have been nagging at me for
a bit. Gender details aside, what good is an eternity in the company
of 72 virgins? I mean, think about it, if you refrain from the implied
x-rated activities, you're basically surrounded for all eternity by 72
members of the opposite sex, all but guaranteed to engage in
continuous "girly talk" (don't know a word for the male equivalent,
but it must be just as bad if you're a woman), and all you can do
watch and be bored and tempted at the same time. Not much of a reward,
if you ask me. On the other hand, if the x-rated activities do occur,
even 72 of them aren't going to last very long as virgins, given that
you've got all of eternity to work with.
Am I the only one who can't make sense of this?

My sentiments exactly Rob!

I lived in Cameroon for a time, and I was told (on very good authority)
that the best number of wives to have was three.

If you have one wife, you get nagged by her. If you have two, you get
two women nagging you.

But if you have three, there will always be one that will take your
side of a disagreement, and the women will end up arguing among themselves,
leaving you, the husband, in peace.

Now this may hold true for 72 virgins as well, but I would think by then,
the raucousness of disagreement would become too terrible to bear.

Yes, Cameroon had a very male dominated society!


SMH

"Cub Driver" wrote in message
...

I believe it's pertinent, and if a serious question , deserves a better
answer than that offered by Ford.

You guys are a hoot. At what stage of your lives did you stop
laughing?

all the best -- Dan Ford
email:

That's an interesting observation Dan; I guess it's supposed to be your
subtle way of letting us know that what you said was tongue in cheek and
that we, having lost our sense of humor, missed your otherwise obvious
attempt at playing the devil's advocate?
Well, FWIW old buddy, there are issues I'll laugh about, and issues I'll let
pass without using them to fuel my sense of humor; or anyone else's for that
matter; and using an issue like this, is one I wouldn't use. Obviously, we
disagree on our definition of what's "laughable".
Aside from this, and after reading your initial post again word for word
from top to bottom and finding absolutely nothing there that indicates in
any way whatsoever that the post is anything but serious, might I suggest
that in the future, if subtle humor or sarcasm is your intent, and since
you're a professional writer :-), perhaps you could bend a bit for us less
intelligent and less intellectual types out here and try posting with at
least SOME indication that what you are posting is tongue in cheek?
Finally, since my sense of humor doesn't include discussing people blowing
themselves up, I'll go somewhere else and find another thread where I might
put my sense of humor to better use.
Hey, as you like to say,
"All the best"
Dudley Henriques
International Fighter Pilots Fellowship
Commercial Pilot/ CFI Retired
For personal email, please replace
the z's with e's.
dhenriquesATzarthlinkDOTnzt

John‰] wrote:

In article , Stephen Harding
wrote:



B2431 wrote:



I am the "despicable mysogynist" who asked the question. The question is
valid
and still stands. One of the rewards frequently cited for martyrs is the 72
virgins. I never said the virgins the female martyrs would get were also
female.


*Seventy-two* virgins??!!!

For some reason, I was thinking it was seven, like in one for each day of
the week. But that keeps you in virgins for only a week, while 72 provides
a 10 week, 2 day supply.

But you're dead, so we're talking eternity here. Is there much difference
between one week and 10 weeks when you're stuck somewhere for eternity?
Wouldn't you have to put some pretty severe rationing on virgin use?

Geez so many questions!

I'm gonna have to rethink this suicide bombing stuff all over again!


SMH



Actually this provision of the Koran was exposed as a typographical
error several years ago.

It doesn't say "...72 virgins...", it says "...a 72-year-old virgin...."


I've heard that it's supposed to be "72 Virginians." They're going to be
awfully suprised when the graduating class of VMI shows up...

It doesn't say "...72 virgins...", it says "...a 72-year-old virgin...."

Gosh, all along I thought it was 72 Virginians.

The female suicide bomber approach sounds to me like some sicko guy's way of of
getting a real piece of ass.

On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 08:16:58 -0500, Stephen Harding wrote:

B2431 wrote:

I am the "despicable mysogynist" who asked the question. The question is valid
and still stands. One of the rewards frequently cited for martyrs is the 72
virgins. I never said the virgins the female martyrs would get were also
female.

*Seventy-two* virgins??!!!

For some reason, I was thinking it was seven, like in one for each day of
the week. But that keeps you in virgins for only a week, while 72 provides
a 10 week, 2 day supply.

But you're dead, so we're talking eternity here. Is there much difference
between one week and 10 weeks when you're stuck somewhere for eternity?
Wouldn't you have to put some pretty severe rationing on virgin use?

Geez so many questions!

I'm gonna have to rethink this suicide bombing stuff all over again!


SMH


Living with 72 women would meet my definition of hell, but I think that
they were speaking of heaven?

Al Minyard

Actually this provision of the Koran was exposed as a typographical
error several years ago.

It doesn't say "...72 virgins...", it says "...a 72-year-old virgin...."

Well...yes...I suppose one must consider the advantage of being
present during the release of all that pent-up frustration...um,
yas.
--

-Gord.

"Stephen Harding" wrote in message
...
Rob van Riel wrote:

Cub Driver wrote in message
. ..

female suicide bomber got the 72 virgins issued to martyrs in heaven,


Actually, this is one of those things that have been nagging at me for
a bit. Gender details aside, what good is an eternity in the company
of 72 virgins? I mean, think about it, if you refrain from the implied
x-rated activities, you're basically surrounded for all eternity by 72
members of the opposite sex, all but guaranteed to engage in
continuous "girly talk" (don't know a word for the male equivalent,
but it must be just as bad if you're a woman), and all you can do
watch and be bored and tempted at the same time. Not much of a reward,
if you ask me. On the other hand, if the x-rated activities do occur,
even 72 of them aren't going to last very long as virgins, given that
you've got all of eternity to work with.
Am I the only one who can't make sense of this?

My sentiments exactly Rob!

I lived in Cameroon for a time, and I was told (on very good authority)
that the best number of wives to have was three.

If you have one wife, you get nagged by her. If you have two, you get
two women nagging you.

But if you have three, there will always be one that will take your
side of a disagreement, and the women will end up arguing among
themselves,
leaving you, the husband, in peace.

Now this may hold true for 72 virgins as well, but I would think by then,
the raucousness of disagreement would become too terrible to bear.

Yes, Cameroon had a very male dominated society!


SMH

Reminds of a tour I made of Hampton Court, many years ago. The guide was
talking about King Henry the 8th who had six wives ! and he quoted, one for
each day of the week and a bit of peace on Sunday !

BMC